Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gibson's Family: Father Tricked Into Interview
newsmax.com ^ | Feb. 20, 2004 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Posted on 02/20/2004 7:04:44 PM PST by westerfield

When Mel Gibson's 85-year-old father, Hutton, told a New York radio interviewer Wednesday that the Holocaust had been exaggerated and that Jews were trying to rule the world, he had no idea he was speaking on the record, let alone being recorded for broadcast, Gibson family sources tell NewsMax.

When WSNR's Steve Feuerstein called Gibson's father in Texas, the family believes he misrepresented himself as a fan of Gibson's, saying he wanted to "congratulate Mel's father" on his son's work. Hutton Gibson says the caller claimed his mother maintained a Web site devoted to "The Passion of the Christ."

Feuerstein allegedly said nothing to Mr. Gibson about a radio interview.

With no idea that his comments were being taped, Gibson's father made no attempt to disguise his views. He told Feuerstein that the number of Jews killed in the Holocaust had been fabricated.

"It's all - maybe not all fiction - but most of it is," he told the radio interviewer.

According to the account obtained by NewsMax, the elderly Gibson talked to Feuerstein for almost an hour before asking for further identification. The talk host promised to call back with more details, but never did.

Feuerstein did not return calls for comment.

So far, Hutton Gibson has not publicly apologized for the explosive remarks. But in previous interviews, first with the Wall Street Journal's Peggy Noonan, Mel Gibson noted he didn't share his father's revisionist views on the Holocaust. The actor-director said he had friends who had survived the death camps.

"Do I believe that there were concentration camps where defenseless and innocent Jews died cruelly under the Nazi regime? Of course I do, absolutely," Gibson told ABC's Diane sawyer. "It was an atrocity of monumental proportion."

Asked about an earlier interview where Gibson senior offered similarly offensive views, the Hollywood star complained: "Their whole agenda here, my detractors, is to drive a wedge between me and my father. And it's not going to happen. I love him. He's my father."

Gibson's father's comments were the topic Thursday night of Alan Colmes' national radio show.

James Hirsen, a NewsMax columnist, was interviewed and said that Hutton Gibson's "statement is indefensible, but it is also irrelevant. Mel's dad didn't make the movie; Mel Gibson did."

Rabbi James Rudin of American Jewish Committee, who also was on the show, agreed with Hirsen's point.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: huttongibson; melgibson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last
To: CruisinAround
He's a holocaust revisionist loon. Anyone who says what he says gives me the creeps and needs to go visit Auschwitz or something. Mel Gibson is devout but I'm glad he didn't inherit his father's nutty ideas about Jews.
21 posted on 02/20/2004 7:31:15 PM PST by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
Yes, and forget about the other side.
22 posted on 02/20/2004 7:31:52 PM PST by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: westerfield; Dataman; dead; AppyPappy; JohnHuang2; Caleb1411
I've just been struck by a Deep Thought. Tell me if you agree. I'll phrase it as a pair of questions:

Why is it OK to go after Mel Gibson for his father's views, even to the point of hoodwinking an 85-year-old private man...

...but it isn't fair even to discuss whether Jews were involved in the death of Christ, two thousand years ago?

In one case, there is guilt by association with an ancestor; in the other, it is not even allowed to discuss the actions of ancestors.

How does that work?

Dan

(FOR THE RECORD: (1) If I need to say this, I don't think the actions or views of ancestors justify mistreating the descendants in either case; and (2) I think tricking an old man is low, low, low.)

23 posted on 02/20/2004 7:32:22 PM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: westerfield
Hutton Gibson might be a nut, but still it's pretty sleazy to deceive an 85 y/o man like that in order to do a hit piece against his son.

Amen. It's disgraceful and low.

24 posted on 02/20/2004 7:33:58 PM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
Looks like this guy took a page out of Abe Foxman's book.
25 posted on 02/20/2004 7:34:02 PM PST by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
The lower they go, the more glorious is the humble behavior of Mel in making the movie in the face of adversity,
26 posted on 02/20/2004 7:34:56 PM PST by Cvengr (;^))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr
My dearly loved Dad died at 86. I can't hardly imagine the blind, volcanic rage I'd feel if someone took after him because he had a beef with me. I'd... I'd have had to study up on jail ministries, I guess. From inside.

Dan
27 posted on 02/20/2004 7:37:32 PM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
Don't ask me, I still haven't figured out why Abe Foxman is making such a fuss over this movie. The reasons he has provided so far seem ludicrous to me. He's either using this controversy as a fund raising vehicle for the ADL, or perhaps he is just simply an anti-Christian bigot.
28 posted on 02/20/2004 7:42:04 PM PST by westerfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Comment #29 Removed by Moderator

To: westerfield

I still haven't figured out why Abe Foxman is making such a fuss over this movie.

1. Foxman and Co. make their money by scaring Jews into believing that everyone on the right is anti-Semitic.

2. Historical results of Passion Plays throughout European history.

3. Foxman and Co. are in the employ of Mr. Gibson to generate publicity for the movie. Granted, a bit far-fetched, but given the rather predictable results of Foxman's whining, some consideration should be given to this theory.

The reasons he has provided so far seem ludicrous to me.

Explain what seems ludicrous. Maybe I can help you understand something you don't.

He's either using this controversy as a fund raising vehicle for the ADL, or perhaps he is just simply an anti-Christian bigot.

Foxman is first and foremost a liberal with their innate distast for Judeo-Christian values and traditions. His personal history (he survived the Holocaust being hidden by a Christian family and then had to be "rescued" from that family by his father who "deprogrammed" him) might have something to do with his views.

30 posted on 02/20/2004 8:04:21 PM PST by h.a. cherev
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: per loin
In many states, recording someone without their knowledge is a crime. Any experts on those laws here?

My understanding: you can tape it provided one of the two parties involved knows that they are being taped.

However, broadcasting or even disseminating the contents of such a conversation usually is illegal.

31 posted on 02/20/2004 8:11:14 PM PST by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
However, it is more than a little ironic that the people, who had a big problem with one particular line in the film, are trying to take the "sins" of the father and apply them to the son.

I don't see the connection.

More to the point, Jewish (and by extension, Christian) theology teaches that G-D will visit the sins of the father upon the off-spring...I'm not exactly sure of the quotation but I believe it is to the "third generation". The meaning of the verse, of course, is not to punish children for the sins of the father, but to portray how a father's evil influence will affect his children and grandchildren.

Please note that I am (so far) speaking generally, not specifically about the elder Gibson or his son.

It is even more ironic that they are up in the air about Mel's father denying the Holocaust when they are trying to deny that some, not all, Jews played a part in the Crucifixion.

I didn't see that denial. What I saw was that they were saying the movie "blames the Jews" for the crucifixion (sp?).

Be that as it may, are you under the mistaken impression that Jews believe in any part of the so-called, "New Testament"?

32 posted on 02/20/2004 8:13:40 PM PST by h.a. cherev
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BibChr; Poundstone
Dan, I'm using your post to ping Poundstone to this thread. Last night, she(?) was demanding that Mel Gibson tell his father to shut up and demanding he completely disavow his father. Apparently, she(?) thinks the majority of FReepers feel the way she(?) does. Just wanted her to know...

FReegards,

Judy
33 posted on 02/20/2004 8:14:39 PM PST by Judith Anne (Is life a paradox? Well, yes and no...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
Nothng wrong with going after criminals. Seems like those going after Mel's father have criminal intent, IMHO.
34 posted on 02/20/2004 8:17:52 PM PST by Cvengr (;^))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: h.a. cherev
and then had to be "rescued" from that family by his father who "deprogrammed" him

Never heard that part of the story - it would explain alot about him though.

35 posted on 02/20/2004 8:20:57 PM PST by westerfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
ROFLMAO. Don't be an idiot.
36 posted on 02/20/2004 8:21:18 PM PST by Poundstone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Poundstone
What are you talking about? What are you laughing at?
37 posted on 02/20/2004 8:26:42 PM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: westerfield
Political correctness trumps the truth in these times. Truth can be awfully uncomfy, especially truth about unpleasant actions by mobs of persons of particular ethnicities. (Despite what you might wish, I'm not implying anything about the Crucifiction as I don't know shiite about it and don't give a hoot about this controversy.) Think when was the last time you heard the truth about the Los Angeles riots following the Rodney King verdict.

Books of history are re-written, unpleasant facts suppressed. why can't we all get along, all people everywhere are the same, etc, etc, Kumbaya, we are the world! That's what it's all about and not about some silly movie and the silly father of a silly actor...

38 posted on 02/20/2004 8:28:33 PM PST by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: per loin
In many states, recording someone without their knowledge is a crime. Any experts on those laws here?

There is a federal law that forbids broacasting any telephone call where both parties are not aware of the recording or broadcasting. Some states allow recording of phone conversations with only one person's knowledge, but the FCC says you can't broadcast it without the knowledge of all parties.
This is not to defend the comments of Mr. Gibson. Now if Mel's dad were a Satlinist, Mel would be given an Oscar before the movie was released.

39 posted on 02/20/2004 8:30:16 PM PST by feedback doctor (Anyone who walks out of THE PASSIONS neutral has made one of two possible choices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BibChr; Poundstone
I told Poundstone that there have been at least a thousand posts on the subject of Mel Gibson's father over the last few weeks, and that most were sympathetic to Mr. Gibson.

Ms(?)Poundstone took exception. So, I have pinged him/her to two threads today on this very issue. *Sigh* Poundstone finds this amusing, but feels free to make demands of Mr. Gibson with reference to his father.

Dan, I apologize for using you.

FReegards,

Judy
40 posted on 02/20/2004 8:40:44 PM PST by Judith Anne (Is life a paradox? Well, yes and no...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson