Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Troops move towards Angoor(Hunting Al Qaeda in Pakistan)
The Nation ^ | Feb 20 2004 | NA

Posted on 02/20/2004 2:26:42 PM PST by Dog

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: cajungirl
Yes, I sure hope so, got my fingers crossed, though November 1st would be better. That would guarantee about a dozen democrat coronaries and, therefore, remove a whole bunch of traitors and terrorists from the scene!
21 posted on 02/20/2004 3:03:32 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Boot Hill
What I'm noticing is that the names of the towns are linguistically indistinguishable. The entire nest of islamic a**holes needs to be beat to a pulp with a big American clue stick.
22 posted on 02/20/2004 3:08:50 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant; Dog
      "I'm sure we have a few spies over there."

A few spies? LOL, we've got a hell of a lot more than that inside Pakistan! Contrary to what the press has been feeding the public, we have 6 U.S. bases inside Pakistan and regularly participate in joint operations with Paki forces. Are bases range from Kohat, near Peshawar in the north, to Dalbandin and Pasni in the south, to Shimsi in the west and to Jacobabad in the east. Assets at these bases include battalion size detachments of spec ops, intel, a wide range of air assets, etc. Heck, our presence inside Pakistan is the only reason Mushi hasn't been assassinated (yet).

--Boot Hill

23 posted on 02/20/2004 3:12:04 PM PST by Boot Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
LibWhacker:   "The entire nest of islamic a**holes needs to be beat to a pulp with a big American clue stick."

I can appreciate the sentiment, and to the extent that they are Islamists, terrorists or just some idiot with a a gun and a hair up his a$$, I would agree.

But right now, for example, our forces are operating in the Khowst region, a traditional Taliban stronghold and an area notorious for massacring foreign forces (just ask the Russian and the British!). Yet we've only taken a few casualties and are getting significant help from the locals there.

That could change if we were to initiate a "kill them all and let God sort them out" approach to our operations. There is no middle ground here, you either work with the locals and take the time and patience to destroy only those that take up arms against you, or else you must take a Genghis Kahn approach and kill everything that moves, walks or crawls. And I do mean everything.

--Boot Hill

24 posted on 02/20/2004 3:40:27 PM PST by Boot Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
They aren't going to let us cross the border, and I don't believe they are doing the job.

Almost all of the major captures in this war on terror have been compliments of Pakistan. And we definitely already have folks on that side of the border.

25 posted on 02/20/2004 6:31:39 PM PST by Coop ("Hero" is the last four-letter word I'd use to describe John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Boot Hill
Yes, but they aren't where we need them in the border region.
26 posted on 02/20/2004 7:37:18 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
      "but they aren't where we need them in the border region."

And you know this how?

Where do you think the Kohat, Shimsi and Dalbandin bases are located? On the border! It appears that the Pakistan may have elected to make the South Waziristan operation a purely local affair (not counting the cross-border cooperation), but this is the first one, out of many current operations that does not have U.S. fingerprints all over it. We have joint operations inside Pakistan in the Khowst/Kurram operations, the Khyber Pass/Peshawar operations, to name just a couple.

--Boot Hill

27 posted on 02/20/2004 8:01:06 PM PST by Boot Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Boot Hill
Can you give me some links? Or do I have to take your word for it?
28 posted on 02/20/2004 8:07:20 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Date night, off to dinner. I'll dig up some links for you when I return.

--Boot Hill

29 posted on 02/20/2004 8:55:39 PM PST by Boot Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant; Dog
Brilliant:   "Can you give me some links? Or do I have to take your word for it?"

Here is a link to a compendium of information I wrote about the bases that U.S. forces occupy in Pakistan. Besides being a good backgrounder, it also includes five more links, which you should follow for greater detail. In fact, that whole thread (articles and replies) address some of the very things you've been asking about on this thread. Start there.

Depending on how deep you want to go, try Googling any of those six base names plus "U.S. forces" and you'll get more hits than you can handle. You should even be able to piece together a rough idea of the number and makeup of our troop strength at those bases. Keep in mind while you're reading all these sources, that despite all the claims from Pakistan to the contrary, we've occupied those bases continuously since the beginning of the Afghan campaign, in the fall of 2001.

Here is why these facts are not general knowledge.

Mushi is on the verge of being assassinated by the Islamist radicals that infest in his own government as well as Pakistan's own terrorists (oh, and perhaps a few extra terrorists that we somehow inadvertently let slip through into Pakistan by way of Afghanistan, but then hey, what are friends for?). The terrorists tried twice in December and nearly mushed our pal Mushi. Al Qa'ida's number two man, Ayman al-Zawahiri, issued a fatwa last September calling for Musharraf's assassination. The last thing he needs now is to run around his country bragging about how American forces are inside Pakistan and in control of the Paki nuclear stockpile and kicking Islamic butt big time!

Dog, I pinged you here because you always seem to have a ready list of good links. Do you have anything to add for Brilliant, that I might have missed?

--Boot Hill

30 posted on 02/21/2004 1:34:40 AM PST by Boot Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Boot Hill
Thanks for the info. I'll have to study it later.
31 posted on 02/21/2004 6:25:42 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
But didnt the dems say we are not concentrating on fighting alqueda.
32 posted on 02/21/2004 7:50:54 AM PST by afropick (been off the dem plantation since 1999 and havent looked back!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson