Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Facts Show 2.4 Million Jobs Created Under Bush
NewsMax ^

Posted on 03/06/2004 11:14:49 PM PST by MaineVoter2002

The Facts Show 2.4 Million Jobs Created Under Bush

The media and Democrats keep repeating it over and over: "2.3 million jobs lost" since President Bush took office. His could be the worst job record since before World War II, they claim. One little problem: It's not true.

Not only has there been no net loss of jobs during the Bush administration, there has been a net gain, even with the devastation of 9/11. At least 2.4 million jobs have been created since the president took office, 2 million of those in 2003. The gains more than offset the losses.

While Democrats continue to beat their election-year drums about outsourcing, manufacturing losses, unemployment and slow growth in employment, America's economy has been steadily creating jobs.

At least 366,000 jobs have been created in the last five months, over 100,000 of those in January, White House press secretary Scott McClellan has noted. And though the eight-month recession "officially" ended in November, economic indicators are surprising economists and pointing toward a take-off in the recovery.

The signs:

The 5.6 percent unemployment rate is the lowest in two years and below the average of the 1980s (7.3 percent) and '90s (5.8 percent), and still continues to drop.

The nation's economic output revealed the strongest quarterly growth in 20 years. The data for the fourth quarter of 2003 show that the civilian labor force rose by 333,000, while the number of unemployed in the labor force dropped by 575,000. Even better, the number of so-called discouraged workers declined in December.

Consumer spending grew between 4 percent and 5 percent last year, and real hourly earnings rose 1.5 percent. Real earnings have risen over the last three years.

Exports doubled to 19 percent in the fourth quarter, compared to less than 9 percent in the third.

The number of American workers is at an all-time high of 138.5 million, a level never before attained in U.S. history.

Jobless claims are 10 percent below the average of the last 25 years and still falling. Hiring indices are up, even in manufacturing. Productivity growth is extremely high.

Now the doomsayers are criticizing the validity of the unemployment rate, which at 5.6 percent does not fit their gloomy story. Faulty Counting The problem is the areas of biggest job growth are usually not even being counted at all.

Though 75 percent of jobs are created by small companies, according to the Small Business Administration, this sector's entrepreneurial activity and the jobs it creates are left out by Washington bean counters when calculating official new job numbers. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) does its Payroll Survey by phoning businesses to crunch the number of jobs that have been gained or lost. This is where Democrats grabbed onto their lifeline, the 2.3 million figure. Look only at the Payroll Survey, and there has been a gain of only 522,000 jobs since Bush took office.

But here's the rub. The Household Survey is used to determine the unemployment rate and accounts for those who are self-employed, and small emerging businesses that might be overlooked by the Payroll Survey. But the number of U.S. firms isn't static, and the "fixed list" used by the BLS for phoning established businesses does not reflect new entrepreneurial activity.

People are called at home and asked if they have jobs, or if they are in the market for a job. In contrast to the Payroll Survey, the Household Survey shows that 2.4 million jobs have been created so far during Bush's time in office. As Economy.com writer Haseeb Ahmed recently wrote, "something is amiss in the [Payroll] survey."

Credit Where Credit Is Due

That's not all. When doomsayers, and media spoiling for a fight in an election year, laughed at Bush's prediction of 2.6 million new jobs this year, not everyone was scoffing.

Ahmed, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan and others hardly batted an eye. Greenspan said it was "probably feasible" the economy would reach the Bush administration's forecast of adding 2.6 million jobs this year, provided growth continues and the productivity rate slows to more typically levels.

"I don't think it's 'Fantasyland,'" Greenspan said. "I agree with him," said John Ryding, chief market economist at Bear Stearns. "I think that we will create 2.5 million, possibly more, jobs over the balance of the year."

Ahmed is convinced that "the revision patterns of the early-1990s recovery cycle" will be repeated. A total of 1.4 million job gains were revised upward to 2.9 million in the first 21 months after the end of the last recession, just after Bush Sr. was voted out of office.

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/2/25/171833.shtml

If elected, will John Kerry get credit for the jobs created under the Bush administration?

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: busheconomy; bushrecovery; gop; jobcreation; jobs; liberalmedia; taxcuts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-159 next last
To: Texasforever; Mo1; dixiechick2000; Howlin
LOL I am just in a onrey mood tonight.

That's when you really shine and get all of us laughing, ain't that right girlfriends?

41 posted on 03/07/2004 12:10:17 AM PST by onyx (Kerry' s a Veteran, but so were Lee Harvey Oswald, Jeffrey Dahmer, and Timothy McVeigh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
You mean to tell me it wasn't faked on a Hollywood sound stage?

No it was real but the landings were actually done by illegal aliens.

42 posted on 03/07/2004 12:11:03 AM PST by Texasforever (When democrats attack it is called campaigning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: PeoplesRepublicOfWashington
You're correct and they have a big habit of pulling out old plays from their game book
43 posted on 03/07/2004 12:11:48 AM PST by Mo1 (Do you want a president who injects poison into his skull for vanity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Cripes...and this was a new keyboard!
44 posted on 03/07/2004 12:11:55 AM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: onyx; Texasforever
Let's just say there is a reason why I try and stay on his good side :0)
45 posted on 03/07/2004 12:13:16 AM PST by Mo1 (Do you want a president who injects poison into his skull for vanity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
LOL!!
46 posted on 03/07/2004 12:14:06 AM PST by Mo1 (Do you want a president who injects poison into his skull for vanity?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Pickings are kind of slim tonight. I think they are all in a bunker conference picking out their spring camouflage pattern.
47 posted on 03/07/2004 12:14:51 AM PST by Texasforever (When democrats attack it is called campaigning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Let's just say there is a reason why I try and stay on his good side :0)

Blush

48 posted on 03/07/2004 12:16:47 AM PST by Texasforever (When democrats attack it is called campaigning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Pickings are kind of slim tonight. I think they are all in a bunker conference picking out their spring camouflage pattern.

LOL. I'll say the pickings are slim. It's early, there's still hope. :)

49 posted on 03/07/2004 12:16:57 AM PST by onyx (Kerry' s a Veteran, but so were Lee Harvey Oswald, Jeffrey Dahmer, and Timothy McVeigh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
There are still some around on the semi-hourly Jorge Bush sold us out to the Mexican threads. How many ways are they to distort this story.
50 posted on 03/07/2004 12:18:43 AM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

In English or Spanish?
51 posted on 03/07/2004 12:19:42 AM PST by onyx (Kerry' s a Veteran, but so were Lee Harvey Oswald, Jeffrey Dahmer, and Timothy McVeigh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Cripes...and this was a new keyboard!

I use an etch-a-sketch myself. It reboots realy easy.

52 posted on 03/07/2004 12:19:48 AM PST by Texasforever (When democrats attack it is called campaigning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: onyx
I DID ping him. He said it felt good. ;o)
53 posted on 03/07/2004 12:20:12 AM PST by dixiechick2000 (President Bush is a mensch in cowboy boots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
There are still some around on the semi-hourly Jorge Bush sold us out to the Mexican threads.

They are cute ain't they?

54 posted on 03/07/2004 12:21:43 AM PST by Texasforever (When democrats attack it is called campaigning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: dixiechick2000; Texasforever
I DID ping him. He said it felt good. ;o)

Oooooooh, he said that? LOL!

55 posted on 03/07/2004 12:22:30 AM PST by onyx (Kerry' s a Veteran, but so were Lee Harvey Oswald, Jeffrey Dahmer, and Timothy McVeigh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Yeah but being "bumped" is really a trip.
56 posted on 03/07/2004 12:23:34 AM PST by Texasforever (When democrats attack it is called campaigning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever; dixiechick2000
Yeah but being "bumped" is really a trip.

ROFLOL.

57 posted on 03/07/2004 12:24:54 AM PST by onyx (Kerry' s a Veteran, but so were Lee Harvey Oswald, Jeffrey Dahmer, and Timothy McVeigh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: dixiechick2000
If in the summer of 2000 Clinton and the democrats lied about the state of the economy and denied that we were headed towards a recession, why would the democrats not lie and not deny the 2.4 million jobs created under Bush now?

The question is, will the republicans allow Kerry and the democrats to define the state of our economy like they did in 2000?

It's time to counter the democrat lies that are flooding the Usenet newsgroups with all the wonderful posts found here at FreeRepublic.

http://members.tripod.com/~jednet207/PoliticalNewsGroups-PC.html
58 posted on 03/07/2004 12:26:40 AM PST by MaineVoter2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MaineVoter2002
Yep, well, the Democrats won't admit the economy was starting to tank 18 months before W took office. Even a 5 year chart of the stock markets will show the indicator of a southbound economy shortly before 2000.
59 posted on 03/07/2004 12:26:55 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Liberalism is Communism one drink at a time. - P.J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
How many ways are they to distort this story.

How many ways are there to skin a cat? I have never seen so much fear of bus-boys in my life.

60 posted on 03/07/2004 12:28:49 AM PST by Texasforever (When democrats attack it is called campaigning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-159 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson