Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Remember the Alamo
The Vanguard ^ | March 12, 2004 | Rod D. Martin

Posted on 03/15/2004 4:01:23 AM PST by aardvark1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: risk
IMHO, it's time to put the newspapers down, turn out the lights and the TV, and go get 'em. Shoot 'em all, let God sort it out. Re-establish the United States of America and get away from Amerika.
21 posted on 03/15/2004 6:25:17 AM PST by dixierat (Just a white boy lookin' for a place to do my thing....(Merle Haggard))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: risk
It won't be long now. Claire Wolf's "awkward period" is just about over.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

22 posted on 03/15/2004 6:27:26 AM PST by wku man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aardvark1
The new Alamo movie's director is "Happy Days" and "Andy Griffith's" Ron Howard.

He's one of the producers, not the director.

The director is John Lee Hancock, producers are Mark Johnson and Ron Howard.

23 posted on 03/15/2004 6:34:34 AM PST by al_c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wku man; Travis McGee; Squantos; Grampa Dave; Yehuda; yonif
It won't be long now. Claire Wolf's "awkward period" is just about over.

The problem with that end to the "awkward period" is that we could end up with Lew Rockwell followers in charge. Here's acomment from Ms. Wolfe's blog:

It doesn't matter a damn whether it's flying planes into the Pentagon or dropping bombs from planes onto Afghani children. Doesn't matter a damn whether it's blowing up trains and office buildings or whacking the arms and legs off little Iraqi boys. It's all done by people who think something else in this world trumps the rights, and the value, of individuals.
She's calmly equating our war on terror with the WTC attacks. She also tries to suggest that strategic weapons are off limits in the terror war. She all but apologizes for our use of atomic weapons and incindiary bombs against civilians during WWII. Elsewhere she links to a sneaky Lew Rockwell site article that blasts President Bush's bipartisanship, as well.

What we see here is the best argument I can find for winning back our country with the pen so that we don't have to use the sword.

I'm for extending this "awkward period" by reelecting President Bush, swinging the pendulum back away from the breaking point. It's not too late to focus the attention of Congress on America's First Freedom. It's not too late to stop the abuse of the word "marriage." It's not too late to keep cutting taxes and fighting the war on terror.

Keep your powder dry, but vote Republican. And lobby any polititican who will listen. We have to save the Republic democratically before we end up having to fend off a bunch of anti-semitic nutcases on the right, as well as black flag waving anarchists and communists on the left.

These days, they're speaking the same language.

24 posted on 03/15/2004 7:56:56 AM PST by risk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama
Didn't Houston want the defenders to abandon the Alamo because he knew it wasn't really worth defending, but they stayed anyway?
25 posted on 03/15/2004 8:07:50 AM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tkathy
Western Civilization is in the cattle cars on the way to the ovens, while the liberals and the democrats are making loud music to drown out the screams.

Yep. And some of those on board are still asleep.

26 posted on 03/15/2004 8:11:47 AM PST by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie
Right.  Houston knew that you have to choose your battles.  He needed those guys but they ran off half cocked.

The cities of Houston and Austin have a lot in common with their namesakes.  Austin was built in the interior to push the Indians back, and to this day considers itself morally superior.  Austin (like Washington DC) considers itself to be the most important city-- the leader of the land.  Houston actually gets the work done.  It pays the bills, and is so powerful it supplies energy to the world (literally).  Yet Houston is the butt of jokes, is disparaged, while Austin is respected.

Go figure.

27 posted on 03/15/2004 8:37:31 AM PST by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: aardvark1
bump
28 posted on 03/15/2004 9:09:01 AM PST by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama
I wouldn't be touting Houston's praises too loudly. Need I remind you of Sheila Jackson-Lee?
29 posted on 03/15/2004 1:07:57 PM PST by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Agnes Heep
Which is the primary reason why I don't get my history from Hollywood ... or anything similar.

As if the history channel is the authoritative source.

30 posted on 03/15/2004 1:48:29 PM PST by aardvark1 (Nothing is more terrible than ignorance in action.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: aardvark1
...why were so many of the Alamo's defenders themselves native-born Mexicans?

Well, at least eight out of 180 or so. (Maybe nine.)

31 posted on 03/15/2004 1:58:26 PM PST by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tkathy
Powerfully said stuff. Did you think that up?
32 posted on 03/15/2004 2:04:01 PM PST by daniel boob (texas secede)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: aardvark1
As if the history channel is the authoritative source.

You don't need to feel ashamed if you like the history channel. It's better than nothing, and you don't have to read (ick!).

33 posted on 03/15/2004 2:45:06 PM PST by Agnes Heep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama
I think the writer was expressing a desire to see the "spirit" and "conviction" and "determination" of Nathan Hale. You seem to condemn Nathan Hale because he failed in his mission. If that's the case, then you might just as well condemn everyone who fights with and for a heart-felt purpose, but loses the fight.
34 posted on 03/16/2004 5:05:56 AM PST by ought-six
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: aardvark1
Bush to Fox: "Mi Alamo es su Alamo."
35 posted on 03/16/2004 5:09:27 AM PST by guitfiddlist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: expat_panama
"Everyone wants to remember the Alamo but I prefer to remember San Jacinto."

Not so long ago San Jacinto day was a big deal but no more and I also include Golaid and visit the small monument there any time I'm in the area.

But to me the story of the Alamo (and #$%^ the revisionist stories) where a group was greatly outnumbered, knew they were going to die, had a mission and didn't cut and run even though they had multiple opportunities to do so gets to me. I know that there are newly raised questions if Houston really ordered them to hold up Santa Ana but to the story it's moot, they didn't cut and run, knowing their fate.

I can't think of that without getting misty.

Perhaps it's because as a kid the Texas revolution was pounded into our heads starting in grade school. Too bad that's no longer the case.

And the Alamo remains a powerful symbol. Bless the Daughters of the Republic of Texas, a volunteer group that has managed the Alamo since 1905. I "enjoy" watching kids trying to enter without removing their hats. Those ladies make sure they understand.

36 posted on 03/16/2004 5:24:47 AM PST by Proud_texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Proud_texan
Every year I try to sneak in a bit of the Battle of San Jacinto when I'm volunteering at school. Grandpa Sion Bostick was there and his first account story is most interesting. You'd be surprised (or not) how little the textbooks ignore or spin. My biggest soapbox on the textbooks is that William Goyens was a runaway slave and amazingly the Daughters of the Texas Revolution is still perpetuating that myth.
37 posted on 03/16/2004 5:35:40 AM PST by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn
When I was a kid we got San Jacinto day off from school....

William Goyens is an incredibly interesting man (as I'm sure you know better than I), very successful at many things but, at least as far as I can tell, the issue of him being a runaway slave is still open to question with one story of Goyens buying his freedom, when his "owner" showed up in Nacogdoches, by paying him (the owner) $5,000.

The most credible story to me is that he was born free but during a trip to La. an attempt was made to sell him into slavery and instead he signed a note. He returned to Nacogdoches and when the holder of the note attempted to collect he (Goyens) contested it in court and won.

Perhaps part of the problem is that he was involved in a lot of things, even acting as a Cherokee interpreter for Houston and there are so many stories about him, I'm sure some of which, hum, skirt on the edge of dubious facts.

Kudos to you for keeping the flame burning! I feel sorry for kids these days that don't have the benefit of a very rich story.

38 posted on 03/16/2004 5:53:15 AM PST by Proud_texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: risk
I wished I still shared your optimism, but I don't. This president and this Congress have squandered so many opportunities trying to get the 'Rats and Commies to like them, at the expense of those of us who put them there. The New Tone? What a crock...leadership is what we needed after 2000, not the New Tone. Well, in the words of Roberto Duran, no mas (we'd all better brush up on the Spanish, at the rate the invasion across the southern border is going). I've held my nose for the last time, though I am voting for a Pubbie this year...his name is Tom Tancredo.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

39 posted on 03/16/2004 6:05:16 AM PST by wku man (Breathe, Relax, Aim, Squeeze...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: risk
Incidently, there's a helluva lot more to the right wing than "anti-semetic nutcases". I'd appreciate it if you'd use a much smaller brush next time.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

40 posted on 03/16/2004 6:09:35 AM PST by wku man (Breathe, Relax, Aim, Squeeze...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson