Skip to comments.
Mansoor Ijaz slamming Richard Clarke on Fox'N Friends
Fox News Channel
Posted on 03/22/2004 4:28:39 AM PST by ReleaseTheHounds
Mansoor Ijaz just called Richard Clarke essentially a liar. Challenged virtually all of his claims -- and accused Clarke of stonewalling Ijaz's efforts to capture Bin Laden via the Sudanese.
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 60minutes; bias; ccrm; foxnews; ijaz; media; richardclarke; stophillary; sudan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 101-150, 151-200, 201-250, 251-254 next last
To: sarasota
Cheney and Rice=top two attack dogs!
Republican Rotweilers!
151
posted on
03/22/2004 6:45:35 AM PST
by
DonnerT
(Any compromise with evil is capitulation.!)
To: ReleaseTheHounds
bump
152
posted on
03/22/2004 6:50:56 AM PST
by
jonno
(We are NOT a democracy - though we are democratic. We ARE a constitutional republic.)
To: Impeach the Boy
Bump.
153
posted on
03/22/2004 6:54:12 AM PST
by
First_Salute
(May God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)
To: ReleaseTheHounds
The media lib WHORES got what they wanted from Clarke! Ijaz will never see his version on the national tube! GOSH I HATE THOSE CLYMERS! Anyway, nothing to see here, move along the whores have their ammo and will use it to the hilt!! What W needs to do is IMMEDIATELY go on the offensive against Clarke...not tomorrow, but NOW!! Notice how ketchup boy immediately, like in the next day or the next hour, countattacks W's camp accusations! THAT'S THE WAY TO DO IT!!
To: commish
**grin**
We don't want you to have to stop the car...
155
posted on
03/22/2004 6:57:40 AM PST
by
an amused spectator
(John Kerry: Future Leader Of The Traffic Citation On Terror)
To: mewzilla
And when 43 came in, Clarke was demoted from his cabinet-level position. Gee, wonder why the lamestream never mentions that little fact. I pulled out my old copy of Bob Woodward's book, Bush at War which accounted the months after 9-11 and Clarke's name is not mentioned once in the book. (At least not listed in the index).
I'm not sure what that means, but since Woodward claims he had unfettered access to anyone he wanted to talk to, it appears that Clarke was not near the top of anyone's VIP list.
156
posted on
03/22/2004 6:58:52 AM PST
by
Ditto
( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
To: Peach
157
posted on
03/22/2004 7:08:45 AM PST
by
Peach
To: There's millions of'em
Everyone, call your elected RATS offices, particularly in DC, and tell them, "nice try, Clarke struck out, next batter up, if you like -- particularly as we await the list of foreign leaders supporting your presumptive nominee."
158
posted on
03/22/2004 7:08:55 AM PST
by
mwl1
To: ReleaseTheHounds
At least Imus this morning was slamming Clarke as an opportunist shilling a book.
159
posted on
03/22/2004 7:08:57 AM PST
by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
To: NewLand
I hope Ijaz is going before the commission too.
160
posted on
03/22/2004 7:12:36 AM PST
by
b4its2late
(The makeup they use on Katie tomorrow will be a total waste of money.)
To: Peach
Clarke offered a chillingly prescient quote from one aide who agreed with him about Clinton administration inaction. "What's it going to take to get them to hit al Qaeda in Afghanistan? Does al Qaeda have to attack the Pentagon?" said the dismayed Clintonista...
Wow...how many pieces of silver have the clintonoids promised this traitor to cover up THEIR failures?
161
posted on
03/22/2004 7:13:30 AM PST
by
MamaLucci
(Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
To: an amused spectator
Simon & Schuster is owned by Viacom which also owns CBS and 60 Minutes. Circle jerk promotion that happens to fit in with the Viacom execs partisan prejudices.
162
posted on
03/22/2004 7:13:47 AM PST
by
Ditto
( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
To: All
163
posted on
03/22/2004 7:15:15 AM PST
by
Kieri
(Who's waiting for the return of her beloved Farscape!)
To: mtbopfuyn
What is the Peter principle? I bet my Peter is bigger than your Peter?
To: ReleaseTheHounds
Classic quote fo the AM. Don Imus said Clarke's publisher Simon & Schuster were...damn I can't remember the word...'terrorists'? possibly for allowint Clarke to publish this book.
165
posted on
03/22/2004 7:17:50 AM PST
by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
To: captbarney
Is John Podhoretz any relation to Norman Podhoretz?
CA....
166
posted on
03/22/2004 7:17:53 AM PST
by
Chances Are
(Whew! It seems I've once again found that silly grin!)
To: twigs
You mean to tell me any regular Joe can call the CIA, and get insider information like this dude.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
"He's always very excited about one thing or another, but it rarely seems that his breathless predictions come true."
If you recall, he was the one talking about Pakistans' "Father of the Islamic bomb" selling nuclear secrets to other countries MONTHS before anyone else said a word about it.
I think the guy has a lot of credibility.
168
posted on
03/22/2004 7:26:39 AM PST
by
EEDUDE
(Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.)
To: TomGuy
I have searched my local library as well as Amazon.com and can find no book by Richard Minter.
Would you be kind enough to give a title for the book?
Thank you for your help.
169
posted on
03/22/2004 7:27:12 AM PST
by
arjay
To: arjay
170
posted on
03/22/2004 7:30:01 AM PST
by
elli1
To: ReleaseTheHounds
Drudge: The Sunday Times has established that after a fierce internal row about the sincerity of the offer, the White House responded by sending Richard Clarke, Clinton's most senior counterterrorism adviser, to meet the rulers of the United Arab Emirates. They denied there was any such offer. Ijaz, however, maintained that the White House had thereby destroyed the deal, which was to have been arranged only through unofficial channels. Ijaz said that weeks later on a return trip to the Gulf he was taken on a late-night ride into the desert by his contact who told him that Clarke's front-door approach had upset a delicate internal balance and blown the deal. "Your government has missed a major opportunity," he recalls being told.
171
posted on
03/22/2004 7:38:32 AM PST
by
m1-lightning
(God, Guns, and Country!)
To: arjay
172
posted on
03/22/2004 7:41:01 AM PST
by
TomGuy
(Clintonites have such good hindsight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
To: ALOHA RONNIE
Bump!
To: Impeach the Boy
OTOH, perhaps this jackass's presence in the administration isn't fatal to the President, but only to the 'rat Party...Bush is seen by the electorate as a fair, fine leader during wartime. The 'rats (including those he allowed to remain) are falling on their swords trying to wipe him out, but are not being received very well.
At least it is a thought....
174
posted on
03/22/2004 7:43:49 AM PST
by
Recovering_Democrat
(I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
To: ReleaseTheHounds
I liked Dick Clarke when he hosted American Bandstand
(tee hee)
175
posted on
03/22/2004 7:46:23 AM PST
by
BSunday
To: twigs
Now it is getting clear. You can reread your post slowly and get a sense of what is wrong with this picture.
Here is what I get from your post. Mansoor is a Moslem Pakistani-American. He has an "investment" management company that employs the ex-CIA director? What is the CIA chief knows about investment? Why the investment company is called Crescent, a symbol of Islam? Are James Woosley, and Abrahmson (both known for their Neo-cons political views) connected to Islamic investments, or money laundering of funds to Islamic organizations?
That is essentially the reasons that the Saudis funded the Al Qaeda, and Egypt provided Zawahri and his hate ideologies, and Pakistan provided international network, and arm shipments, and the US is unable to get its arms around this monster. Simply because of lots of ex-big shots are on the take from the Saudis. This big banana republic of ours will never get its politics right because its politicians never think of AMERICA FIRST. One time we had a politician, who kept drumming that slogan, and you remember what happened to him? Both parties, and the Washington establishment ran him out of town; he has big ears, and he was short, and he speaks with an accent, he quit the race, and came back again, he worried about his daughter wedding
.
To: Peach
Thank you for working so hard to get the facts out. The Left hopes we will become discouraged and turn away from the struggle. b
177
posted on
03/22/2004 7:52:38 AM PST
by
Barset
To: Chances Are
Is John Podhoretz any relation to Norman Podhoretz?Norman is Johns son. Born of liberal parentage they have seen the light.
178
posted on
03/22/2004 7:53:25 AM PST
by
jwalsh07
(We're bringing it on John but you can't handle the truth!)
To: jwalsh07
My bad. John is Normans son.
179
posted on
03/22/2004 7:54:09 AM PST
by
jwalsh07
(We're bringing it on John but you can't handle the truth!)
To: Recovering_Democrat
I see truth in what you are saying...I hope this pans out the way you are suggesting.
To: Alamo-Girl
Clarke's book, and this media blitz, and the retun of Mad Maddie Halfbright to the media, is all carefully timed before Slick appears before the 9/11 commission..it's a big-time CYA operation..
181
posted on
03/22/2004 7:57:53 AM PST
by
ken5050
To: ReleaseTheHounds
You wanna hear about a hellish situation ? I was at the navy hosptital last night with my son (double ear infection plus strep throat) and the two tv's in the waiting room were tuned to 60 minutes featuring Clarke and AMC showing Thelma and Louise..AAAAAAAAGH!!!
182
posted on
03/22/2004 7:58:58 AM PST
by
BSunday
To: ken5050
Clarke's book, and this media blitz, and the retun of Mad Maddie Halfbright to the media, is all carefully timed before Slick appears before the 9/11 commission..it's a big-time CYA operation..
I hadn't considered that, but I forgot the missile attack when Monica was going to testify, etc. Yeh, it is certainly plausible. I have noticed that Clintonites come out of the woodwork every few months in attempts to rewrite history and revise the Clinton legacy. That is definitely a pattern.
183
posted on
03/22/2004 8:03:05 AM PST
by
TomGuy
(Clintonites have such good hindsight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
To: ALOHA RONNIE; Carl/NewsMax
The 911 Commission isn't taking Mansoor Ijaz's testimony?
I hate to say this...but what if the Clinton Administration set up the Bush Administration from the get-go?
What if...they not only encouraged the 911 terrorist
attack, but also put evidence (and people) in place that would make Bush look bad when he took action?
Both the FBI and the CIA still have Clinton Cronies in
top positions... What if these cronies set up Bush by giving him information that set us up for war, and after
the war, they now "present evidence" against him?
**The Conspiring Clintons**
An evil only Satan could love.
184
posted on
03/22/2004 8:04:09 AM PST
by
Joy Angela
(** Keep Hillary FAR AWAY!!**)
To: elli1
Thanks. I was spelling it "Minter" instead of "Miniter".
185
posted on
03/22/2004 8:04:36 AM PST
by
arjay
To: ken5050
Excellent analysis, ken5050! This is no coincidence...
To: ReleaseTheHounds; All
OH MAN I just hear on FR just now
Did he call Richard Clarke a B****
ALRIGHT cool Rack Mozziz Iziz
187
posted on
03/22/2004 8:05:54 AM PST
by
SevenofNine
("Not everybody , in it, for truth, justice, and the American way,"=Det Lennie Briscoe)
To: ReleaseTheHounds
I saw it. He was mad enough to rip his lung out.
188
posted on
03/22/2004 8:07:22 AM PST
by
bmwcyle
(<a href="http://www.johnkerry.com/" target="_blank">miserable failure)
To: dasboot
Yeah, I'm still waiting on some answers to those kinds of prayers, too.
I'd prefer KEEL HAULING a number of the treasonous idiots under the USS RONALD REAGAN aircraft carrier.
But I'd take exile to a pig farm in Siberia.
189
posted on
03/22/2004 8:08:24 AM PST
by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
To: DonnerT; All
Okay I got question what type of dog Rummy is LOL!
190
posted on
03/22/2004 8:10:33 AM PST
by
SevenofNine
("Not everybody , in it, for truth, justice, and the American way,"=Det Lennie Briscoe)
To: DonnerT; All
Okay I got question what type of dog Rummy is LOL!
191
posted on
03/22/2004 8:10:43 AM PST
by
SevenofNine
("Not everybody , in it, for truth, justice, and the American way,"=Det Lennie Briscoe)
To: JamesA
Is every politician in someones pocket or crooked?No, some are both. </bashing>
192
posted on
03/22/2004 8:16:44 AM PST
by
TankerKC
(Clogged Arteries and Still Smilin'!)
To: OrioleFan
Clinton got rid of everyone, even those beyond the travel office. That seems to be the MO for the Rats. Here in NM in 2003, new Governor Richardson fired (aka "demanded resignation letters from") every non-civil service employee in every department and division, every member of every board and commission (from hairdressers to professional engineers), every judicial oversight board (until the judges stepped in), and every member of the boards of regents at state schools and universities. The excuse given was so that he could shape state government to better govern and serve the public. Even some members of the press felt a little uncomfortable swallowing that excuse. If the Republicans had done that, they would immediately have been assailed as "right-wing, partisan and mean spirited". By contrast, the previous eight years under Governor Johnson could be described as "benign neglect". If things were going good why change them? The republicans have to bite the bullet when taking office -- clean house and kick out the SOBs. Let them bitch to the press at the beginning of the administration not at the start of the re-election campaign four years later.
193
posted on
03/22/2004 8:19:23 AM PST
by
CedarDave
(Spanish socialists = canaries: Yellow; cute to look at, warble mindlessly, useless in a fight)
To: BSunday
Thank your son for his service to our country -- I'm sure I speak for the thousands on Free Republic and tens of millions more in this great land of ours. The way the war on terror is being politicized just sickens me but I can only imagine what it does to you and your family.
To: Chances Are
His son.
To: BSunday
That's o.k. Two of Mel Gibson's movies are/have been on TV this week. They will get more viewing than 60 minutes and left-wing Susan. Also, Rush will be on in a few minutes and will have his hands full with all the news clips from yesterday and this morning.
196
posted on
03/22/2004 8:30:03 AM PST
by
CedarDave
(Spanish socialists = canaries: Yellow; cute to look at, warble mindlessly, useless in a fight)
To: arjay
I have searched my local library as well as Amazon.com and can find no book by Richard Minter. I don't know the title but I believe his name is spelled Miniter.
197
posted on
03/22/2004 8:35:29 AM PST
by
Bob
To: ReleaseTheHounds
Thank your son for his service to our country No, I'm the one in the military - my son is 5. But thanks for the appreciation.
198
posted on
03/22/2004 8:48:39 AM PST
by
BSunday
To: Fresh Wind
He used a racial slur to describe Ijaz.
Might not have been a DUmmy then. We have our own contingent that thinks any and all Muslims are terrorists in disguise.
-Eric
199
posted on
03/22/2004 8:58:56 AM PST
by
E Rocc
("Freedom begins when we tell Mrs. Grundy to go fly a kite" - Robert Heinlein)
To: Ditto
I pulled out my old copy of Bob Woodward's book, Bush at War which accounted the months after 9-11 and Clarke's name is not mentioned once in the book. (At least not listed in the index).
Does anyone have Bill Sammon's book on the same topic? Mine's either out on loan to my brother or misplaced in this disorganized library I live in.
-Eric
200
posted on
03/22/2004 9:05:11 AM PST
by
E Rocc
("Freedom begins when we tell Mrs. Grundy to go fly a kite" - Robert Heinlein)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 101-150, 151-200, 201-250, 251-254 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson