Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ex-green beret to Kerry: 'You are a liar'
World Net Daily ^ | Feb 26, 2004 | By Ron Strom

Posted on 02/26/2004 5:37:05 AM PST by beaureguard

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: kellynla
Well it's been over 30 years in the making and I can't understand how the good people of Massachusetts could have ever elected Kerry as senator from their state

Mass has no trouble reelecting a killer as Senator over and over. Why should they object to a traitor?

41 posted on 02/26/2004 9:29:18 AM PST by LexBaird ("I don't do diplomacy." - Donald Rumsfeld)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: beaureguard
We all gave away our candy bars and rations to kids,

Isn't giving those rations to civilians a war crime?

42 posted on 02/26/2004 10:26:11 AM PST by sharktrager (The last rebel without a cause in a world full of causes without a rebel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Needs alotta exposure!
43 posted on 02/26/2004 3:15:54 PM PST by Taxman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer
FRaud on EVERY level?

Throughout his entire life -- what we have is Slick Willy redux -- deja vu (characterwise) all over again. And, further left than Der Sleichmeister.

44 posted on 02/26/2004 3:18:36 PM PST by Taxman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
The way I understand it, he recommended himself for and wrote the narrative for each of his "awards."

There have to be surviving crewmen who have first-hand information re: Hanoi John Effing Kerry's bogus "bandaid" purple hearts and Bronze and Silver Stars.

And, he ran out on them to boot!

First rule of leadership -- take care of the troops! When the troops are taken care of, then the "0" (if he is worth a sh!t) can take care of his own needs.

The troops he left behind when he claimed the "three purple heart" rule (bogus rule?) and shagged a$$ out of the combat zone have got to be pi$$ed, still!
45 posted on 02/26/2004 3:27:36 PM PST by Taxman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: beaureguard
you personally quashed the efforts of any and all veterans to report sightings of living POWs, when you held those reins in Congress. You have fought tooth and nail to push for the U.S. to normalize relations with Vietnam for years. Why, Mr. Kerry? Simple, your first cousin C. Stewart Forbes, CEO of Colliers International, recently signed a contract with Hanoi, worth BILLIONS of dollars for Collier's International to become the exclusive real estate representative for the country of Vietnam. Bendell says he has an expose coming out in the April issue of American Spectator that further details his charges against the senator.

WOW!! That's the FIRST I've heard of this cozy deal!!!

46 posted on 02/26/2004 3:32:17 PM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Kerry says all this stuff happened, yet he didn't REPORT IT?? He should be STRIPPED of ANY medals he may have gotten.

Speaking of medals, is there a report as to what his injuries were and HOW he got them?

47 posted on 02/26/2004 3:36:31 PM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
Kerry's bio is floating around FR somewhere and if you do a little searching I think you can find it. 3 Purple Hearts, a Bronze Star and a Silver Star in 4 months? Yea...right...the officers must have been writing those commendations for each other in the Officers Club. Ooops, a paper cut! Where are those forms for the Purple Heart commendations? ROFLMAO
48 posted on 02/26/2004 5:50:42 PM PST by kellynla (U.S.M.C. "C" 1/5 1st Mar Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi VOTE "NO" ON PROPOSITIONS 55-58)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: greenwolf
Can't speak for S.V. policy - but my Dad was a Colonel in the southern part. He normally worked 6 1/2 days a week, then spent Sunday afternoons helping at a nearby orphanage.

After his death in a helicopter in Apr 72, his brothers raised money and the oldest traveled to Vietnam to give it to the orphanage.

After the fall, my uncles tried to contact the orphanage. They never heard from anyone at the orphanage again.

The cause was just. The government of SV may not have been good, but it was good enoough to allow the orphans to be cared for, and to allow Americans to help.

My Dad's third war was his last - but I'm confident he never raped, tortured, or abused folks for fun or for policy, as JFKerry so slanderously charges!
49 posted on 02/26/2004 6:08:08 PM PST by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
Your relatives plainly did the best anybody could with the situation they ran up against.

The cause was just. The government of SV may not have been good, but it was good enoough to allow the orphans to be cared for, and to allow Americans to help.

For the sort of effort that got put into Nam, that in my view is not good enough. It's certainly not good enough to draft anybody into.

In Nixon's place in Feb of 69, I'd have called the joint chiefs into a room and laid out some sort of a law, like what if anything do you guys figure you can accomplish in Nam in a year starting from now, without using draftees in combat roles, without using vast sums of money, and basically just using the kinds of assets you use to play such games with, professional soldiers, soldiers of fortune, air power, our battleships, and special ops. I'd have had no qualms about any sort of an assault on North Vietnam under those rules. If they'd told me they couldn't accomplish anything in Nam in a year with those constraints, I'd have ended the whole thing immediately.

50 posted on 02/26/2004 6:38:52 PM PST by greenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: beaureguard
I've seen it on other threads that Kerry's been looking grey and palid lately (as opposed to his prior cheeriness?). He also took some time off for "a medical condition". Some have speculated chemo. So, he's going to wipe out Edwards on Tuesday. He's going to get everything wrapped up by the end of next month. Then, he's going to, once he gets to the convention come out and tell everyone thank you for the support, but he's had a relapse of cancer and please support Hillary! as the new candidate. She'll pick Edwards as her VP candidate. Edwards and Cheney will be tight debate. Hillary! will dodge any debate with George W. and get away with all kinds of slander. Have to go on a show? No. Why? Let her synchophants go.

Paul
51 posted on 02/27/2004 12:31:22 PM PST by spacewarp (Visit the American Patriot Party and stay a while. http://www.patriotparty.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson