Skip to comments.The Devil's Director: Why Art Cannot Be above Morality
Posted on 02/23/2004 1:02:02 PM PST by Mr. Silverback
Last fall, one of the world's most talented movie directors died at the age of 101. According to obituaries, she was "daringly innovative" and a "genius." Not only that, but she was one of the first women to become famous as a director.
But there were no misty-eyed television tributes to this director and no posthumous film festivals organized to celebrate her career. And it's a safe guess that no one at this year's Academy Awards will share fond memories of the woman whom some have called "the devil's director."
In her long life, Leni Riefenstahl never lived down her 1934 documentary TRIUMPH OF THE WILL, which presented a glowing vision of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi government. She believed Hitler was the savior of Germany, and she worked closely with him to create what many people have called the greatest propaganda film ever made.
Riefenstahl would spend the rest of her life arguing that she was never actually a member of the Nazi party and claiming that she didn't know Hitler's real agenda. But it didn't matter. Nor did it matter that she was a brilliant filmmaker who invented techniques that are still used today. Riefenstahl's directing career was essentially over. Nobody would work with her or finance her projects. It would be forty-eight years before she was able to release one last film.
What's fascinating about this story is that the artistic community's reaction to Riefenstahl undermines everything many of them say they believe. It's fashionable to claim that art is above all moral considerations and that it justifies itself. So what happens to the director who fled the country to avoid being jailed for statutory rape, or the director who pals around with Communist dictators? What happens to the films that present a deliberately distorted portrayal of religion, or the documentary that shamelessly twists the facts to make a point that Hollywood approves of? They get showered with awards. Anybody who complains is reminded that artistic achievement trumps every other consideration.
But it doesn't, and the case of Leni Riefenstahl shows the lie. What she did is no different than what many others have done since her time -- using their talent to serve an immoral cause. It just happened that this one was one Hollywood disagreed with.
Sometimes artists have to be blunt and to open our eyes to truths that we'd rather not see. Some of the greatest Christian artists have done just that. But that's very different from whitewashing evil and lying about the facts. Just like any other discipline, the arts are subject to the moral laws that are written on our hearts. And when we don't realize that, we end up with films like TRIUMPH OF THE WILL.
Because of Riefenstahl's brilliance as a filmmaker some film professors still use TRIUMPH OF THE WILL as a teaching tool. I hope they'll continue to do so, so students can see excellence put to an evil use. We don't need another generation of artists who celebrate all kinds of evil -- from gratuitous, sickening violence to pedophilia -- all in the name of art. If Leni Riefenstahl's twisted masterpiece can teach people that art is not higher than morality, then "the devil's director" will have unwittingly done more good than most contemporary directors put together.
If anyone wants on or off my BreakPoint Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.
You've got that right!
And your point is...?
Nonesense. Our Bengal is a wonderful cat. He is friendly, active, and extremely intellegent.
Uh-oh, I think we've got a catfight starting up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.