Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/13/2004 7:08:21 PM PST by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: churchillbuff
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! It has begun!! Lord have mercy on us.
2 posted on 03/13/2004 7:11:27 PM PST by momfirst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
Calling Margaret Lewis-Marshall

Calling Margaret Lewis-Marshall

Calling Margaret Lewis-Marshall

Calling Margaret Lewis-Marshall

Calling Margaret Lewis-Marshall

Calling Margaret Lewis-Marshall

Calling Margaret Lewis-Marshall

Calling Margaret Lewis-Marshall

4 posted on 03/13/2004 7:12:49 PM PST by Diogenesis (If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
The other goal is to "push the parameters of sex, sexuality and family, and in the process transform the very fabric of society."

That didn't take long, now did it. After polygamy, will come man-boy marriage. After man-boy, will come incestuous marriage. After incestuous, will come bestiality marriage. After bestiality, will come necrophilia marriage.

It will all add up to the death of civilization.

5 posted on 03/13/2004 7:15:13 PM PST by SpyGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
Those parameters are too limiting. What about marriage with imaginary friends?
7 posted on 03/13/2004 7:16:27 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (Why the long face, John?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
post-Christian west
8 posted on 03/13/2004 7:16:52 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of it!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
Wants to marry chair
9 posted on 03/13/2004 7:17:09 PM PST by jwalburg (Gimli supports Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
"The other goal is to 'push the parameters of sex, sexuality and family,' and in the process transform the very fabric of society."

Push the parameters of sex huh? Does that include children being sexually abused by family members and strangers as well? This whole things makes me sick!!!!!
10 posted on 03/13/2004 7:17:36 PM PST by Arpege92 (This will be a monumental struggle of GOOD -vs- evil, but GOOD will prevail. - - George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
Leftist lawyers are a Satanic cult.
11 posted on 03/13/2004 7:18:34 PM PST by Free ThinkerNY (((Stand and Fight the Left)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
a network of men and women who share sexual relations.

Oh...the Charles Manson model.

13 posted on 03/13/2004 7:20:19 PM PST by Palladin (Proud to be a FReeper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Xenalyte; Lazamataz
'Bout time! Who's our fourth?
14 posted on 03/13/2004 7:20:39 PM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
...health benefits and legal rights.

See, that's what this is all about - benefits. If people would just keep their hands out of other peoples' pockets, and mind their own damn business, none of this hoo-haw would even be happening.

I guess government is just too addictive for them to stop unless they're forced to, though.

15 posted on 03/13/2004 7:21:47 PM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
Saying that children need mothers and fathers might come to be regarded as a form of hate speech, he adds.

This is one aspect no one talks about. Scary!

17 posted on 03/13/2004 7:22:32 PM PST by jwalburg (Gimli supports Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
The other goal is to "push the parameters of sex, sexuality and family, and in the process transform the very fabric of society."

Wow. They're not usually this blunt about it.

20 posted on 03/13/2004 7:24:30 PM PST by squidly (I have always felt that a politician is to be judged by the animosity he excites among his opponents)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
No one is denying any gay person the right to get married

All they need to do is find someone of the opposite sex to be married to them.

Marriage is defined as the union of a man and a woman.

22 posted on 03/13/2004 7:31:03 PM PST by syriacus (Time to repeal the 22nd Amendment. Give Bush three or four terms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff; GatorGirl; maryz; *Catholic_list; afraidfortherepublic; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; ...
Dilemma at San Francisco City Hall Marriage License Office

Political Correctness and a Discrimination-free Society for All!!

(A possible future scene at City Hall in San Francisco)


"Next."
"Good morning. We want to apply for a marriage license."
"Names?"
"Tim and Jim Jones."
"Jones? Are you related? I see a resemblance."
"Yes, we're brothers."
"Brothers? You can't get married."
"Why not? Aren't you giving marriage licenses to same gender couples?"

"Yes, thousands. But we haven't had any siblings. That's incest!"
"Incest? No, we are not gay."
"Not gay? Then why do you want to get married?"
"For the financial benefits, of course. And we do love each other.
Besides, we don't have any other prospects."
"But we're issuing marriage licenses to gay and lesbian couples who've been denied equal protection under the law. If you are not gay, you can get married to a woman."
"Wait a minute. A gay man has the same opportunity to marry a woman as I have. But just because I'm straight doesn't mean I want to marry a woman. I want to marry Jim."
"And I want to marry Tim, Are you going to discriminate against us just because we are not gay?"
"All right, all right. I'll give you your license.


Next.
"Hi. We are here to get married."
"Names?"
"John Smith, Jane James, Robert Green, and June Johnson."
"Who wants to marry whom?"
"We all want to marry each other."
"But there are four of you!"
"That's right. You see, we're all bisexual. I love Jane and Robert, Jane loves me and June, June loves Robert and Jane, and Robert loves June and me.
All of us getting married together is the only way that we can express our sexual preferences in a marital relationship."
"But we've only been granting licenses to gay and lesbian couples."
"So you're discriminating against bisexuals!"
"No, it's just that, well, the traditional idea of marriage is that it's just for couples."
"Since when are you standing on tradition?"
"Well, I mean, you have to draw the line somewhere."
"Who says? You didn't draw the line at tradition marriage.
There's no logical reason to limit marriage to couples only.
The more the better. Besides, we demand our rights! The mayor says the constitution guarantees equal protection under the law. Give us a marriage license!"
"All right, all right, here's your license."


"Next,"
"Hello, I would like to marry my dog"
"What!! Marry your dog --are your crazy?"
"How dare you insult me and my dog."
"But, you cannot marry your dog!"
"Who says so? I want my consitutional rights. You marry everyone else so you must marry me and Fido. I'll sue you if you deny me my rights."
"All Right, All Right here's your license"


"Next."
"Hello, I'd like a marriage license."
"In what names?"
"David Deets."
"And the other man?"
"That's all. I want to marry myself."
"Marry yourself? What do you mean?"
"Well, my psychiatrist says I have a dual personality, so I want to marry the two together. Maybe I can file a joint income-tax return. I have constitutional rights!!"



Think about it................

23 posted on 03/13/2004 7:40:21 PM PST by narses (If you want OFF or ON my Ping list, please email me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff

YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE----HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWW!!!!!!

24 posted on 03/13/2004 7:41:10 PM PST by AdamSelene235
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
She's barnyardaphobic.
26 posted on 03/13/2004 7:53:10 PM PST by jwalsh07 (We're bringing it on John but you can't handle the truth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
From what I remember of anthropology, every society that has lasted long enough to write about has recognized the concept of a marriage as being between one man and one or more women; while many societies limit the number of women to one, that limitation is not nearly so universal as the requirements that there be exactly one man and at least one woman.

Indeed, I would suggest that the question of whether polygyny should be allowed is in many ways not so much a moral issue as a practical one. Since multiple men cannot share a woman (if they did, they wouldn't know whose children were whose) then unless there are many more women than men, allowing some men to have multiple wives would produce a shortage of women.

To be sure, women are well within their rights to insist that they be their husband's sole love interest, and I suspect the vast majority of women would so insist. But polygyny is far less morally dubious than the 'same sex marriage' notions that have been being pused lately.

27 posted on 03/13/2004 7:55:16 PM PST by supercat (Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
"Saying that children need mothers and fathers might come to be regarded as a form of hate speech, he adds."

You start out with gay marriage and pretty soon saying out loud what was common sense for the last 10,000 years is now a form of hate speech. I know where this leads. All speech other than politically correct speed makes you subject to criminal prosecution. During the 1921 famine in Russia it was a capital offense to use the word famine to refer to the famine. That's why hate speech laws (and gay marriage) are bad ideas.

28 posted on 03/13/2004 7:55:42 PM PST by DentsRun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
This is wrong on about 7 different levels. The descent in to h*ll continues.
29 posted on 03/13/2004 8:02:42 PM PST by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson