To: Cathryn Crawford
I say this is using biologically-unique individuals for the trans-sexual agenda. Sickening...
2 posted on
02/27/2004 11:17:27 AM PST by
Pyro7480
("We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid" - Benjamin Franklin)
To: Pyro7480
I say this is using biologically-unique individuals for the trans-sexual agenda. Sickening...
No, anyone who takes graduate level biochemistry or medical courses is quite familiar with this phenomenon.
11 posted on
02/27/2004 11:35:31 AM PST by
aruanan
To: Pyro7480
Bullseye. While we can feel sorry for the unfortunate people in the article, it is no excuse for perversion. Separate issues.
22 posted on
02/27/2004 11:44:53 AM PST by
watchin
To: Pyro7480
You know, I read through this article twice - just to make certain that I missed nothing. After that reading and some thought, I agree with you. It sounds like they are making an excuse for those who, in adulthood, decide to swap genders.
Notice the "precision" of their statistics - between .2% and 2% of live births....
Wow - statistics with a window that wide are sooooo convincing.
Are there sometimes babies born with some really messed up gender traits - probably. Is it in ANY way common from a bilogical viewpoint - no. What the freak-show crowd would like do is blurr the line between biology and psychology.
63 posted on
02/27/2004 2:16:21 PM PST by
TheBattman
(Miserable failure = http://www.michaelmoore.com)
To: Pyro7480
I say this is using biologically-unique individuals for the trans-sexual agenda. Sickening...
its hard to say,in my opinion being intersexual is just like having a defect or disablity that was no choice of that person but rather just a twist of fate
as for trans sexual agenda,i have no idea what that is,all ive been seeing around here is gay agenda so its hard to find info on that
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson