Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jackbob
Cute. But there was no "substantive argument." I was responding to a "flippant" false analogy.

OK. I'll assume your original response to the article was satire.

16 posted on 03/21/2004 5:53:05 AM PST by tacticalogic (Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic
In #9, I write a complementary reply about the article, stating a few of my passing thoughts that came to mind.

In #10, I get a sarcastic irrelevant responce to what I had said. No problem, I answered in kind.

Then you come into it, sarcasticly accusing me of not making a substantive argument. Of course you were quite correct. There was no argument to start with. Pointing that fact out to you, has obviously (as seen by your last reply), ruffled your feathers bit.

I cannot imagine why my original comment would upset anyone's sensitivities. Since I am obviously wrong about this, I apologize.

Sorry.

17 posted on 03/21/2004 2:07:08 PM PST by jackbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson