To: Brian Mosely
I can understand why Gibson wouldn't want to be booed and why he's not going, but as a conservative who dislikes Hollywood, it would've been good for our cause to see them screw up by booing Gibson because it would've made people more aware of what Hollywood is all about.
8 posted on
02/29/2004 10:14:50 AM PST by
#3Fan
(Kerry to POW-MIA activists: "You'll wish you'd never been born.". Link on my homepage.)
To: #3Fan
No, I disagree. It's better than Mel didn't go to the stupid Oscars - then more people would've tuned in and boosted the show's ratings.
By Mel not going will guarantee another steep decline in viewership for the Academy Awards.
To: #3Fan
Mel doesn't have to sully himself to appear before his angry, hate-filled, hypocritical peers. The Passion's box office take alone after tonights Oscar presentation is answer enough to his hedonistic, shallow, limousine liberal, cash-loving critics.
28 posted on
02/29/2004 10:23:33 AM PST by
demnomo
To: #3Fan
I can understand why Gibson wouldn't want to be booed and why he's not going, but as a conservative who dislikes Hollywood, it would've been good for our cause to see them screw up by booing Gibson because it would've made people more aware of what Hollywood is all about.I was about to post something similar.
That act would have changed my disgust with Hollywood to outrage.
I've not boycotted Hollywood but I am choosey as to who gets my dollar.
123 posted on
02/29/2004 10:58:12 AM PST by
Vinnie
To: #3Fan
it would've been good for our cause to see them screw up by booing Gibson because it would've made people more aware of what Hollywood is all about. Yes.
165 posted on
02/29/2004 11:56:39 AM PST by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson