Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: upchuck

After a period of time, however, the dreaded “amnesty” word worked its way out of the Kerry lexicon on the subject. In its place -- the more refined and neater: “earned legalization”:

“I support an earned legalization proposal that will allow undocumented immigrants to legalize their status if they have been in the United States for a certain amount of time, have been working, and can pass a background check. This makes sense for the economy, provides fairness to people in our communities who have worked hard and paid taxes, and will also allow us to strengthen our homeland security by bringing undocumented workers out of the shadows.”

< -snip- >

As to Kerry’s opinion of the President’s proposed program: “We need comprehensive immigration reform; you can’t do just one piece. The president’s plan is a fraudulent plan. It’s fundamentally a plan for cheap labor.”

Harsh labels aside, Kerry finds himself bucking a President who is touting a plan that does not feature any sort of classic amnesty:

“I oppose amnesty -- placing undocumented workers on the automatic path to citizenship,” Bush said, when announcing his own proposal. “Granting amnesty encourages the violation of our laws and perpetuates illegal immigration. America’s a welcoming country. But citizenship must not be the automatic reward for violating the laws of America.”

Bush, among other things, wants to up the number of “green” cards that allow immigrants to work lawfully in the U.S. Currently about 140,000 “green cards” are issued each year to people wanting to migrate to the United States.

The differences between the Kerry Amnesty and the Bush Amnesty are largely cosmetic and semantic. Both would legalize millions of Illegals, and enable them to eventually get green cards and citizenship. Kerry's initial proposal would legalize more than Bush's, but the differences would probably narrow as either passed through Congress.

Kerry does seem to be a little more comfortable than Bush is in honestly calling his Amnesty for what it is.

Both the Kerry and Bush Amnesties are bad for the country, and need to be defeated.


32 posted on 03/04/2004 11:46:20 AM PST by Sabertooth (Malcontent for Bush - 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sabertooth
Kerry does seem to be a little more comfortable than Bush is in honestly calling his Amnesty for what it is.

Thanks again for your always erudite thoughts on this subject. Obviously Kerry is a paragon of honesty and should be supported. After all, we all know Bush is a RINO and must be flogged into submission .

Absolutely, Kerry is a man of principle and moral clarity. Thanks for calling that to our attention.

37 posted on 03/04/2004 12:09:33 PM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson