Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Condi Smacks Clarke on Fox'N Friends
Fox News Channel

Posted on 03/22/2004 4:12:01 AM PST by ReleaseTheHounds

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-175 next last
To: BibChr
BibChr is rational. All others are irrational.
rinse.
repeat.
101 posted on 03/22/2004 7:59:26 AM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Principled
Now you're just being silly. Odd screen name, given your line of argument.

So here's one more post. Want no more responses? Stop the irrational attacks. Or, if you can, answer the question.

Dan
102 posted on 03/22/2004 8:02:09 AM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
Of course, it is. There was no other reason for you to try and change the subject.
103 posted on 03/22/2004 8:12:48 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican
I put on a blindfold.
104 posted on 03/22/2004 8:13:27 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Principled
Apparently you haven't comprehended my remarks.
105 posted on 03/22/2004 8:14:28 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: ReleaseTheHounds
... he had been Counter-Terrorism Czar for a number of years in the Clinton Administration ...

Just another bitter, phased-out Clintonista.

106 posted on 03/22/2004 8:15:25 AM PST by VadeRetro (Some things you only have to screw up once.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Change what subject? Have you lost the thread of the dialogue you started?

Rice for President 2008, said one poster.

What's her position on killing children for being inconvenient or imperfect?, I asked. (Nobody's answered yet, btw; just a lot of gassing about this and that irrelevancy.)

Then you came in on the attack, and I've responded.

Who changed the subject? Is her candidacy for President not the subject?

Then you're complaining to the wrong poster.

But I already pointed that out, didn't I? Have you gotten back to the person who brought up the topic, yet?

Dan
107 posted on 03/22/2004 8:18:25 AM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: sultan88; ForGod'sSake
"Condi on the counter-attack. I love it. Looks like our side is getting its first response team in place quickly!"

As well they should; but, the story isn't over, either.

I DEMAND to know exactly *why* SeeBS permitted their Stahl-stooge to run with such a damningly inaccurate story BEFORE it was thoroughly checked out for accuracy.

I mean why there are people who watched the smear -- complete with the obligatory torential downpour of LIES supposedly presented as undisputable "smoking gun" evidence buttressing their FALSE claims -- who might've gotten the wrong idea, eh? < /sarc>

I'm simply fedup & sick to death of this kind of buillshit "journalism" being spewed -- HOURLY!! -- from America's pack of wild eyed Liberal-Socialist MORONS who're inundating & infesting OUR United States government OWNED FCC licensed airwaves!!

...enough is enough.

108 posted on 03/22/2004 8:21:38 AM PST by Landru (Indulgences: 2 for a buck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
Your attack on Rice was a change of subject from the foreign policy content of this thread. There is no other way to view it. I respond to whom I wish not to whom YOU think I should.
109 posted on 03/22/2004 8:23:06 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Clarke claims that Condi Rice didn't even know who Al Qaeda was. I'm nearly falling on the floor laughing. The entire world knew UBL was a threat when he was interviewed in a world exclusive interview, by CNN's Nic Robertson in August of 1998, televised in it's entirety to the world via CNN and CNN International and when he famously repeated his jihad against America.

This has me laughing also. We have a cat that we got as a kitten probably six years ago. He went through several names because we just couldn't find one that fit his personality. As a kitten, he was just a crazy, psycho, and totally terrorized our other adult cat, and wouldn't leave her alone. Finally we started referring to him as "the terrorist" and that eventually involved to us calling him Bin Laden, or Bin for short. Well, obviously, after 9/11 we immediately had to change his name again, as we didn't want to be calling for Bin Laden throughout the neighborhood when he snuck out the door. What I'm getting to, is that before 9/11 even we knew who Bin Laden was, and we weren't the political junkies that we are now!

110 posted on 03/22/2004 8:27:23 AM PST by Bush_Democrat (Now EX-democrat!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Bush_Democrat
That's a GREAT story.

My sister is a stay at home mom of 3 and does not pay much attention to the news and NEVER has the television or radio on.

I called her on 9/11 because I knew she wouldn't know what was happening otherwise. She hadn't heard what was happening (I called around 9:30 that morning) and she immediately said it's Osama Bin Laden. I was stunned.

Everyone I called that day knew it was OBL. The air conditioning guy (who was no rocket scientist let me tell you!) who was working on our A/C that day knew it was OBL.

I doubt Clarke will repeat that particular comment as it's so provably false and ridiculous that he probably already regrets making it.

A judge will tell a jury that if a person has been found to lie about ANY part of their testimony, they may discard the evidence presented by that person altogether.

I think Clark has just told such a provable lie that we are able to discard his testimony and book alltogether.
111 posted on 03/22/2004 8:31:03 AM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
It really is starting to look as if you aren't reading before responding.

Prove me wrong. What did I answer the first time you called what I wrote "attacking"?

Dan
112 posted on 03/22/2004 8:31:47 AM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: ReleaseTheHounds
I continue to be amazed how the media goes to former Clinton administration officials to slam Bush on this war on terrorism. The Clinton Administration, a group who once had OBL offered to them during his presidency, yet he was allowed to be let go.
113 posted on 03/22/2004 8:40:45 AM PST by ChevyZ28 (We can make the plans of our heart, but the final out come is in God's hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReleaseTheHounds
With due respect to Cheney . . .


CONDI FOR VP

THEN FOR PRESIDENT!!!
114 posted on 03/22/2004 8:49:06 AM PST by Quix (Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
The Wall Street Journal has an excellent editorial today, about how the 9/11 commission is nothing but a Democrat partisan witch hunt, nothing more than a campaign stunt. I think that it is time to revisit those leaked memos regarding the use of the commission for partisan purposes.
115 posted on 03/22/2004 8:51:24 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
If you want to talk about Condi's alledged position on abortion start another thread. This one is not concerned with that issue. Trying to highjack it into becoming one is not what anyone but you wants.
116 posted on 03/22/2004 8:52:47 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: BibChr

Please stop.

This is a thread about Richard Clarke's charges agianst Condi Rice and the Bush Administration concerning the buildup to 9-11. You want to talk about abortion. This isn't the thread for that.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

117 posted on 03/22/2004 8:58:07 AM PST by section9 (Major Motoko Kusanagi says, "John Kerry: all John F., no Kennedy..." Click on my pic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Have you written the person who brought up the thought of Rice for President yet?

I wonder why you want to keep this going, when you can't just answer simple questions. I'm not enjoying this. What are you getting out of it?

Dan
118 posted on 03/22/2004 9:01:49 AM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: section9
You wrote the wrong person. Go back and follow the thread. If you haven't the time, just go on to something else.

I'll stop responding when I've nothing to respond to.

Dan
119 posted on 03/22/2004 9:03:00 AM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: ReleaseTheHounds
LOL. It's not lookin' good for their side, folks. Just heard an ABC Radio news story at the top of the hour on this and it was fair and balanced! Gasp! It even gave a decent sound bite to Dr. Rice's refutation of Clarke's BS. Oh, my.
120 posted on 03/22/2004 9:03:54 AM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
I just heard that! They said the White House calls it "Dick Clark's American Grandstand"!!!!!
121 posted on 03/22/2004 9:04:45 AM PST by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
Who's paying Clarke? Viacom apparently. In more ways than one. Free Press, Simon & Shyster, CBS's 60 Minutes. But then Viacom's run by an FOB, isn't it?
122 posted on 03/22/2004 9:05:26 AM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
Forget it, assclown. I asked you politely and you came back with some snarky "go follow the thread" remark.

People who hijack threads are assclowns. It follows from that axiom that you are an assclown, deserving of contempt and slight regard:

In anticipation of your redundant response, I condemn you to The Ultimate Flame:

You swine. You vulgar little maggot. Don't you know that you are pathetic? You worthless bag of filth. As we say in Texas, I'll bet you couldn't pour piss out of a boot with instructions on the heel. You are a canker. A sore that won't go away. I would rather kiss a lawyer than be seen with you.

You are a fiend and a coward, and you have bad breath. You are degenerate, noxious and depraved. I feel debased just for knowing you exist. I despise everything about you. You are a bloody nardless newbie twit protohominid chromosomally aberrant caricature of a coprophagic cloacal parasitic pond scum and I wish you would go away.

You're a putrescence mass, a walking vomit. You are a spineless little worm deserving nothing but the profoundest contempt. You are a jerk, a cad, a weasel. Your life is a monument to stupidity. You are a stench, a revulsion, a big suck on a sour lemon. You are a bleating fool, a curdled staggering mutant dwarf smeared richly with the effluvia and offal accompanying your alleged birth into this world. An insensate, blinking calf, meaningful to nobody, abandoned by the puke-drooling, giggling beasts who sired you and then killed themselves in recognition of what they had done.

I will never get over the embarrassment of belonging to the same species as you. You are a monster, an ogre, a malformity. I barf at the very thought of you. You have all the appeal of a paper cut. Lepers avoid you. You are vile, worthless, less than nothing. You are a weed, a fungus, the dregs of this earth. And did I mention you smell?

If you aren't an idiot, you made a world-class effort at simulating one. Try to edit your writing of unnecessary material before attempting to impress us with your insight. The evidence that you are a nincompoop will still be available to readers, but they will be able to access it more rapidly.

You snail-skulled little rabbit. Would that a hawk pick you up, drive its beak into your brain, and upon finding it rancid set you loose to fly briefly before spattering the ocean rocks with the frothy pink shame of your ignoble blood. May you choke on the queasy, convulsing nausea of your own trite, foolish beliefs.

You are weary, stale, flat and unprofitable. You are grimy, squalid, nasty and profane. You are foul and disgusting. You're a fool, an ignoramus. Monkeys look down on you. Even sheep won't have sex with you. You are unreservedly pathetic, starved for attention, and lost in a land that reality forgot.

And what meaning do you expect your delusionally self-important statements of unknowing, inexperienced opinion to have with us? What fantasy do you hold that you would believe that your tiny-fisted tantrums would have more weight than that of a leprous desert rat, spinning rabidly in a circle, waiting for the bite of the snake? You are a waste of flesh. You have no rhythm. You are ridiculous and obnoxious. You are the moral equivalent of a leech. You are a living emptiness, a meaningless void. You are sour and senile. You are a disease, you puerile one-handed slack-jawed drooling meatslapper.

On a good day you're a half-wit. You remind me of drool. You are deficient in all that lends character. You have the personality of wallpaper. You are dank and filthy. You are asinine and benighted. You are the source of all unpleasantness. You spread misery and sorrow wherever you go.

I cannot believe how incredibly stupid you are. I mean rock-hard stupid. Dehydrated-rock-hard stupid. Stupid so stupid that it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole different dimension of stupid. You are trans-stupid stupid. Meta-stupid. Stupid collapsed on itself so far that even the neutrons have collapsed. Stupid gotten so dense that no intellect can escape. Singularity stupid. Blazing hot mid-day sun on Mercury stupid. You emit more stupid in one second than our entire galaxy emits in a year. Quasar stupid. Your writing has to be a troll. Nothing in our universe can really be this stupid. Perhaps this is some primordial fragment from the original big bang of stupid. Some pure essence of a stupid so uncontaminated by anything else as to be beyond the laws of physics that we know. I'm sorry. I can't go on. This is an epiphany of stupid for me. After this, you may not hear from me again for a while. I don't have enough strength left to deride your ignorant questions and half baked comments about unimportant trivia, or any of the rest of this drivel. Duh.

The only thing worse than your logic is your manners. I have snipped away most of what you wrote, because, well... it didn't really say anything. Your attempt at constructing a creative flame was pitiful. I mean, really, stringing together a bunch of insults among a load of babbling was hardly effective... Maybe later in life, after you have learned to read, write, spell, and count, you will have more success. True, these are rudimentary skills that many of us "normal" people take for granted that everyone has an easy time of mastering. But we sometimes forget that there are "challenged" persons in this world who find these things more difficult. If I had known, that this was your case then I would have never read your post. It just wouldn't have been "right". Sort of like parking in a handicap space. I wish you the best of luck in the emotional, and social struggles that seem to be placing such a demand on you.

Other than that, have a nice day.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

123 posted on 03/22/2004 9:12:46 AM PST by section9 (Major Motoko Kusanagi says, "John Kerry: all John F., no Kennedy..." Click on my pic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
And what is your position on President Hitlary Clinton???


Give me President Rice or give me death under Hitlary!!!!
124 posted on 03/22/2004 9:15:23 AM PST by Gracey (NOT Fonda Kerry and his 9.10 Democrat Party mentality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: section9
Yeah, that's a really mature, contentful contribution. I won't respond in kind. That can be all yours.

I asked one appropriate question — still not answered! After that, every single posting of mine has been a response to a gripe or a snipe.

If they stopped, I could stop responding.

Dan
125 posted on 03/22/2004 9:18:22 AM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Principled
LOL. I thought there was a problem w/my thought processes. Geez, we're fighting for the survival of our country, the leftist media, the leftist/commies who wish to take over our country... and "johnny one note" has to chime in. I guess the BibChr would LOVE to have Heil Hitlary as his next President.
126 posted on 03/22/2004 9:19:02 AM PST by Gracey (NOT Fonda Kerry and his 9.10 Democrat Party mentality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
Look, I know that you are operating under the delusion that people actually care what you think, but let me disabuse you of this notion:

You do not have a "right" to have your questions answered, nor is anyone else here on this threat (which happens to be about Condi and Clarke, not abortion) under any obligation to answer your questions.

Now do run along.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

127 posted on 03/22/2004 9:26:18 AM PST by section9 (Major Motoko Kusanagi says, "John Kerry: all John F., no Kennedy..." Click on my pic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
Since I made the comment, and as the thread poster pointed out, my comment had to do with the continuation of our country under someone who will be HARD AS NAILS against the Islamofacists, against the Leftists in OUR country, against the Clintonistas. I can't think of anyone tougher than Condi. The last thought on my mind is your perpetual subject.

I care about the viability of this country, this country that will be a WAR with Islamofacists for many years to come. Our choice is Hitlary or someone tough TOUGH defender of our country, a TOUGH woman who has no qualms about going to war against our enemies. That's my focal point. That's the subject of this thread and nothing more. Geez. You're really a very decent guy... one of my favorites but let's put issues in their proper perspective.

Adopt a child if that's your preference. I have
128 posted on 03/22/2004 9:26:38 AM PST by Gracey (NOT Fonda Kerry and his 9.10 Democrat Party mentality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Gracey
Oh, I LOATHE the thought! What Hell would America have come to if it would elect as abominable a wretch of a woman as Hillary Clinton?!

When you cheered Condi for President, I just asked if you know Rice's position on killing children for being inconvenient or imperfect. We know Hillary's; it's about as bad as can be. What's Rice's position, do you know? I'd hoped you might. I'd love it to be a sound position, because from what else I know, I'd be happy to support her. But what I've seen is troubling.

It isn't a happy thing to have so much trouble getting rational responses to a reasonable question.

Dan
129 posted on 03/22/2004 9:30:49 AM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
I write whom I wish to not whom you wish I would write.
130 posted on 03/22/2004 9:31:03 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: section9
Of course I have every much as right to post as you do, of course — and I don't bloat every one of my postings with gratuitous graphics.

If all of my posts on this thread that aren't responses to snipes or gripes were pulled, that would leave about two.

You don't want to hear from me? Stop sniping or griping at me. Can you do that?

Dan
131 posted on 03/22/2004 9:32:38 AM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: section9
Say, Section9. May I hijack that GREAT pic of my dear Condi from your home page. That is AWESOME!!!! I've never met a woman that can take on Hitlary and shred her to bits, disect her and spit her out... all while remaining articulate, dignified and cool. She's almost as cool as VP Cheney.

We're so fortunate to have her in our camp, during these war years.
132 posted on 03/22/2004 9:32:51 AM PST by Gracey (NOT Fonda Kerry and his 9.10 Democrat Party mentality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Fine, whatever. NO need to be single-digit about it. But does it make sense to keep sniping and griping, then complain if your target has the nerve to respond?

Not to me.

Dan
133 posted on 03/22/2004 9:37:39 AM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
My comments have been direct and pointed no "sniping" involved. The only "gripe" was about your attempt to drag abortion into a foreign policy discussion and the attempt to make Condi some sort of abortionist.

Condi as president is a legitimate derivation from her foreign policy expertise which was the subject of the thread.
134 posted on 03/22/2004 9:41:57 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
Regarding your johnny one note question, I really don't give a darn, dim, dam, duh. My concern is the continuation and VIABILITY of our country. We don't have the luxury to be concerned about anything but the safety and security and VIABILITY of our country these days, for IF we don't have that much, you can kiss everything else "ADIOS."

Otherwise, bless you dear man.

135 posted on 03/22/2004 9:41:58 AM PST by Gracey (NOT Fonda Kerry and his 9.10 Democrat Party mentality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
My post #128
136 posted on 03/22/2004 9:43:22 AM PST by Gracey (NOT Fonda Kerry and his 9.10 Democrat Party mentality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Yeah, she's very impressive. I'd like to be able to support her.

Since you now think that a possible Presidential candidacy is a legitimate topic, do you know what her position is on killing children for being inconvenient or imperfect?

Dan
137 posted on 03/22/2004 9:45:17 AM PST by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
Oh, I LOATHE the thought! What Hell would America have come to if it would elect as abominable a wretch of a woman as Hillary Clinton?!


Whew!!1 Now that's a good start. I'm glad you don't wish to say Heil Hitlary!!!

However, women in the middle just LOVE to vote for women, even if they don't know a damn about politics.
138 posted on 03/22/2004 9:46:44 AM PST by Gracey (NOT Fonda Kerry and his 9.10 Democrat Party mentality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
My issue with your question is that the premise is incorrect.

You have GROSSLY overexaggerated, and I refuse to reply to your categorization of a absolutely wonderful lady, who CARES about our citizens, CARES about our country and is working perhaps 80+ hours a week fighting to keep us ALIVE. Now what's that worth to you?

She's very pro LIFE for ALL American citizens. Her job as National SECURITY Advisor is just that... a position to keep our American citizens ALIVE. That's about as pro LIFE as one can get.



139 posted on 03/22/2004 9:53:29 AM PST by Gracey (NOT Fonda Kerry and his 9.10 Democrat Party mentality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: BibChr; Gracey
This is not an abortion thread.

You want to talk about your beliefs about Condi's abortion views start another thread. As Gracey so rightly points out there is only one issue of real concern now and that is national survival which will be possible only when the Murdering Minions of Mad Mo are confronted and defeated.

Anyone who gets in the way of that even inadvertently will hear from me.
140 posted on 03/22/2004 9:53:54 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
On that vexing topic of abortion, Rice has reportedly described herself as 'mildly pro-choice' on one occasion and 'reluctantly pro-choice' on another.

Here you go. Good luck figuring out what it means!

141 posted on 03/22/2004 9:58:35 AM PST by SandyInSeattle (You need tons click "co-ordinating")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Gracey; BibChr; justshutupandtakeit
I've got no dog in this fight, but I must admit it's been rather humorous to see the attacks carried out against someone who just asked a question.

If you don't know the answer, then "I don't know" would suffice. If you do know the answer, then "yes" or "no" would suffice.

As it is, close to one third of this thread has been dedicated to attacking a man who asked a question which was in response to something another poster made a comment about.

If the question does not belong on the thread then the comment that started it didn't belong either.

Perhaps you guys are assuming that the answer to the question would not be a positive thing. To be honest I don't know and now I'm curious. What is the position Condi takes?
142 posted on 03/22/2004 9:58:38 AM PST by Texas2step (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
You don't like my graphic? Too effin' bad. Life ain't a bowl of cherries.

Now then, to your bleat:

Of course I have every much as right to post as you do, of course — and I don't bloat every one of my postings with gratuitous graphics.

Look, I know it's hard going through life being an oxygen thief, but you really ought not to set up a straw man. NO ONE is arguing that you don't have a right to post. That was a disingenous little dodge. What I'm saying is that you don't have a right to have your questions answered, especially since you've decided to bring your Johnnie One Note self to a foreign policy thread.

No one owes you an answer to anything. Stop acting as if we do.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

143 posted on 03/22/2004 9:59:58 AM PST by section9 (Major Motoko Kusanagi says, "John Kerry: all John F., no Kennedy..." Click on my pic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Texas2step
Apparently you have not seen a real attack.

Neither I nor BC knows Condi's position though he thinks he might and is willing to attack her based upon that rumor/supposition.

As stated earlier the proposition that Condi become president was based upon her foreign policy expertise and thus, a legitimate thing to say on a foreign policy/national security/war against terrorism thread.

Where did your confusion start?
144 posted on 03/22/2004 10:03:16 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: section9
No one owes you an answer to anything. Stop acting as if we do.

You are right about that, Chris. However, to characterize BibChr's comment as an attack on Condi is: 1) disingenious, 2) paraniod, 3) a sign that his simple question struck some chords.

Every single one of BibChr's comments have been in response to attacks misrepresenting his question.

Some folks don't get it. They don't like the thread being "hijacked" yet they are the ones that are continuing the "hijack" the thread in an effort to obtain the last word.
145 posted on 03/22/2004 10:04:16 AM PST by Texas2step (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: ReleaseTheHounds
I have nothing against Dick Cheney but I wouldn't mind seeing Condi as our next VP.
146 posted on 03/22/2004 10:05:13 AM PST by aodell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
"What is her position on killing children for being inconvenient or imperfect? "

This is your uncalled for statement. You didn't ask a question, instead JUST LIKE a DEMOCRAT, you make a snide insinuation against a woman who's been saving your butt. I RESENT your insinuation against this wonderful woman. You're no better than Democrats.

I haven't heard ONE not ONE kind word about this woman out of your mouth, and that's what this thread was all about... it's about PRAISING Condi.

I agree, start your own thread. This is an UPBEAT "WE LOVE CONDI" thread for KEEPING YOUR ASS and MINE ALIVE.

GO CONDI!!!! We love ya babe!!!!
147 posted on 03/22/2004 10:10:22 AM PST by Gracey (NOT Fonda Kerry and his 9.10 Democrat Party mentality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Apparently you have not seen a real attack.

Actually, I've seen more than my fair share, and launched a few as well. :-) I'm thinking maybe you don't know what constitutes an attack as you have characterized BibChr's original comment as an attack against Condi when all he did was ask a question.

Neither I nor BC knows Condi's position though he thinks he might and is willing to attack her based upon that rumor/supposition.

BC as much as admitted he didn't know Condi's position when he asked the question. You, and others, could have simply answered "I don't know" and you would have been done with it. You didn't. You are the one that went on the attack first, and he has responded in kind.

As stated earlier the proposition that Condi become president was based upon her foreign policy expertise and thus, a legitimate thing to say on a foreign policy/national security/war against terrorism thread.

And, as a possible presidential candidate, a legitimate question was asked in response to that statement. A simple "I don't know" would have sufficed for an answer, but you chose to become your own worse enemy and get the topic off of Condi's foreign relations experience into areas that evidently know one knows about. Again, I have no dog in this fight, I just found it ironic that you were the one that prolonged this "hijacking".

Where did your confusion start?

When you characterized BC's question as an attack and then claimed that your attacks on BC for even asking the question were not attacks. Pretty weak to call BC's question an attack, particularly if you are characterizing your own statements as being non-confrontational, when they are much closer to an attack than the original question.

Better now?
148 posted on 03/22/2004 10:12:20 AM PST by Texas2step (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Texas2step
You think I haven't dealt with this clown before? He pops up on Condi threads now and again, always describing her as being this side of Reynhard Heydrich in regards to abortion.

Really, this was a foreign policy thread. I resent some asshat coming on here and claiming the thread as his own so he can turn it into an abortion thread.

BibChr is a provacateur, pure and simple. He's not some innocent soul who has no idea what Condi's position on abortion is. If you believe that, than you've got a lot of work to you.

If he wants to paint Rice as a babykiller, which is what he is trying to do, I don't have to allow him to have a free ride.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

149 posted on 03/22/2004 10:16:49 AM PST by section9 (Major Motoko Kusanagi says, "John Kerry: all John F., no Kennedy..." Click on my pic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Gracey
you make a snide insinuation

A snide insinuation?

What is her position on killing children for being inconvenient or imperfect?

Nope, a legitimate question. Do you have an answer? Then say so, either way.

Look folks, if we are going to characterize questions such as this as an attack and get all irate about questions such as this even being asked, then we're the ones acting like the democraps.

It's a democropic ploy to attack the questions instead of answering them. You cannot tell me it's not. We're (conservatives) better than that.
150 posted on 03/22/2004 10:17:32 AM PST by Texas2step (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson