Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FBI sacks translator who reported on pro-terrorist colleagues
Center for Security Policy ^ | Feb. 16, 2004 | CSP

Posted on 02/16/2004 6:39:05 PM PST by FairOpinion

The FBI has sacked a linguist who blew the whistle on some colleagues who cheered the 9/11 terrorist attacks and reportedly sabotaged translations crucial to ongoing terrorism investigations.

The report is the latest instance of high-level political correctness within the FBI, where senior officials have been pandering to Islamist fringe elements who are tied to terrorist groups.

Investigative reporter Paul Sperry reports, “Middle Eastern linguists with top-secret security clearance” at the FBI celebrated the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the United States and shouted: “It's about time they got a taste of what they've been giving the Middle East.”

Sperry reports that when FBI linguist Sibel Dinez Edmonds reported the incident and other “breaches in security, mistranslations and potential espionage by Middle Eastern colleagues,” she was fired “without specified cause.”

Edmonds’s supervisor, “a naturalized U.S. citizen from Beirut” reportedly told his employees “to take long breaks, to slow down translations, and to simply say 'no' to those field agents calling us to beg for speedy translations so that they could go on with their investigations and interrogations of those they had detained.”

Edmonds is said to have detailed these allegations further in a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee last month.

The Center for Security Policy has warned repeatedly over the last year and a half that the failure of the FBI to acknowledge the nature of certain Islamist groups and individuals, in order not to appear “insensitive," would jeopardize the Bureau's ability to protect against potential terrorist threats.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911; 911attacks; celebrate911; cheered911attacks; espionage; fbi; fifthcolumn; fifthcolumnists; islamofascism; islamofascists; nationalsecurity; paulsperry; securityfailures; sibeldinezedmonds; spies; taxdollarsatwork; translators; whistleblower; whistleblowerfired; wtc; youpayforthis
What's wrong with this picture?!

Here is the article they refer to:
Celebrating 9/11 at the FBI by Paul Sperry

1 posted on 02/16/2004 6:39:06 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Investigative reporter Paul Sperry reports, “Middle Eastern linguists with top-secret security clearance” at the FBI celebrated the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the United States and shouted: “It's about time they got a taste of what they've been giving the Middle East.” Sperry reports that when FBI linguist Sibel Dinez Edmonds reported the incident and other “breaches in security, mistranslations and potential espionage by Middle Eastern colleagues,” she was fired “without specified cause.” Edmonds’s supervisor, “a naturalized U.S. citizen from Beirut” reportedly told his employees “to take long breaks, to slow down translations, and to simply say 'no' to those field agents calling us to beg for speedy translations so that they could go on with their investigations and interrogations of those they had detained.”

Treason

2 posted on 02/16/2004 6:42:18 PM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
can this possibly be happening, with no visibility further up the chain of command? it just seems too unbelievable.
3 posted on 02/16/2004 6:43:56 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
Those should be not only fired, but jailed.
4 posted on 02/16/2004 6:46:19 PM PST by FairOpinion (If you are not voting for Bush, you are voting for the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
I wouldn't put it out of the question. A Pakistani employee of the city of Houston was caught sending just such an email. He wasn't terminated over it though (he was fired for using his work account to solict other employees for sex for pay).
5 posted on 02/16/2004 6:46:37 PM PST by weegee (Election 2004: Re-elect President Bush... Don't feed the trolls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Why hasn't this sacked person been on any of the mainstream media outlets with her story?

You'd think that the leftist press would jump on this one just to make the Bush Administration look bad.

Are the media types worried about being criticized by those terrorist-supporting, race-card-sporting CAIR and AMI groups? This is really shocking and scary if true...
6 posted on 02/16/2004 6:47:15 PM PST by demnomo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
"The FBI has sacked a linguist"

This article is obviously a false and malicious slander on great public servants.
Why, the FBI is under the supervision of one John Ashcroft, who, when he is not going after glass manufacturers, hemp food additive manufacturers, and reviewing porn films, has been such a strong defender of our country that he has said that with him in charge, we don't even need to worry about a Bill of Rights.

And he works for a Texan, who, at least going by his election year rhetoric, would leave no stone unturned to defend our borders, and has dispatched a few million of his compesinos over the border to check it out.
7 posted on 02/16/2004 6:47:42 PM PST by John Beresford Tipton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
bookmarking articles...
8 posted on 02/16/2004 6:48:28 PM PST by Donna Lee Nardo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
are we suppose to blame Bush? or Tenet??
9 posted on 02/16/2004 6:49:50 PM PST by GeronL (www.ArmorforCongress.com ............... Support a FReeper for Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demnomo
I don't think this makes the Bush Administration look bad in the liberal media's eyes--they fully sympathize with the terrorist supporters who did all these things and they probably think the FBI did the right thing!

Of course this is completely ridiculous, but sadly believable.
10 posted on 02/16/2004 6:50:22 PM PST by GatorGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: demnomo
It's been here.
11 posted on 02/16/2004 6:52:41 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
are we suppose to blame Bush? or Tenet??

Tenet is CIA. FBI is Mueller.

12 posted on 02/16/2004 6:52:48 PM PST by Tennessean4Bush (An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds, the pessimist fears this is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Tenet doesn't run the FBI.

I wish Rush or someone would pick this story up, it sounds insane.
13 posted on 02/16/2004 6:53:16 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

14 posted on 02/16/2004 6:53:21 PM PST by risk (PC investigations R us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Beresford Tipton
Ashcroft heads Justice not FBI.
15 posted on 02/16/2004 6:53:44 PM PST by Bogey78O (Why are we even having this debate?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: demnomo
And notice the Senate is not investigating this one. Apparently the whistle blower sent a report to the Senate Judiciary Committee:

"Edmonds, a Turkish-American who is not a practicing Muslim, made the allegations last month in a 9-page letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee."

The FBI not only didn't discipline, but PROMOTED the offender, who should be called a saboteur -- he actually deleted people's work to slow them down. From the Sperry article (see link in my post 1):

"Despite the backlog, Feghali told Edmonds and other translators to just let the work pile higher, according to Edmonds. Why? Money. She says Feghali, who has recruited family and friends to work with him at the high-paying language unit, argued that Congress would approve an even bigger budget for it if they could continue to show big backlogs.

"We were told to take long breaks, to slow down translations, and to simply say 'no' to those field agents calling us to beg for speedy translations so that they could go on with their investigations and interrogations of those they had detained," said Edmonds, who was fired without specified cause by the FBI after she reported breaches in security, mistranslations and potential espionage by Middle Eastern colleagues.

She claims Feghali actually tampered with her work to slow her down.

"My supervisor went as far as getting into my work computer and deleting almost completed work so that I had to go back and start all over again," she said.

Edmonds, a Turkish-American who is not a practicing Muslim, made the allegations last month in a 9-page letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

She also claims that Feghali threatened to sue the bureau for racial discrimination, but dropped the suit once the bureau promoted him, says Edmonds and other sources. The FBI, which like the army suffers from a severe shortage of Arabic translators, instated a bureau-wide Muslim-sensitivity training program after 9-11."

16 posted on 02/16/2004 6:54:25 PM PST by FairOpinion (If you are not voting for Bush, you are voting for the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tennessean4Bush; oceanview
Facts don't matter!!!

blame Cheney!! blame Rove!! Condi too! =o)

17 posted on 02/16/2004 6:54:45 PM PST by GeronL (www.ArmorforCongress.com ............... Support a FReeper for Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: demnomo
Why hasn't this sacked person been on any of the mainstream media outlets with her story?

She has already been on 60 Minutes. Is that not mainstream enough?

18 posted on 02/16/2004 6:55:04 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: John Beresford Tipton
Oooh, good rant! Too bad you missed the fact that Ashcroft doesn't head the FBI.
19 posted on 02/16/2004 6:56:05 PM PST by Theresawithanh (We can't afford to lose this war! Vote President Bush in 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: John Beresford Tipton
Sure, everything is Bush's fault.

The point is that over the years -- the Cliton years -- and probabaly even before that, the liberals succeeded in totally emasculating the intel services, focusing on political correctness, instead of doing a job. That is the real reason they missed the signs of 9-11 coming, and even after 9-11, they were more interested in doing sensitivity training, than catching terrorists.

THIS HAS GOT TO STOP.

BUT you also can't fire everyone at the bureau. But I think the head of the FBI better do a shake up, if not, he needs to go. Same about the CIA.
20 posted on 02/16/2004 6:57:44 PM PST by FairOpinion (If you are not voting for Bush, you are voting for the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
are we suppose to blame Bush? or Tenet??

That's a beginning.

21 posted on 02/16/2004 6:58:14 PM PST by archy (Concrete shoes, cyanide, TNT! Done dirt cheap! Neckties, contracts, high voltage...Done dirt cheap!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O
"Ashcroft heads Justice not FBI."

News Flash!! Stating the obvious.

The FBI is a part of the Department of Justice, which is headed by Ashcroft.

The Department of Justice is part of the Executive Branch whose head is a certain Texan.

Among things that they are both either ignorant of, or oblivious to, are Truman's words:
"The Buck Stops Here"
22 posted on 02/16/2004 6:58:23 PM PST by John Beresford Tipton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: John Beresford Tipton

"A Review of the FBI's Response to John Roberts' Statements on 60 Minutes"

Read it here.

http://www.usdoj.gov/oig/special/03-02/index.htm

23 posted on 02/16/2004 6:58:56 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
well, what are the facts? are you saying that no one in the food chain above this has any idea of what is going on here, or at least trying to find out?
24 posted on 02/16/2004 6:58:59 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
It's all about being owned lock stock and barrel by the house of Saud. Read Bob Baer's books. It's not just the FBI. The State Department makes the FBI look like super-patriots. The CIA does nothing but collect their paychecks. There is a reason the Presidents father gets $100,000 per speech from the Carlysle Group.
25 posted on 02/16/2004 6:59:20 PM PST by mercy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
"Sure, everything is Bush's fault."

Not everything, but it is verrrrry late in the day to be blaming his predecessors for screw ups as Bush ends his term. What did Clinton have to do with firing the whistleblower??
26 posted on 02/16/2004 7:01:14 PM PST by John Beresford Tipton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
am I missing something? the conclusion doesn't seem to indicate anything regarding the allegations of what may (or may not) have taken place regarding the actions of the translation bureau.
27 posted on 02/16/2004 7:02:38 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: mercy
Your accusations are ridiculous.

If we want to fight terrorism effectively, we need to stamp out political correctness.

"The FBI, which like the army suffers from a severe shortage of Arabic translators, instated a bureau-wide Muslim-sensitivity training program after 9-11."
28 posted on 02/16/2004 7:02:47 PM PST by FairOpinion (If you are not voting for Bush, you are voting for the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
I am saying they may not care.
29 posted on 02/16/2004 7:04:06 PM PST by GeronL (www.ArmorforCongress.com ............... Support a FReeper for Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Department of Justice Seal Department of Justice
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
FRIDAY, OCTOBER 18, 2002
WWW.USDOJ.GOV
AG
(202) 616-2777
TDD (202) 514-1888

STATEMENT OF BARBARA COMSTOCK, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS, REGARDING TODAY’S FILING IN SIBEL EDMONDS V. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE:

“To prevent disclosure of certain classified and sensitive national security information, Attorney General Ashcroft today asserted the state secrets privilege in Sibel Edmonds v. Department of Justice. This assertion was made at the request of FBI Director Robert Mueller in papers filed today in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The Department of Justice also filed a motion to dismiss the case, because the litigation creates substantial risks of disclosing classified and sensitive national security information that could cause serious damage to our country’s security.

“The state secrets privilege is well-established in federal law. It has been recognized by U.S. courts as far back as the 19th century, and allows the Executive Branch to safeguard vital information regarding the nation’s security or diplomatic relations. In the past, this privilege has been applied many times to protect our nation’s secrets from disclosure, and to require dismissal of cases when other litigation mechanisms would be inadequate. It is an absolute privilege that renders the information unavailable in litigation.”

###

02-605

30 posted on 02/16/2004 7:04:18 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
on the Carlyle group stuff, yes. But the stuff about the Saudis and the State Department, I've seen elsewhere.
31 posted on 02/16/2004 7:05:47 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
You can start the blame with Franklin Roosevelt who cut the first deal with the house of Saud. Then you can throw in every president since. It was a good deal for a long time. Lots to be said for cheap gas. Creates a lot of jobs and keeps the economy humming. However I think the victims of Terrorism around the world and here in our own country might argue with you.

Our controllers knew the Saudis were bankrolling the terrorists ... but they were pocketing so much money they just didn't care. The game has not changed ... thus this whistle blower gets the axe.
32 posted on 02/16/2004 7:06:29 PM PST by mercy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
Read the part "B. The Broadcast."

The Broadcast

The 60 Minutes broadcast containing excerpts of Roberts' interview aired on Sunday, October 27. The program mainly concerned allegations by Edmonds that the FBI had not translated thousands of foreign language documents and that the FBI's foreign language program was riddled with incompetence and corruption.6 (A transcript of the 60 Minutes broadcast is Attachment 3.)

The 60 Minutes segment also included an interview of Senator Grassley, who stated that he believed Edmonds was credible because people within the FBI had corroborated much of her story. Ed Bradley stated on the program that critical shortages of Middle Eastern translators had plagued the FBI for years and that the FBI had hired more foreign language translators after the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, but the FBI admitted that it had difficulty performing background checks on the translators. Edmonds said that an FBI contract translator had tried to recruit her into an organization that was the subject of an FBI investigation. Edmonds said she complained repeatedly about this other translator, but no one in the FBI wanted to hear it. Senator Grassley stated that the Edmonds case fell into a pattern of behavior by the FBI to sweep embarrassing information under the rug, then "eventually they shoot the messenger."


33 posted on 02/16/2004 7:08:16 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion; SJackson; dennisw; Salem

"The FBI has sacked a linguist who blew the whistle on some colleagues who cheered the 9/11 terrorist attacks and reportedly sabotaged translations crucial to ongoing terrorism investigations."

FBI wonder of wonders - ONWARD MUSLIM SOLDIERS PING!

34 posted on 02/16/2004 7:08:22 PM PST by Happy2BMe (U.S.A. - - United We Stand - - Divided We Fall - - Support Our Troops - - Vote BUSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
"The Department of Justice also filed a motion to dismiss the case, because the litigation creates substantial risks of ......

showing we do not know our asses from hot rocks?

35 posted on 02/16/2004 7:08:32 PM PST by John Beresford Tipton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
I'm tryin to tell ya. Just read Bob Baer's books. There is no mystery here. It's all spelled out. It's not about PC. It's about sucking Saudi ____.
36 posted on 02/16/2004 7:09:06 PM PST by mercy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
BUMP
37 posted on 02/16/2004 7:10:01 PM PST by kitkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
IMHO Sessions has been a total disaster ever since his appointment. He has done NOTHING to get rid of the clintonoids at the top of the agency or to turn around the politically correct attitudes that were encouraged by clinton and Reno. He has several times given medals to clintonoid stooges, like that guy who was promoted for covering up the TWA800 affair. And now this. I can well believe it.

The FBI has an obvious Muslim problem. They have very few Arab speakers or agents who can penetrate and report on the Muslim community, and from what I have heard the "double agents" they have working for them are probably giving their first loyalties to Islam and their fellow Muslims, not to the United States. There's reason to believe that some of these double agents were involved in the OKC bombing as well.
38 posted on 02/16/2004 7:12:40 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Skip to main content

U.S. SENATOR PATRICK LEAHY

CONTACT: Office of Senator Leahy, 202-224-4242

VERMONT


August 13, 2002

 

The Honorable John Ashcroft
Attorney General
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C.  20530

Dear Attorney General Ashcroft:

We are writing jointly in order that you might allay our concern about the status of the investigation into allegations made by Sibel Edmonds, a former contract linguist in the Washington Field Office of the FBI.  Although we understand that the matter is currently under investigation by the Inspector General, we are troubled that the Department of Justice, including the FBI, may not be acting quickly enough to address the issues raised by Ms. Edmonds= complaints or cooperating fully with the Inspector General=s office.  We are sending a similar letter to Department of Justice Inspector General Glenn Fine.

By way of background, Ms. Edmonds first raised concerns about security problems and the integrity of important translations earlier this year.  Unfortunately, nearly every person at the FBI who was notified of the situation reacted by questioning why Ms. Edmonds was Acausing trouble.@  Indeed, the FBI=s first internal security action in this case focused on Ms. Edmonds, instead of the allegations she raised in good faith as a whistleblower which bore on national security and the war against terrorism.

Ms. Edmonds has made a number of serious allegations, some of which the FBI verified were not unfounded during an unclassified briefing for Judiciary Committee staff on June 17.  First, Ms. Edmonds has alleged that a contract monitor in her unit (Amonitor@) chose not to translate important, intelligence-related information, instead limiting her translation to unimportant and innocuous information.  The FBI has verified that this monitor indeed failed to translate certain material properly, but has attributed the failure to a lack of training as opposed to a malicious act. 

That conclusion is directly related to Ms. Edmund=s second allegation.  Ms. Edmonds alleged that the same contract monitor once worked for an organization associated with a counter-intelligence investigation and that the monitor had contacts with a foreign national who was a member of the target institution.  Additionally, Ms. Edmonds states that some of the mistranslated recordings on which the monitor actually worked contained conversations by this same person with whom the monitor had such contacts and concerned matters pertinent to the investigation.

Even after verifying some of these allegations, the FBI downplayed the importance of this matter and seemed to imply that it had ceased looking into the complaints as a security matter until after the Inspector General finished their investigation.  Anyone who remembers the long-time treachery of former FBI Supervisor Robert Hanssen, would be concerned at this reaction.  For years, Hanssen=s bizarre actions were also written off as minor security breaches and unworthy of serious consideration.  If even routine diligence had been exercised earlier, Hanssen could have been stopped from doing untold damage.  The FBI needs to learn from its mistakes.

In addition to general concerns raised by this case, we have two specific concerns we wish to raise for your review.  First, we have learned that a person central to the investigation will soon be leaving the country  B perhaps before the investigation is resolved.   If you or your staff would like to know the identity of this person, please contact Inspector General Fine=s office, with whom Senator Grassley=s staff has been in touch.  This person may hold dual citizenship with the United States and a foreign country and may possess a valid passport issued by that foreign country.  Thus, there will be little or no assurance that the person will return or cooperate with an investigation in the future.  Based on these facts, we would like your assurance that you are satisfied that there has been and will be no delay that will prejudice, in any way, the outcome of this investigation. 

Furthermore, we would like your assurance that the Department of Justice, including the FBI, will fully cooperate in all aspects of the inquiry.  For instance, we draw your attention to the fact that the FBI currently opposes depositions of the monitor and her husband as part of the investigation into this case, even though the monitor=s husband never worked at the FBI and even though the military agency at which the monitor=s husband does work is not opposing a deposition.  Moreover, we understand that the monitor and her husband have signed a letter stating they will make themselves available for depositions.  It is unclear, then, why the FBI is taking this position in the wake of such important allegations bearing on national security.  We hope that you will ensure that the FBI is fully compliant with the Inspector General=s inquiry as it proceeds. 

Second, we are concerned about the most crucial evidence in the case B the raw material that was allegedly improperly translated.  We seek your assurance that the recordings will be properly maintained and promptly translated by a competent and independent authority.  That way the validity of the complaint can be quickly judged. 

We know that you share our concern that the FBI address issues bearing on national security in a prompt manner, regardless of whether or not they cast the FBI in a positive light.  Only by honest evaluation can the FBI learn from its past mistakes.  We thank you in advance for your cooperation in this matter.  We request a reply in writing at your earliest possible convenience. 

Sincerely,

            __________________                                    __________________

PATRICK J. LEAHY                                     CHARLES E. GRASSLEY

Chairman                                                         Ranking Member

Committee on the Judiciary                               Subcommittee on Crime and Drugs  

 


39 posted on 02/16/2004 7:13:45 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
So we cannot prosecute these traitors because of the risk of disclosing something classified?
40 posted on 02/16/2004 7:15:22 PM PST by GeronL (www.ArmorforCongress.com ............... Support a FReeper for Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
"August 13, 2002"

So what have they been doing for the past year and a half?!
41 posted on 02/16/2004 7:15:25 PM PST by FairOpinion (If you are not voting for Bush, you are voting for the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
pretty bad when we have to put our faith in Leahy to get to the bottom of this.
42 posted on 02/16/2004 7:15:37 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: demnomo
Why hasn't this sacked person been on any of the mainstream media outlets with her story?

It was in the Washington Post. Is that not mainstream enough?

43 posted on 02/16/2004 7:16:31 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Revolution
44 posted on 02/16/2004 7:18:04 PM PST by old-ager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
yes, but you know full well what it takes to get a story real attention. It takes endless coverage by the media, relentless reporting. An article here, an interview there, is not going to cut it.
45 posted on 02/16/2004 7:18:28 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
There's a lot of stuff out there if you Google "Sibel Edmonds."
46 posted on 02/16/2004 7:20:31 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Edmonds is said to have detailed these allegations further in a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee last month.

http://judiciary.senate.gov/members.cfm

MEMBERS

Orrin G. Hatch - CHAIRMAN, UTAH

Charles E. Grassley - IOWA

Arlen Specter - PENNSYLVANIA

Jon Kyl - ARIZONA

Mike DeWine - OHIO

Jeff Sessions - ALABAMA

Lindsey Graham - SOUTH CAROLINA

Larry Craig - IDAHO

Saxby Chambliss - GEORGIA

John Cornyn - TEXAS

Patrick J. Leahy - RANKING DEMOCRATIC MEMBER, VERMONT

Edward M. Kennedy - MASSACHUSETTS

Joseph R. Biden, Jr. - DELAWARE

Herbert Kohl - WISCONSIN

Dianne Feinstein - CALIFORNIA

Russell D. Feingold - WISCONSIN

Charles E. Schumer - NEW YORK

Richard J. Durbin - ILLINOIS

John Edwards - NORTH CAROLINA

47 posted on 02/16/2004 7:21:36 PM PST by BykrBayb (Temporary tagline. Applied to State of New Jersey for permanent tagline (12/24/03).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
Wow. First I've heard of it. I guess all that Kobe Bryant/Michael Jackson/Laci Peterson/Bush AWOL noise drowned it out. At least for me.
48 posted on 02/16/2004 7:25:22 PM PST by demnomo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza; PARodrig; rmlew; Yehuda; RaceBannon; nutmeg; firebrand; sauropod; hellinahandcart
ping
49 posted on 02/16/2004 8:39:07 PM PST by Cacique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Political correctness can be hazardous to a nation's health. Also Jews are not allowed to take these translation jobs and there are plenty of Jewish-American Arabic speakers.
50 posted on 02/16/2004 11:13:10 PM PST by dennisw ("Cuz we'll put a boot in your ass it's the American way" - Toby Keith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson