Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court To Hear Birthright Citizenship Case
Project USA, Time-Out Project, Issue 180: February 17, 2004 ^ | February 17, 2004 | Project USA email alert

Posted on 02/17/2004 7:39:20 PM PST by CIBvet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 last
To: WOSG
Congress could change the law on how citizenship of naturalized citizens gets revoked.

But Hamdi was never naturalized. He's a "born" citizen.

It seems to me that the law of naturalization isn't what's at issue here, since that refers to prospective citizens only. Rather, it's the law of jurisdiction - whether Hamdi's "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States. Since you're saying he is a citizen, then he must be subject to our jurisdiction, and I would think would always be until he makes an official declaration renouncing it.

101 posted on 02/19/2004 8:31:48 PM PST by inquest (The only problem with partisanship is that it leads to bipartisanship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson