Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill O'Reilly still doesn't get it
WorldNetDaily ^ | February 14, 2004 | Stephen Bennett

Posted on 02/14/2004 1:04:29 PM PST by scripter

In the past several days, the media have descended on Massachusetts like a flock of vultures on a wounded prey. The scenes inside and outside the Statehouse are described by many as "surreal." With the thousands of people and hundreds of cameras on Beacon Hill, the legislators say they have never seen or experienced anything like this before.

The hoopla, of course, is about "gay" marriage.

One of the greatest battles for America's future right now is being waged in Massachusetts – an outcome that will affect and possibly change our entire nation forever. Simply put, this battle is about one thing: do we or don't we, as a nation, embrace and accept the practice of homosexuality in America?

To observe the national media's biased reporting on this issue is disheartening, to say the least.

My wife, Irene, and I both led teams at pro-marriage rallies this past weekend in Hartford, Conn., and Boston, Mass. We were there. Yet the media's reporting was undoubtedly biased beyond belief. You would think they were at a different rally than we were. With upwards of 6,000 people rallying in support of marriage between a man and a woman in Connecticut and literally only a handful of homosexual protesters, the media gave all of the air time to the "gay" activists and their rally! The same angle was sadly taken in Massachusetts.

Watching the cable news programs and their reporting on America's homosexual dilemma isn't any better. It just shows how biased and one-sided the media really are.

Bill O'Reilly, host of "The O'Reilly Factor" on the Fox News Channel, on Feb. 11 featured Kevin Jennings, the executive director of GLSEN, the Gay, Lesbian, Straight Education Network. Kevin discussed GLSEN's pro-homosexual curriculum being marketed to public schools all across America under the guise of "tolerance."

GLSEN's material instructs teachers how to teach America's children that "gay is OK." This material falsely equates homosexuality with heterosexuality – teaching we need to accept and embrace everyone for who they "really" are. Bill O'Reilly tragically bit the bait and once again displayed his personal bias, stating he believes all Americans should "pursue happiness."

But what does Bill O'Reilly's think "pursuing happiness" includes?

O'Reilly, watched heavily by conservatives and Christians alike, shocked America in September 2002 when he publicly announced his support of homosexual special rights in the nation's largest homosexual publication, the Advocate. His interview, one he probably wishes would just go away, caused a lot of controversy and dissent among his viewers.

To many, O'Reilly has sold out.

What Bill needs to realize is that he and others in the media are sending a very bad message to America and our children. Does O'Reilly actually think two men engaging in anal intercourse is something America needs to embrace, accepting this behavior in the homosexuals' "pursuit of happiness"?

Does Mr. O'Reilly actually believe a sexual, sadistic act by two lesbians or "gay" men known as "fisting" should be taught to America's teens? This is exactly what was taught during a workshop his guest's organization GLSEN co-sponsored and participated in.

The event, called "Teach Out," took place in March of 2000 in Massachusetts. Drawing national headlines and outrage, the event became known as "Fistgate."

GLSEN also provides a suggested reading list of books to America's youth – many of them containing blatant, pornographic stories of young boys who engage in oral sex and anal intercourse with older boys, as well as lesbian sex between young girls. Most parents are in the dark on the explicit, graphic homosexual content their children are reading. Linda Harvey, executive director of Mission: America has documented several of these and other troubling resources in great detail.

GLSEN is also responsible for encouraging GSA's or gay-straight alliances – "gay" clubs – nearly 2,000 of them – in schools across America. These clubs meet and encourage the students in their homosexual lifestyles – some even encouraging homosexual experimentation. I personally stopped one of these GSA's in Connecticut two years ago from taking their teenage club members on a "field trip" to Provincetown, Mass. – one of the largest homosexual subcultures in the Northeast.

Is this the message that Bill O'Reilly wants to send to America? Are these books he wants America's children to read? Is this what Bill O'Reilly wants to have his child taught? Are these the kind of clubs he wants America's youth to join? Does Bill O'Reilly look forward to the day when his child will walk down the aisle to be married till "death do us part" with his child's homosexual lover?

Bill O'Reilly, who fervently advocates for children by fighting the demeaning messages of Ludicrous, Janet Jackson, Snoop Doggy Dog, Little Kim and others, is being hypocritical and doing a great disservice to America by using his celebrity to endorse the homosexual lifestyle. Homosexuality is not only harmful to children and to society, but has also proven deadly for many.

O'Reilly, who professes the Catholic faith, knows his views are in direct rebellion with the Catholic church's teaching on homosexuality.

Father Harvey, a Catholic priest from New York who heads Courage, a Catholic ministry to those who want to overcome their unwanted same-sex attractions, says people such as O'Reilly are in grave error and have placed themselves "above the church."

The Vatican itself issued a statement months ago addressing politicians and public figures stating no professing Catholic could nor should support the homosexual lifestyle, same-sex unions or "gay" adoption. Yet even with stern warnings from Rome itself – O'Reilly's heart remains hardened.

Bill O'Reilly just doesn't seem to get it. He's right on so many issues, but on homosexuality he's dead wrong. As I've said time and time again, people such as Bill O'Reilly have fallen for the "Gay Spin Zone." Their reasoning is based on emotion, not on logic. It's based on "tolerance," not truth. It's based on believing a misinformation campaign being waged by "gay" activists – and the media are the major conduit.

Tragically, the message Bill O'Reilly is sending to America – is the wrong one.

Bill O'Reilly has had many opportunities to hear the truth about the homosexual lifestyle from many of his guests, including when I appeared on his show back in September of 2002.

Yet he didn't want to listen. He had other motives in mind. Yet as a former homosexual, I encourage Bill O'Reilly to listen and to examine the truth – to put aside his presuppositions and not to go by his emotions. Lives are at stake here – including America's children.

Those such as myself who take a public, principled stand against the embracing and promotion of homosexuality in America do so for a reason. We know the truths and facts about the homosexual lifestyle. I've been there personally and experienced it firsthand.

Our message is not one of hate, but hope. It is not one of discrimination, but of deliverance. A message that I perceived years ago as one of bigotry brought me a new beginning. This same wonderful hope awaits every homosexual man and woman – a chance to become the real men and women they were created to be.

As the issue of homosexuality continues to be at the forefront in America, the media – including Bill O'Reilly – have to be held to higher standards and called to report accurately, fairly and without bias.

Fox News claims to be fair and balanced. Then let America hear the truth, Mr.O'Reilly, about homosexuality. Respectfully, do as you say – "We report, you decide."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; US: Connecticut; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: activistcourts; bigmedia; billoreilly; comeforyourchildren; conservativism; exgays; fox; foxnews; glsen; homosexual; homosexualagenda; indoctrination; mediabias; oreilly; oreillyisgay; pc; politicallycorrect; prisoners; rallyformarriage; ricksantorumwasright; samesexmarriage; santorumwasright; sexualizingchildren; sodomandgomorrah; sodomites; stephenbennett
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-113 next last

1 posted on 02/14/2004 1:04:29 PM PST by scripter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah; EdReform
Ping
2 posted on 02/14/2004 1:04:59 PM PST by scripter (Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scripter
Remember this the next time you hear a liberal say O'Really is a conservative!!!
3 posted on 02/14/2004 1:07:28 PM PST by Brimack34
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
In regards to homosexuality and genetics, the work of homosexual activist Dr. Simon LeVay has often been used to support the idea that homosexuality is genetic, and his work is still quoted to this day. But what did LeVay really find? Here is what LeVay said of his own work in a March 1994 interview with Discover magazine:
"[His 1991 research] made the unassuming LeVay one of the most misunderstood men in America. "It's important to stress what I didn't find," he points out with the courtly patience of someone who long ago got used to waiting for the rest of the world to catch up. "I did not prove that homosexuality is genetic, or find a genetic cause for being gay. I didn't show that gay men are 'born that way,' the most common mistake people make in interpreting my work. Nor did I locate a gay center in the brain --INAH3 is less likely to be the sole gay nucleus of the brain than part of a chain of nuclei engaged in men and women's sexual behavior. My work is just a hint in that direction--a spur, I hope, to future work."
Source: Interview with David Nimmons (March, 1994) "Sex and the Brain", Discover, Vol. 15, No. 3, p. 64-71.

Ten years later still nothing from LeVay or anybody else.

4 posted on 02/14/2004 1:08:00 PM PST by scripter (Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brimack34
I used to call O'Reilly a conservative myself, and then I started watching his show.
5 posted on 02/14/2004 1:08:57 PM PST by scripter (Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: scripter
Bill O'Reilly is an idiot.
He's just a spineless opportunist who masquarades as "common folk".
He uses the same tactics as Democrats to prey on the stupid.

O'Reilly has been on a crusade for a long time now to recast himself as "independent" which means he's touting a lot of liberal propaganda because he got tired of being beaten up for being a conservative from the left. He couldn't take the heat so he got out of the kitchen.
6 posted on 02/14/2004 1:10:09 PM PST by counterpunch (click my name to check out my 'toons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scripter
In 1973 the APA (American Psychiatric Association) declassified homosexuality as a mental disorder. According to Simon LeVay, who is homosexual, an activist and a scientist, said it wasn't science that propelled the APAs change:
"Gay activism was clearly the force that propelled the APA to declassify homosexuality."
Source: Simon LeVay, Queer Science, MIT Press, 1996, p. 224
7 posted on 02/14/2004 1:11:18 PM PST by scripter (Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scripter
O'Reilly is against gay marriage. He's said it over, and over, and over and over. He opposes it for the "flood-gates" implication, meaning that approving gay marriage means polygamy would have to be approved, and bestial "marriages" would also have to be approved.
8 posted on 02/14/2004 1:11:22 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scripter; MeekOneGOP; My2Cents; PhiKapMom; WKB; Tamsey; ambrose; ohioWfan; Howlin
Good post.

The homosexuals are becoming "ruthless" in their pursuits.

*ping* and pass it on please
9 posted on 02/14/2004 1:12:12 PM PST by onyx (Your secrets are safe with me and all my friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
He's just a spineless opportunist who masquarades as "common folk".

That does seem to summarize O'Reilly quite well.

10 posted on 02/14/2004 1:13:01 PM PST by scripter (Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: scripter
Used to love O'Reilley when he first came out ... but he is a blowhard. Too opinioned and lost as some sort of RINO whatever he is. Sorry, no interest in watching or listening to him anymore. Give me Rushbo anyday!!!
11 posted on 02/14/2004 1:13:13 PM PST by AgThorn (Go go Bush!! But don't turn your back on America with "immigrant amnesty")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scripter
Dr. Robert L. Spitzer played a pivotal role in the 1973 decision by the APA to declassify homosexuality as a mental disorder. Spitzer used to believe homosexuals couldn't change but after studying the results of therapy he now believes homosexuals can change:

"I thought that homosexual behavior could be resisted--but that no one could really change their sexual orientation. I now believe that's untrue--some people can and do change." Spitzer completely changed his mind whether or not some homosexuals can change. And then Spitzer concluded with:

"the mental health professionals should stop moving in the direction of banning therapy that has, as a goal, a change in sexual orientation. Many patients, provided with informed consent about the possibility that they will be disappointed if the therapy does not succeed, can make a rational choice to work toward developing their heterosexual potential and minimizing their unwanted homosexual attractions."

Source: Spitzer made the above comments at an annual APA meeting, May 9, 2001. The study was reported in the May 9, 2001 issues of The Washington Post, The New York Times, USA Today and it was also released to many local newspapers via the AP. ABC, CBS, FOX and MSNBC all reported the study.

Spitzer went from believing homosexuals can't change to where they can, and then he goes so far as to say mental health professions shouldn't ban the very therapy resulting in that change.

12 posted on 02/14/2004 1:14:52 PM PST by scripter (Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scripter
Bill O'Reilly reminds me a lot of Kerry. He wakes up in the morning and reads polls in order to decide how he should think for the rest of the day.
13 posted on 02/14/2004 1:15:49 PM PST by armymarinemom (The family reunion is moving to Iran this year-Central location and a shorter trip for the kids)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: armymarinemom
What makes you say that?
14 posted on 02/14/2004 1:16:47 PM PST by Meredith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: scripter; All
"But what does Bill O'Reilly's think "pursuing happiness" includes?"

I think that I know the answer to this question but if I said anything that graphic, I would expect to be removed from this forum. All one has to do to KNOW that this is wrong is to form an image of what these people are doing to each other in one's mind and you'll know that it is wrong. A bit of advice though. Make sure you're somewhere that you can throw up before forming that image.

15 posted on 02/14/2004 1:17:47 PM PST by davisfh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scripter
O'Rielly has turned into the most self-promoted conceted pompous ass on TV and radio. Watching him is almost like watching an angry Ted Baxter. No clout anymore
16 posted on 02/14/2004 1:18:13 PM PST by Bommer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx
I want a complete accounting of all motel receipts, bath house receipts, condom purchases, doctors files, arrest records, photos of known homos O'Reilly has consorted with. I want him to swear on the bible on TV, live, that he has never had anal sex with a homo deviate or an animal. I want him tested for AIDS on live TV. I want him to swear on a bible in a court of law (other than the 9th Circuit) that he has never committed fellation upon a homo or had a homo committ fellatio upon him. I want him to produce any homo marriage licenses he has signed, and I want any homo lovers of his interrogated for further evidence.

And after all of that, I will still NOT be satisfied!

17 posted on 02/14/2004 1:19:01 PM PST by Doc Savage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: scripter
What do you expect from a big fat egotisical Irish BAFOON!

All you need to know about O'Reilly: IT'S ALWAYS-ALWAYS ABOUT HIM!!!!

18 posted on 02/14/2004 1:19:10 PM PST by McBuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Meredith
Both of them will have an opinion on an issue due to popular thoght.
19 posted on 02/14/2004 1:19:12 PM PST by armymarinemom (The family reunion is moving to Iran this year-Central location and a shorter trip for the kids)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
O'Reilly is against gay marriage.

If true I'm glad to hear it. But Bennett didn't say O'Reilly was for homosexual marriage, he claims O'Reilly doesn't get the bigger picture.

20 posted on 02/14/2004 1:20:22 PM PST by scripter (Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: scripter
Unless O'Reilly is a practicing homosexual he is not in contradiction to Church teaching. Unlike abortion which is a situation where advocacy of it results in the taking of innocent life, homosexual conduct, not homosexuality, is a sin. Acceptance of people who participate in homosexual behavior by others, be they a parent of a gay, or a cable TV commentator, in no way contradicts the Church.
21 posted on 02/14/2004 1:20:48 PM PST by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scripter
Are we still slouching towards Gomorrah or are we having a race to see who can get there first?
22 posted on 02/14/2004 1:22:48 PM PST by weegee (Election 2004: Re-elect President Bush... Don't feed the trolls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65
Bennett's article isn't about O'Reilly and the church, it's about how O'Reilly doesn't get it and how O'Reilly has sold out.
23 posted on 02/14/2004 1:25:02 PM PST by scripter (Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: armymarinemom
But one of the reasons O'Reilley is so disliked [or revered] is that he typically goes against popular thought.
24 posted on 02/14/2004 1:25:35 PM PST by Meredith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
O'Reilly is against gay marriage. He's said it over, and over, and over and over. He opposes it for the "flood-gates" implication, meaning that approving gay marriage means polygamy would have to be approved, and bestial "marriages" would also have to be approved.
Thank you for pointing that out.
25 posted on 02/14/2004 1:26:57 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I also think the best argument against gay marriage is the floodgates or slippery slope one (polygamy, bestiality, incest among adults). As for anal intercourse, fisting, and other unsafe (and, to many, disgusting) practices, these can all be performed by heterosexual couples. Should heterosexual couples who prefer those practices to ordinary intercourse be prevented from marrying?
26 posted on 02/14/2004 1:27:19 PM PST by Stirner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
If Bill O'Reilly truly considers this a non-issue, why does he discuss it on his show at all?

Why not devote the time to more pressing questions like the case of whistleblower Miguel Miranda and the judicial nominees memogate?

Why not discuss the facts of the case and press Kerry on an answer as to whether he lied to Congress about the atrocities he claims to have participated in during Vietnam (as is his current stance). Eithe John Kerry lied before congress (aiding and abetting the enemy in wartime by spreading falsehoods and propaganda) or else he participated in warcrimes (activities he himself classified as violating the Geneva Convention).

Bill, who's side are you on?

27 posted on 02/14/2004 1:27:21 PM PST by weegee (Election 2004: Re-elect President Bush... Don't feed the trolls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: scripter
O'Reilly is only concerned with his ratings and his stupid book. I mean, how often does he spend whining about whether Shrially's book or his has sold more copies. He'll do and say whatever he thinks will benefit him. Once the campaign really starts, he'll probably trash Kerry as much as Bush just so he can look "fair and balanced".
28 posted on 02/14/2004 1:27:48 PM PST by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
The "floodgates" also includes spouse benefits at a private employer, church ceremonies, adoption cases, and a whole lot more on "civil rights" grounds.
29 posted on 02/14/2004 1:29:39 PM PST by weegee (Election 2004: Re-elect President Bush... Don't feed the trolls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Doc Savage

ROFLOL! That's perfect!
30 posted on 02/14/2004 1:29:44 PM PST by onyx (Your secrets are safe with me and all my friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Stirner
As for anal intercourse, fisting, and other unsafe (and, to many, disgusting) practices, these can all be performed by heterosexual couples. Should heterosexual couples who prefer those practices to ordinary intercourse be prevented from marrying?

Good point.

31 posted on 02/14/2004 1:30:09 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: weegee
It appears San Francisco is ahead in the race to reach Gomorrah first.
32 posted on 02/14/2004 1:30:32 PM PST by scripter (Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: scripter
Bennett's article isn't about O'Reilly and the church, it's about how O'Reilly doesn't get it and how O'Reilly has sold out.

O'Reilly hasn't "sold out." He says up front that he's not a liberal, nor a conservative. And, if you watch his show, he's not either one, just as he says.

You want him to be a conservative like Fred Barnes, and that's just not going to happen.

33 posted on 02/14/2004 1:32:12 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: scripter
Last night O'Reilley was pushing for the Mayor of San Francisco to be arrested for breaking the law and supporting anarchy.
34 posted on 02/14/2004 1:33:52 PM PST by Meredith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
I don't want O'Reilly to be anything other than someone who presents all the facts on all issues, including homosexuality. And in that regard he has sold out. He doesn't get it.
35 posted on 02/14/2004 1:34:46 PM PST by scripter (Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: scripter
They've been there for a long time but they are still trying to top themselves. The judicial branch (courts) approving marriage licenses for same sex couples (in the absence of law) is another attempt at judicial activism.

We've got a constitutional crisis and a lot of judicial tyranny going on. We are only a few steps away from just outright anarchy (if the lawmakers don't care about law, and the courts don't care about law, why should the public?).

36 posted on 02/14/2004 1:35:12 PM PST by weegee (Election 2004: Re-elect President Bush... Don't feed the trolls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Meredith
That doesn't mean O'Reilly hasn't sold out to presenting all the facts on homosexuality. That doesn't mean O'Reilly "gets it" as Bennett said in his article.
37 posted on 02/14/2004 1:36:13 PM PST by scripter (Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: scripter
I don't want O'Reilly to be anything other than someone who presents all the facts on all issues, including homosexuality. And in that regard he has sold out. He doesn't get it.

According to you.

38 posted on 02/14/2004 1:38:51 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
What is the argument against polygamy or adult incest or prostitution if same sex marriage is legalized?

Consenting adults after all. Either the state (big S or small s) has the power to regulate such behavior or it does not.

If someone thinks that prostitution can be regulated because it is a financial transaction, does that mean that Uncle Sam can stop you from hiring an unlicensed, untrained, and minor babysister since that is a financial transaction as well?

39 posted on 02/14/2004 1:39:46 PM PST by weegee (Election 2004: Re-elect President Bush... Don't feed the trolls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Meredith
Only on issues that he knows are controversial to one group or another. He is more concerned with ratings than values.
40 posted on 02/14/2004 1:40:08 PM PST by armymarinemom (The family reunion is moving to Iran this year-Central location and a shorter trip for the kids)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
According to Bennett as well, the author of the article who was interview by O'Reilly.
41 posted on 02/14/2004 1:40:42 PM PST by scripter (Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: scripter
I just plain don't like o'reilly...can't stand him on the radio and darn sure would not watch him on t.v.

I think he is just a self aggrandizing ego maniac.
42 posted on 02/14/2004 1:45:33 PM PST by cajun-jack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
O'Reilly is a phony. He initially attracted his large audience by telling the truth and analyzing issues based on the law, and right/wrong. Since establishing his large audience, he has chosen to sell out the truth and right/wrong in favor of attracting a larger audience, hoping that his initial audience doesn't pay attention to what he is doing. And it's all about him, his income, and the stream of 'Factor gear' products he endlessly and nauseating promotes every show. Sure, he is entitled to make this choice and conduct his business this way. But in doing so, he forfeited his credibility, and more and more people are waking up to this fact.
43 posted on 02/14/2004 1:47:59 PM PST by raptor29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Brimack34
"Remember this the next time you hear a liberal say O'Really is a conservative!!!"

O'Reilly is a moral relativist, that's why he is all over the map in his "beliefs".

He claims to be an "independent", but in actuality, he is a populist - claiming to be looking out for "the folks" .... an advocate for "the little guy".

But so does Nader. And so did every dictator / tyrant who ever lived.

I would have no trouble making a big bet that he was born into a DemocRAT family. He thinks like a DemocRAT

44 posted on 02/14/2004 1:48:06 PM PST by Matchett-PI (Why do America's enemies desperately want DemocRATS back in power?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Thanks for the ping(I think) Opposed to the death penalty
In favor of Gay rights, ESP adoption
Yeah he is a real conservative alright. Haven't watch or listnened to this big mouth boob in 2 years.
45 posted on 02/14/2004 1:49:20 PM PST by WKB (3!~ What's another word for Thesaurus?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: scripter
>>To many, O'Reilly has sold out.

How can one who's never bought in sell out?
46 posted on 02/14/2004 1:51:48 PM PST by Keith in Iowa (The only good news for Democrats is they could save $$ by switching to Geico.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Yes, how true!!!
47 posted on 02/14/2004 1:59:38 PM PST by Meredith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: scripter
Bill O'Reilly tragically bit the bait and once again displayed his personal bias... Fox News claims to be fair and balanced. Then let America hear the truth, Mr.O'Reilly, about homosexuality. Respectfully, do as you say – "We report, you decide."

Oh my gosh! Bill O'Reilly let his opinion out on his show!! Amazing!!! How dare he violate the sacred trust of "we report, you decide" by allowing his opinion to enter the no-spin zone? I am not just offended, I am scandalized.

48 posted on 02/14/2004 2:15:23 PM PST by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor29
But in doing so, he forfeited his credibility, and more and more people are waking up to this fact.

Well, I don't think O'Reilly's any different than he's always been. I agree with him sometimes, and disagree with him other times. He backs up his assertions with facts, and, when he gives his opinion, you know it's his opinion.

And, O'Reilly has the highest rated prime-time cable show on television and his numbers, when they've varied, have varied upwards.

For some reason, people at Free Republic thought that he was a conservative, and are now disappointed to find out that he's not. I knew, from the first, that he was liberal on some things, conservative on others. He's an outstanding interviewer, and his show is interesting. It doesn't bother me that he's not an ideologue.

49 posted on 02/14/2004 2:19:27 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI; Luke FReeman; MinuteGal; gonzo; JulieRNR21
Did anyone see Bill on the Good Morning America show---a week or so ago???

He had apparently promised Diane Sawyer, he would appologize, if no weapons of mass destruction, were found by McKay et al, in Iraq.
So there he was reciting his "mea culpas" ---and eating a large dish of "HUMBLE CROW" for the benefit of the "Useful Idiots"

He's a MAJOR "vescillating pragmatist" ----
and personna non grata in my home!!!

UGH!!!!

50 posted on 02/14/2004 2:28:28 PM PST by oldglory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson