Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

An Open Letter to Bob Brinker
Self ^ | February 27, 2004 | Alberta's Child

Posted on 02/27/2004 12:49:08 PM PST by Alberta's Child

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-67 next last
One of my infrequent vanity posts. All comments are welcome.

Oddly enough, Mr. Brinker's financial advice is almost always right on target!

1 posted on 02/27/2004 12:49:08 PM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
What network was this crap on? Who advertised on it?
2 posted on 02/27/2004 12:52:38 PM PST by NativeNewYorker ( Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
I love Bob Brinker. I have a routine for Saturdays. I work my butt off until 3:45pm (15 minutes before he goes on the air) at which point I put a beer in the freezer to super chill them. When Bob comes on, with his monotone droll, I sit and relax, nursing me brew. The man is hypnotic. After about 20 mintues I am out cold until 6pm, when the wife sends the kids upstairs to wake me for dinner. It's my favorite part of the weekend. Thanks, Bob!
3 posted on 02/27/2004 12:54:56 PM PST by RockChucker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
You be good.

I am bookmarking this thread in my Yahoo bookmarks for future reference.
4 posted on 02/27/2004 12:55:09 PM PST by Reelect President Dubya (Drug prohibition laws help support terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Excellent work!
5 posted on 02/27/2004 12:55:13 PM PST by chance33_98 (Check out profile page for banners, if you need one freepmail me and I will make one for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
That is a work of art!
6 posted on 02/27/2004 12:55:40 PM PST by netmilsmom (Don't put a question mark where God put a period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Thanks for that! I ehard him when he said this and I was shocked to hear what he said. Brinker has always seemed so level-headed. It turns out that's not the case.
7 posted on 02/27/2004 12:56:45 PM PST by isthisnickcool (Guns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Good one Al. I will keep this succinct report on 2000 Election for future discussions with my Dumbo-demos..
Thanks, EV
8 posted on 02/27/2004 12:57:17 PM PST by iopscusa (El Vaquero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
In New York he's on WABC. You won't hear him every Saturday and Sunday because that station carries live broadcasts for some sports teams.
9 posted on 02/27/2004 12:58:06 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Alberta -- the TRUE North strong and free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
Here's a list of radio stations he's still on.....I always wondered which way he went politically....now we know.

http://www.bobbrinker.com/radio.asp
10 posted on 02/27/2004 12:58:55 PM PST by goodnesswins (If you're Voting Dem/Constitution Party/Libertarian/Not - I guess it's easier than using your brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Wow. I certainly think you covered all the bases in that letter. Bravo.
11 posted on 02/27/2004 12:59:12 PM PST by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Why was Bob talking about the 2000 election in 2004?
12 posted on 02/27/2004 12:59:12 PM PST by RWR8189 (Its Morning in America Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
EXCELLENT rebuttal.....bookmarked!
13 posted on 02/27/2004 1:00:25 PM PST by goodnesswins (If you're Voting Dem/Constitution Party/Libertarian/Not - I guess it's easier than using your brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
In Chicago he's on WLS.

Same station that carries Rush and Hannity.
14 posted on 02/27/2004 1:00:35 PM PST by RWR8189 (Its Morning in America Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Well said. You do good work.

Brinker is certainly not on our side.
15 posted on 02/27/2004 1:00:36 PM PST by NutmegDevil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
looks like abc/DISNEY stations...makes sense.
16 posted on 02/27/2004 1:01:22 PM PST by NativeNewYorker ( Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
The topic of the 2000 election was raised on Saturday because he was discussing the potential implications of Ralph Nader's run in this year's presidential election (Nader was due to announce his intentions the following day).

Brinker correctly pointed out that Nader's entry into the race could help decide the race, and he used Nader's 2000 vote totals in a number of states to illustrate his point.

17 posted on 02/27/2004 1:03:37 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Alberta -- the TRUE North strong and free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: Alberta's Child
Fine effort and letter. I suspect it will not be read on the air, though.
19 posted on 02/27/2004 1:09:53 PM PST by truthkeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child; isthisnickcool
That's a great letter. In defense of Bob Brinker, though, he also said during that same broadcast that Nader entering the race was a good thing (for protecting the tax cuts)since it would detract votes from Kerry and thus help Bush. Since I only hear snippets of the show I cannot comment specifically on the subject of your letter
20 posted on 02/27/2004 1:12:11 PM PST by eeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baynative
Orman is a Gore supporter? Watch her numbers start to fall now. Talk about hypocritical.
21 posted on 02/27/2004 1:16:26 PM PST by goodnesswins (If you're Voting Dem/Constitution Party/Libertarian/Not - I guess it's easier than using your brain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: Alberta's Child
Wow, this is good. Thanks for posting and I disagree that this is a vanity post. Vanity posts begin and end with "I" sentences ;and, express feelings over thought or facts. Wish a newspaper would publish this.
23 posted on 02/27/2004 1:21:58 PM PST by Boxsford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
The ignorance of American voters about our system of electing government officials is a scathing indictment of our nation’s failure to educate its people about their responsibilities as citizens of this great country, but it is not a valid reason to change a process that has worked for more than 200 years. Anyone who does not understand how our system of government works ought to stay home on Election Day (along with all of those Palm Beach County voters who were incapable of using a ballot that even an average first grader could understand) and leave the governance of this country to those who do.

Very well stated! Worth repeating.

24 posted on 02/27/2004 1:24:27 PM PST by Boxsford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Beautiful! Are you going to send it to him? I would.

However, before I did, I'd correct two spelling errors in the fourth line in the paragraph you noted as 2.

Brinker has made some sizeable money for me, and kept me from losing sizeable money. This year, I subscribed to his newsletter, but after hearing him this past weekend, he's seen the last of my money.

By the way, while he was whining about Nader taking votes away from Gore, he might have mentioned that all that Algore had to do was carry his own state - or Clintons - and he would be President.
25 posted on 02/27/2004 1:26:32 PM PST by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
I suggest you run this back through a spell checker and then read it slowly and carefully. If necessary, have someone read it out loud to you. I haven't proofread it all, but the word "case" in boldface seems to be a typo.
26 posted on 02/27/2004 1:31:56 PM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
His call to get into the market last February was golden. I ignore everything he says except for his long term market calls.
27 posted on 02/27/2004 1:32:07 PM PST by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Excellent, excellent letter.

I occasionally listen to Bob Brinker and like him when he stays away from political commentary. I credit him with my decision to mostly get out of the stock market by September, 2000.

28 posted on 02/27/2004 1:33:31 PM PST by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
...so much so that Al Gore himself was moved in the last days of the 2000 campaign to sanctimoniously proclaim that the constitutional process must be upheld. It is amazing how few people today even remember that pompous crap.

Good call. Almost forgot that one.

29 posted on 02/27/2004 1:35:52 PM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #30 Removed by Moderator

To: jackbill
Thanks for picking up on those errors. I did this whole thing in MS Word before cutting/pasting here -- and it's no coincidence that the paragraph you mentioned was the ONE paragraph where I changed the text after pasting it! LOL.

What's confusing as hell about Brinker's attitude on this subject is that it directly conflicts with his own financial recommendations. He had been riding the bull market from the early 1980s up to the late 1990s, and actually announced in late 1999 that he was making "sell" recommendations to his clients (Bill Clinton was still president then). He then made his "buy" recommendations in March of 2003, after George W. Bush had been in the White House for two years.

If Brinker's financial advice has been as solid as you say it is, you might want to reconsider your decision to stay away from him. Under no circumstances am I trying to steer business away from him -- I'm simply trying to get him to "see the light," so to speak.

31 posted on 02/27/2004 1:37:31 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Alberta -- the TRUE North strong and free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Excellent piece. I have dutifully swiped it and put in my files.

Thanks!
32 posted on 02/27/2004 1:38:32 PM PST by PeteFromMontana (It's only news if it puts a Conservative in a bad light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: js1138
Thanks for picking that up. See #31.

For some reason the dashes from MS Word didn't translate properly, either. I think I'll see if the Admin Moderator can let me re-post this correctly.

33 posted on 02/27/2004 1:39:37 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Alberta -- the TRUE North strong and free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Great, great summary of the 2000 election. One minor comment based on my possibly erroneous information> You said: "While there is no question that something unusual had happened in Palm Beach County (Pat Buchanan’s 3,000+ votes were clearly an anomaly of some sort). Is is my understanding that Pat Buchanan's showing was not an anomaly at all. Two things, first, Buchanan actually received something like 15,000 votes in the previous election in that county and secondly, Pat Buchanan was said to LIVE in that particular county. If those are true, I would not consider his 3,000 votes to be unusual. Thanks for writing.
34 posted on 02/27/2004 1:46:49 PM PST by awjenni (Semper Fidelis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
I’m a subscriber to Mr. Brinker’s newsletter.
It is 100% financial advice and analysis.
When it comes to politics Bob should STFU!

I hope he appreciates you setting the facts straight.
Nobody likes to listen to an uninformed know-it-all.

35 posted on 02/27/2004 1:47:59 PM PST by Cyber Ninja (His legacy is a stain on the dress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Thank you for writing this letter. Brinker has been going off on this for a couple of weeks, along with the deficit, and touting O'Neil's book, along with the new book by Kevin Phillips (sp?) which he claims show how GW won the election by means other than honorable.

I owe Bob Brinker some respect, as he called it correctly in early 2000, and that kept me from losing $$$. But he has been a nutter the last two weeks on the 2000 Election.

36 posted on 02/27/2004 1:51:44 PM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: awjenni
I thought about that, but if Pat Buchanan himself thought his vote totals were unusual then I'd have a hard time arguing with him. Especially since that vote total apparently (I think) exceeded his vote total in any other Florida county in 2000.
37 posted on 02/27/2004 1:52:48 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Alberta -- the TRUE North strong and free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: RockChucker
LOL! Sounds like you got it made. Regards, O.C.
38 posted on 02/27/2004 1:53:54 PM PST by O.C. - Old Cracker (When the cracker gets old, you wind up with Old Cracker. - O.C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
The most inane comment from your radio show last Saturday was your statement that in future Presidential elections the Electoral College should be dispensed in favor of a nationwide popular vote –- ostensibly because "people simply don’t understand how the system works now." <<<...AMAZING!...Guess HE doesnt understand why and how we have an electoral college...(fairness to the less populated states, just like the reason for the senate)...he probably likes a democracy (mob rule) over a republic (rule of law) too!...Hope he puts more thought into his financial advise!!!
39 posted on 02/27/2004 2:00:31 PM PST by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Great post, I heard Mr. Brinker and agree that someone with time and data should take him on. He did at the end of the show take a caller from Utah and he acknowledged that the low population states are not the ones calling for an end to the electoral process.

One thing about the election, when Al Gore was driving to give his concession speech, he was called in his cell phone and told to hold off, that more favorable votes were coming in.
These late votes, (about 6 am eastern time) gave Al Gore about 300,000 votes to make the election so close. (I believe I have the values right.) There are few reasons for taking so long to turn in ballots, and I suspect along with many that some skulldugery was taking place and the folks doing it thought they had enough votes to put Al over the top. (Could they have mis counted by 590 votes?) Have you any opinion on this event?

PS, Bob's advice on when to leave the market is the reason I am retired now, following a fixed income investment strategy.
40 posted on 02/27/2004 2:07:00 PM PST by KC_for_Freedom (Sailing the highways of America, and loving it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
I often work Saturdays, which involves some driving around. As a result I hear Brinker from time to time (on KGMI 790 AM Bellingham, WA)on my car radio. I once heard him launch into a sustained rant about Bill Clinton's moral character, with references to his draft-dodging, horndogging, and financial corruption, that would have fit right in on Free Republic. This was while Clinton was still in office, probably in 1999 or 2000.
41 posted on 02/27/2004 2:27:38 PM PST by TheMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: KC_for_Freedom
Someone posted an article on FR last year that included a link to a great weblog article about the Florida election. The author of that article speculated that the "Pat Buchanan" votes in Palm Beach County were actually the result of fouled-up attempts at voter fraud.

Basically, his point was that Bush was originally in the #1 spot on that "butterfly ballot" and Gore was in the #2 spot, with Buchanan in the #3 spot. The way the butterfly ballot was laid out on either side of a center margin, the odd-numbered slots were on the left side and the even-numbered slots were on the right side -- so that #3 was directly below #1, #4 was directly below #2, etc. Bush was in the #1 position because the candidates were arranged in the order their party had finished in the last state-wide election (which I believe had been Jeb Bush's 1998 victory). Buchanan, then, was moved "up" from the #3 spot to the #2 position -- the top slot on the right side of the ballot.

After the original ballot was approved, the Democratic Party in Palm Beach County had Al Gore moved from the #2 spot to the #3 spot so his name would be directly below Bush's name instead of on the opposite side of the sheet parties did have the option of moving their candidate to a LOWER position, but not a higher one) -- they thought this would make Gore's name more visible to voters.

The author of that article postulated that most of those 3,000 Pat Buchanan votes in Palm Beach County were actually cast when a Democratic Party election official (or someone in the Gore campaign) was attempting to give additional votes to Gore but did so based on the original layout of the Palm Beach County ballot instead of the final one.

Pretty fascinating stuff, I thought.

42 posted on 02/27/2004 2:32:47 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Alberta -- the TRUE North strong and free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: KC_for_Freedom; Alberta's Child
Bob's advice on when to leave the market

Sounds like Brinker is as off-base with investing as he is with politics.  It's so hard to find a decent investing discussion group because everyone seems  to warp their economic views to fit their politics.  You'd think it would be the other way around, but there are so many Democrat Party freaks (as well as a lot of 'tin-foil' freepers) who throw their savings in down one hole after another because their political views require a 'bad economy'.

Their agenda really shows up when they flip out on Bush-bashing. 

43 posted on 02/27/2004 2:34:52 PM PST by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

Comment #44 Removed by Moderator

To: TheMole
That is true. I must give credit where credit is due . . . I will never forget that "rant" (it was actually a well-reasoned rant) because it was so out of character for Brinker to make such a political statement like that. I was actually in my car on Route 31 in Warren County, NJ that evening -- which meant it had to be around 1999.

After hearing that particular show of his, I was utterly convinced that the United States had somehow managed to survive an eight-year period in which the White House was occupied by a certifiable loony-tune.

45 posted on 02/27/2004 2:36:56 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Alberta -- the TRUE North strong and free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama
I think Brinker's advice on when to leave the market was sound. He didn't time the market perfectly (he was giving a "sell" recommendation in September of 1999, if I remember correctly -- while the market peaked in March of 2000) -- but anyone who sold on his recommendation in 1999 is far better-off today than someone who didn't.
46 posted on 02/27/2004 2:39:42 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Alberta -- the TRUE North strong and free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
I have one correction to make in your very good article to Mr. Brinker. Bob Butterworth was not defeated in the Attorney General race,he resigned and moved back to Broward to run for the state rep office which takes in Broward and Palm Beach co. He lost that race thankfully. Charlie Crist ran against and defeated Buddy Dyer for Attorney General. Buddy Dyer is now Mayor of Orlando,if I am not mistaken.
47 posted on 02/27/2004 2:41:54 PM PST by samantha (Don't panic, the adults are in charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: KC_for_Freedom; Alberta's Child
It would be useless for a computer show to just say 'stop using the computer' if you don't like this or that font.  They're supposed to tell you how to change the font.  

From 2000 to 2003 I averaged a 20 percent rate of return because I screened for low-PE 'rocket' stocks.  Even while the NASDAQ was loosing 3/4's of it's value, there were other sectors that were bullish-- and Brinker just says "don't invest"?

But hey, the only time I listen to Brinker is when he advertises his website.  I confess: my panning Brinker is like Andy Rooney panning 'Passion'.  It would help if I actually listened to Brinker's show before I griped.

48 posted on 02/27/2004 3:16:58 PM PST by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
good job.....

people like Brinker are like transsexuals.....you never know where they're coming from or which costume they'll be wearing....lol

I remember so well him calling the Toon the "smartest" guy in the world, or some such nonsense....

49 posted on 02/27/2004 3:23:12 PM PST by cherry (a vote not for Bush IS a vote for Kerry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Thanks for picking up on those errors. I did this whole thing in MS Word before cutting/pasting here -- and it's no coincidence that the paragraph you mentioned was the ONE paragraph where I changed the text after pasting it! LOL.

No problem. Notice that neither would have been picked up by Spell Checker. Spell Checker is as dumb as a DemocRAT.

My local station dropped Brinker's Sunday broadcast and I was in and out of his Saturday show. I've heard that he also bashed Bush by touting Kevin Phillips' diatribe against the Bush family and another anti-Bush book, whose name escapes me. Maybe O'Neills?

My subscription to Brinker's newsletter has not given me one bit of useful advice. "If you are going to invest in the stock market, dollar cost average". Duh!

He also has a "Bulletin" page on his web site, for subscribers. There hasn't been one since I subscribed - over six months ago.

The advice that he's given that has helped me has been on his program. Although he has recently limited his specific advice, he does eventually give it out. It may be a week or two later than the subscribers get it, but it's still timely.

I doubt that I'll lose much by unsubscribing and it will save me $185 a year.

His call on (I believe) Jan. 10, 2000 was extremely valuable. I don't know of anyone who timed the market as well as he did. I didn't get out as much as I should have, but I can't complain.

50 posted on 02/27/2004 4:10:43 PM PST by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson