Posted on 02/13/2004 6:45:32 AM PST by I_Love_My_Husband
Yes, but you're a good candidate for those civil union freebies. LOL
If we can change the laws for sexual choices, we can certainly change the laws for "wants." Who says sexual choices are better than material wants? Are we a nation of wantaphobes???
Hey! Are you discriminating against those who have an object fetish? Who are you to judge? Those with an object fetish have just as many rights as those with an anal fetish. "Bigot! Objectaphobe!"
It's a "lifestyle choice."
choice (chois) n.
1. The act of choosing; selection.
2. The power, right, or liberty to choose; option.
3. One that is chosen.
4. A number or variety from which to choose
Have they tried psychiatric or spiritual help to aid them in curing their dysfunction? My guess is they're not even trying. They "choose" not to.
Their mental illness shouldn't be such a burden on the American people. There is help available. They just have to admit they're ill first before they can heal.
Because they "choose" not to seek aid, why should Americans belittle themselves to accommodate them? Should all Americans become alcoholics because a few have "chosen" to drink? Drug addicts because a few like drugs?
Laws of nature. Name one species of plant or animal on the planet earth that's naturally homosexual. There isn't any.
Only those born with a disability or mutation would engage in such an unnatural behavior. Nature usually eliminates them to ensure the survival of the species, as it's doing now through AIDs and various homosexual diseases and infections. Homosexuality is unnatural in every aspect. Culturally, naturally, spiritually. No where is it considered "normal" but in the irrational mind of the homosexual itself.
And if it isn't a choice, why are there so many who thumb their noses at safe sex. Why do so many have so many sex partners a year? I may be born an alcoholic, but it's still my responsibility to avoid alchohol so as not to harm myself and others. Same goes for gays.
There's nothing to prove it isn't. Could you inform me?
Those who desire to become normal have succeeded. Many homosexuals have joined the rest of society without a problem. There's testimonial after testimonial of the joys that follow the freedom attained from choosing life over homosexual addiction.
Many alcoholics have stopped drinking. Drug addicts are now clean.
There is no logical reason for a person to engage in homosexuality except through perverted thoughts. They are what they think.
No, but they're having demented thoughts and should stop before their thoughts drag them into the urine drenched back allies . Maybe seek out a family member or friend to help them never to do it again.
If someone is attracted to someone of the opposite sex, but never acts on that attraction, are they straight.
Yes. It's a biological reaction. Male is naturally attracted to female via pheromones located in various areas of the human body. That's how our natural system works. It's a system developed to aid procreation and again survival of the species. It's genetically programmed. It's normal.
If someone has no attraction of any kind to either sex, are they gay or straight?
They're Catholic Priests.
No, wait, They molested over 500 young boys. That would make them homosexual pedophiles.
I would refer to that as a problem. They should at least see a doctor, but they pose no threat to society. As long as they don't use fascist litigation to force their lifestyle on everyone else. The inability to procreate would cause humans to go extinct.
You have an amazing view of the world.
Homosexuals are mentally ill. We know that already. They were always kept in mental institutions, but were let out to save money. (Dumb move, aye?)They don't see the world as others see it. They think they're healthy, and the other 98% of the population is sick. They call the normal people names, and try to war with them in the courts.
Normal people see the boat moving away from the shore. A dysfunctonal homosexual would see the shore moving away from the boat and sue in court to force others to accept their vision, even though the normal know they're wrong. The dysfunctiuonal, no matter how hard the people of America try, will refuse to see the boat is indeed the moving object, and it's the shore that's stationary.
What's your point? So they have sex. It's natural for their species to mate. I asked you to name one species of plant or animal that is naturally homosexual, not heterosexual or self seeding.
You know, dysfunctional. Outside the norm of nature.
I'd enjoy it in private and that's what I thought the gays and lesbians wanted. To do their own thing in the privacy of their own homes.
Now let me ask you something. If that's all the gays want, why do they push their "diversity" and tolerance in our public schools? I've never had a problem with gays seeking their own. I've worked with gay people and had no desire to point fingers or call them names or harm them.
What they are doing now is to entice our children to explore their sexuality preference and they are reaching down into the elementary school grades now to do that.
And when talking about the sexual promiscuity in heteros, I am just as dismayed about the cultural acceptance of this as as I am of in your face gay behavior.
But we are talking about gays in this thread and you can look to some European countries for proof that eventually they will want to lower the age of consent. For instance, the Netherlands have lowered the age of consent to 12. And this was pushed by the gay community there. When you were 12, were you able to make a mature, thoughtful decision (weighing the pros and cons about your decision) about who you wanted to have sex with?
We, who oppose gay marriage, have seen how they have gone from "just let us do what we want in the privacy of our bedrooms" to marriage and we do not like what could be next on their demands. Even the Gay Agenda of 1972 spells out lowering the age of consent. Would you approve of gay/lesbian couples adopting same sex children so they could have a ready youngster to fool around with?
I suppose if homosexual marriage passes, because the pedophiles are also in "love", they'll be demanding equal rights to their fetish, too.
After all, "love" is the new homosexual key word. NAMBLA says they have that for their victims.
Yes. It's a dysfunctional sex fetish. It's no different that those attracted to animals, shoes, trees, frogs, forks, or what ever twisted idea comes out of their imagination.
It's biologically impossable for homosexuals to have the same attraction to each other as male and female.
The dysfunctional just get off on weird things. That's what they want. The sicker it is, the better they like it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.