To: You Dirty Rats
Perhaps, he'd care to delay his ruling in a drunk driving case, or a kidnapping case? WTF is he waiting for, poll numbers to TELL him what to do? A LAW, IS A LAW, IS A LAW.
posted on 02/17/2004 12:38:14 PM PST
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
Perhaps, he'd care to delay his ruling in a drunk driving case, or a kidnapping case? WTF is he waiting for, poll numbers to TELL him what to do?
What's he waiting for?
He's waiting for the numbers to increase to such an extent that he can wring his hands and declare that any decision other than a "recognition" of the "facts on the ground" would be meaningless.
Think that's nuts?
Well, maybe it is.
But it's no more nuts than Arlen Spector invoking "Scottish Law" in order to protect Slick from impeachment, or The Supremes ruling on the basis of European case law so that they can ignore the Constitution.
We're through the looking glass, folks.
posted on 02/17/2004 3:45:16 PM PST
by Don Joe
(I own my vote. It's for rent to the highest bidder, paid in adherence to the Constitution.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson