What a question, so pregnant with possibility without progeny or responsibility. The timing couldn't be better. The left advocates as if this is the epitome of Western Civilization while the Social Security trust fund, the Ponzi scheme of all time that demands a constant infusion of new contributors, approaches the precipice.
We're told not to be intolerant of same sex marriages as the rate of divorce in heterosexuals is so high, 50% or more, and there's so much promiscuity in heterosexual marriages. We're expected to ignore the famous promiscuity of homosexuals at the same time homosexual transmission of HIV/AIDS is responsible for the majority of cases in this country.
We're told with a straight face that same sex marriage, supposedly because of it's binary arrangement, doesn't necessarily mean other arrangements are permissible or inevitable. But why not polygamy or polyandry when that's what those folks want, and we must make up for the lack of progeny in same sex marriages and meet the demands of Social Security. We need more bodies to contribute to Social Security, whether by procreation or immigration.
Why must incestuous relations be forbidden if the dominant individual really needs to have sex with another member of the family who's not the spouse? They can use condoms, birth control or abortions to avoid genetic mishaps. Any psychological trauma should receive appropriate therapy from any society that really cares for its members.
What's wrong with really loving your little Fido. The critter must enjoy it as much as you. There's no problem with transmitting pathogens between species. We have antibiotics and 21st century science.
God help us, please. Between socialism and hedonism, if this is the epitome of Western Civilization we are doomed, or should be.