Skip to comments.
US campaign begins to get dirty (WP says that if we had photos we wouldn't run them)
BBC ^
| 2/15/04
| Paul Reynolds
Posted on 02/16/2004 12:01:17 PM PST by Diddle E. Squat
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
To: GailA
The "we're voting for John Kerry" was too much for me! Only raised suspicions, rather than allay them. Sounds like the statement was written by someone with a campaign-staff mentality, rather than a journalist or lawyer or such.
21
posted on
02/16/2004 12:42:40 PM PST
by
Shermy
To: Shermy
I am with you, Shermy. I tend to trust the "sleazeball" comment more than the "I am voting for Kerry comment."
If I had to make a guess, I would say the daughter and the parents are scared and have backed off. They are dealing with the thugs of the Rat party, and that can be pretty scary.
I don't see any point in continuing this avenue unless something else comes up. I still want to ask Kerry how often he has contacts with his old buddy Ramsey Clark.
To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
Initially, a "tall blonde" was mentioned as the Kerry dalliance. All the pictures I have been seeing show a very brunette person. Where is the "Tall Blonde"?
To: Ingtar
Heck, what about Bush41 and the allegations of adultery concerning him?
24
posted on
02/16/2004 1:05:51 PM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: Shermy
Does anyone here have background info on Peter Maroney, Kerry's campaign finance manager. I've found this:
Peter Maroney, Kerry finance director. Maroney honed his skills under fundraising whiz and Democratic Party boss Terry McAuliffe. His resume includes stints with House Minority Leader Richard Gephardt and Rep. Joe Kennedy.
25
posted on
02/16/2004 1:05:56 PM PST
by
per loin
To: Diddle E. Squat
Even if someone came to us with photographs we still wouldn't run it. Sound familier? "I don't care if you have pictures of Clinton killing someone, you still won't get 67 votes."
F-in sleazebag CLYMER Liberals never F-in change. A POX ON ALL OF THE LYING SCUMBAGS!
26
posted on
02/16/2004 1:09:55 PM PST
by
commish
(Freedom Tastes Sweetest to Those Who Have Fought to Preserve It)
To: Diddle E. Squat
How about all the Newspapers hiding the Nascar vist by Pres. Bush??? USA Today even dug up Clinton to put on the Cover with a nothing story....In Mn. Nothing.
To: Diddle E. Squat
This smells to high heaven like a cover up.
To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
It may not be HIS particular staffer - the woman Identified as his staffer on that committee is a lesbian. Confirmed this morning. There is an article detailing her in the Washington Blade. So, either it is another staffer on the finance committee, or it is someone else - the discussion in the senator's office was that it was a finance staffer. I believe it was my assumption it would be Kerry's personal finance staffer, since that is probably the person with whom he has most contacts. And, maybe he has more than one finance staffer or a new one since the lesbian one is now a member of the Tacoma Park Maryland Council.
To: Diddle E. Squat
Neither of those papers are known for journalistic ethics--certainly not in my lifetime. But that said, it would be very well if the media returned to the more genteel policy of not printing gossip about candidates personal lives. One cannot imagine the Founding Fathers ever answering questions about their sex lives, to any reporter. And, frankly, one of the things that was most contemptible about Clinton, was that he did so.
We need to rediscover the importance of privacy; the difference between men's public acts and beliefs on questions of state, and the private lives, to which even public servants are entitled. Our perceptions on this point have been blurred because of the outrageous exhibitionism of those in the "Entertainment" industry; but it is not acceptable to treat anyone else in that light--and frankly, if I had a newspaper, there would be no room for the attention seeking exhibitionism of the former.
William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site
30
posted on
02/16/2004 1:37:53 PM PST
by
Ohioan
To: Diddle E. Squat
...Even if someone came to us with photographs we still wouldn't run it... Pathetic example of modern "journalism".
31
posted on
02/16/2004 1:38:10 PM PST
by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The democRATS are near the tipping point.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
All the news that's fit to spike.
32
posted on
02/16/2004 1:38:55 PM PST
by
mewzilla
To: Diddle E. Squat
"In any case, nobody would be too shocked if Kerry lied about an affair. Even if someone came to us with photographs we still wouldn't run it. Lying to Don Imus [the radio host to whom Kerry gave his initial denial] is not a federal offence." "... But now if you get anything on Bush, please call us!"
To: Diddle E. Squat
But they [Alex Polier's parents]
just endorsed Kerry. Methinks this W. Post staff apologist is a liar. They could be Republicans. They could have had their reasons for saying what they said.
To: VadeRetro
We need to let this go.
The Dem-Rats are just trying to suck us in like they did with Clinton.
It worked for them; it didn't work for us.
Let it drop.
35
posted on
02/16/2004 1:44:06 PM PST
by
LeftiesBinWhinin
(Democrats: The boil in the butt crack of life)
To: Ohioan
But that said, it would be very well if the media returned to the more genteel policy of not printing gossip about candidates personal lives. Whatever the rule is, we have to insist that there be one rule. Right now, we have one rule for Democrats ("Let someone else prove it, then maybe, maybe, maybe maybe we'll run it") and one for Republicans ("If there's an allegation, it's a story").
To: raloxk
actually it has plenty of relevence. 30 days before an election we won't be able to respond to such typical press hypocrisy.
37
posted on
02/16/2004 1:48:12 PM PST
by
KantianBurke
(Principles, not blind loyalty)
To: LeftiesBinWhinin
We need to let this go. It does look like a sucker play. At any rate, the "Hanoi John" angle has more national security implications. I hear Katie Couric is big on national security these days.
To: mewzilla
The introduction of Kerry's campaign finance manager into the scandal invites the suspicion that there is a money trail. The strategy is likely to be that it was not Kerry's campaign that made the payments, but the campaign finance manager acting on his own.
39
posted on
02/16/2004 1:58:35 PM PST
by
per loin
To: per loin
Well, he's already thrown one campaign aid to the wolves (whoever was
dating Polier). What's another one? What loyalty!
Though, now that I think about it, calling this collection of presstitutes wolves is being way too complimentary.
40
posted on
02/16/2004 2:02:14 PM PST
by
mewzilla
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson