Posted on 03/15/2004 3:04:00 PM PST by Wolfie
Would you also say that "the special economic circumstances of White Willow bark -- namely, its unpatentability and consequent inability to repay the costs of getting FDA approval -- need to be taken into account"?
What a jerk.
"Although marijuana smoke delivers THC and other cannabinoids to the body, it also delivers harmful substances, including most of those found in tobacco smoke. In addition, plants contain a variable mixture of biologically active compounds and cannot be expected to provide a precisely defined drug effect. For those reasons there is little future in smoked marijuana as a medically approved medication. If there is any future in cannabinoid drugs, it lies with agents of more certain, not less certain, composition."
And those "agents" can be found in drugs like Marinol® and Sativex®.
Gosh! I didn't know you were gonna use the same science that proves global warming.
Well, that settles that, alright.
"The profile of cannabinoid drug effects suggests that they are promising for treating wasting syndrome in AIDS patients. Nausea, appetite loss, pain, and anxiety are all afflictions of wasting, and all can be mitigated by marijuana. Although some medications are more effective than marijuana for these problems, they are not equally effective in all patients. A rapid-onset (that is, acting within minutes) delivery system should be developed and tested in such patients. Smoking marijuana is not recommended. The long-term harm caused by smoking marijuana makes it a poor drug delivery system, particularly for patients with chronic illnesses."
There. That's better.
Sick people have been suffering for centuries. So? Like you care?
Your goal is marijuana legalization. Your concern for the sick and dying is limited to their use to you in getting to that goal.
Disgusting.
Cannabis has been used as herbal medicine before in many countries. Why do you think it has no medicinal properties? Many of the drugs we use now began as an herbal extract.
Well, since you think you won the argument, then there's no need for you to hang around this thread.
See ya. Don't let the door hit you on the way out. Adios. Auf wiedersehen. Tell Soros I said, "#$%^ you".
Like you do care? Your concern for the sick and dying is roughly equal to that of what you accuse others of. It's just strategic talking point to you. You want to keep pot and other abstractly chosen substances under the control of the government or as you might say "society".
Without bringing sick and dying people into it, and ignoring medical pot initiatives, this is a simple constitutional freedom issue.
Please see #9.
I suppose you agree with the guy that posted the supporting information that smoked marijuana cures tetanus and uterine hemmorrhaging.
The door is wide open now for other States to press ahead with medical MJ programs. Efforts are now underway in Texas, for example.
The toothpaste is getting out of the tube while they dawdle.
Is it possible cannabis is both medicinally useful and gets people high? What makes you think that these two properties are mutually exclusive?
My friend, if you're going to be against something, you must have a reason. When a person is for or against something just because they are is indicative of someone who has bought a bill of goods without checking the warehouse.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.