Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Marcus Dixon CONVICTED Ten Years for Child Molestation

Posted on 03/01/2004 1:03:56 PM PST by cyborg

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-158 next last
To: cyborg
What's the difference between 15.75 and 16 yearss of age?

So the age of consent should be 15.75 years then?

What happens in the next case when the girl is 15 years six months. She's only three months short of the new standard... What's the harm?

Do we keep on pushing the age lower and lower as we get new cases?

61 posted on 03/01/2004 2:46:09 PM PST by bondjamesbond (Never ascribe to evil intent that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
I'm finding nothing. News in ten minutes.
62 posted on 03/01/2004 2:49:49 PM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: snowstorm12
I saw the show, and believe she's lying to save herself from her father. Dixon is being railroaded with an outrageous mandatory minimum sentence. BTW, her parents did not appear on that show but Dixon's parents were there. If that was your daughter wouldn't you appear on the show?
63 posted on 03/01/2004 2:49:57 PM PST by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
It was not an attorney saying it, but the news anchor (a lady).

It would sure be nice to hear the GIRL say it. I've been searching and found nothing online to that effect.

64 posted on 03/01/2004 2:51:21 PM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
Thanks cyborg. It is an outrage.
65 posted on 03/01/2004 2:52:34 PM PST by Tribune7 (Vote Toomey April 27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart
It would sure be nice to hear the GIRL say it. I've been searching and found nothing online to that effect.

That may be, but I'm saying what was broadcast over the radio. Nothing more and nothing less.


66 posted on 03/01/2004 2:53:14 PM PST by rdb3 (Don`t be afraid doing tasks you`re not familiar with. Remember, Noah's ark was built by an amateur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart
the girl hasn't recanted her story and was on Oprah last week in an interview and sticks to her story.
67 posted on 03/01/2004 2:57:19 PM PST by snowstorm12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: snowstorm12
the girl hasn't recanted her story and was on Oprah last week in an interview and sticks to her story.

That doesn't agree with today's report. If ABC-News is saying she did recant when she didn't, her parents have a ready made lawsuit, right?


68 posted on 03/01/2004 2:59:22 PM PST by rdb3 (Don`t be afraid doing tasks you`re not familiar with. Remember, Noah's ark was built by an amateur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice
No, I am not the father of the 15-year-old girl and neither am I pitching a fit.

If this were a 40-year-old man then I'd say prison time was appropriate...but it's not. They're both in high school. Silly me.

69 posted on 03/01/2004 3:07:50 PM PST by Sender ("This is the most important election in the history of the world." -DU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
I have WABC on. The story wasn't on the news at the top of the hour.

Some copy writer might be getting spanked right about now.
70 posted on 03/01/2004 3:08:38 PM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Why weren't her parents on Oprah? Oh I know that would mean explaining what his feelings are about 'colored boys' as the girl said herself.
71 posted on 03/01/2004 3:11:27 PM PST by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: ping jockey
It is called induction. As an empirisist, I use it all the time. It is how you find new generalizations. Deduction is how you prove, 'em.

And when you use the word "illogical" as an incantation rather than as a real word refering to a real idea, it does my argument no damage at all.
72 posted on 03/01/2004 3:14:27 PM PST by Rifleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
Ten years in prison

During my two month stay in jail, I heard it called 10-do-2 or 10-do-1. You get sentenced 10, you do 2 or 1 years or some other number.

Still sucks, but it's a little more doable.

73 posted on 03/01/2004 3:15:37 PM PST by Lazamataz (Dangerously is the Sahara dust.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
That would make more sense to me.
74 posted on 03/01/2004 3:17:33 PM PST by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
I've searched it today and can find nothing in writing. As I said, I've seen some reporting after this became national, by people who didn't follow the initial case, and they tend to parrot the defense. Maybe some people feel comfortable assuming that an acquital means she lied. I'm not willing to make that leap absent a statement directly from her.

Caveat: if SHE says it then it changes everything. But to me her initial charge and her willingness to go to trial make this something other than an agreed consensual act that most of us agree should not and would not have been prosecuted.
75 posted on 03/01/2004 3:20:11 PM PST by BlueNgold (Feed the Tree .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: snowstorm12
Thanks for the update.
76 posted on 03/01/2004 3:21:31 PM PST by BlueNgold (Feed the Tree .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
He'll still be a felon, though, and he'll be on State Probation for another 8 years if he gets 10-do-2.

And in Georgia, the probationers try like heck to 'violate' ya.

Gosh, I sure have all that prison lingo down. =:^o

"See, I decided to doo-wap because they were servin' zoom zooms, and that guard, well SHE so cute I gonna shoot her down tonight."

77 posted on 03/01/2004 3:21:39 PM PST by Lazamataz (Dangerously is the Sahara dust.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
Why on earth are they under any obligation to go on Oprah?

They already went to COURT.
78 posted on 03/01/2004 3:22:37 PM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart
Why wouldn't they? That doesn't strike you as odd? If it was my daughter I sure would be on there.
79 posted on 03/01/2004 3:23:55 PM PST by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
I think it's sad.
80 posted on 03/01/2004 3:24:56 PM PST by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-158 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson