Skip to comments.
SCOTT'S STICKY TAPES
The NY Post ^
| 3/23/04
| Howard BREUER
Posted on 03/23/2004 5:30:59 AM PST by runningbear
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 381-395 next last
latest on the Scott Peterson Trial news......
To: Constitution Day
Scotty on tape!
2
posted on
03/23/2004 5:41:18 AM PST
by
Tijeras_Slim
(Just once I'd like to get by on my looks.)
To: Jackie-O; Devil_Anse; Canadian Outrage; Velveeta; Spunky; Howlin; Diver Dave; RGSpincich; ...
Pinging..... OMG, I lost my ping list at work since they did a change over to windows 2000. I can't find or retrieve it... ping the other please.......
have to re-send an older one from home tomorrow..... ;o(
3
posted on
03/23/2004 5:41:46 AM PST
by
runningbear
(Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
To: runningbear
How inconsiderate of your employer! ;~)
To: runningbear
Rule #1: Don't say nothin' to nobody!
Rule #2: Don't trust nobody, not even your Mother!
If more criminals followed these simple rules, the Police would have a much more difficult job. Fortunately for us all, criminals are stupid.
5
posted on
03/23/2004 5:57:08 AM PST
by
bondjamesbond
(Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
To: runningbear
BUMP
6
posted on
03/23/2004 6:19:19 AM PST
by
GrandMoM
(GOD is working in secret, behind the scenes even when it looks like nothing will ever change! JM)
To: Tijeras_Slim
SCOTT'S STICKY TAPES
Scott found out long ago that this situation couldn't be fixed by duct tape alone..
To: runningbear
GOOD!! Let the games begin. I, for one, will be glad to see the perpetual smirk wiped of off Snotty's face --- and the tapes, along with Amber's testimony, ought to do that!
8
posted on
03/23/2004 6:48:12 AM PST
by
soozla
(Putting "butter on the message bread" since 1998)
To: runningbear; Jackie-O; Devil_Anse; Canadian Outrage; Velveeta; All
If Gregaros doesn't get his way, and get another change of venue, The Judge has set May 17, as the day for opening statements.
I think it was the 17th. I know for sure it was May. Its the pits when you can't remember from one room to the next. :-)
9
posted on
03/23/2004 7:21:48 AM PST
by
Spunky
(This little tag just keeps following me where ever I go.)
To: runningbear
I know I couldn't possibly serve on that jury.
10
posted on
03/23/2004 7:43:23 AM PST
by
TheSpottedOwl
(Until Kofi Annan rides the Jerusalem RTD....nothing will change.)
To: grizzfan
BTT
To: runningbear
Peterson said he told his wife about the affair and she was "at peace" ....... He omitted to mention to Diane that as he told Laci, she was wearing a blue tarp and heading for a coral reef...
12
posted on
03/23/2004 8:58:24 AM PST
by
Yaelle
To: All
How many of us, IF we had the time to serve, would make it onto the jury? I would definitely be thrown off because my brother is an attorney and most importantly because I had a baby the week Connor was to be born.
13
posted on
03/23/2004 9:00:37 AM PST
by
Yaelle
To: grizzfan
Thanks. Grizzfan, for the ping!
14
posted on
03/23/2004 9:01:46 AM PST
by
Yaelle
To: grizzfan
WOW!
Thanks for the "special" alert.
It will be such a pleasure to watch Geragos
go down in flames.
15
posted on
03/23/2004 9:16:51 AM PST
by
onyx
(Kerry' s a Veteran, but so were Lee Harvey Oswald, Timothy McVeigh and Benedict Arnold.)
To: Yaelle
FOFL!
16
posted on
03/23/2004 9:48:18 AM PST
by
Velveeta
To: Yaelle
From the article above:
"Another woman said that if she found Peterson guilty of the charges, she would only recommend death and would not consider an optional punishment of life in prison."
That would be me...I wouldn't make it either
17
posted on
03/23/2004 9:50:39 AM PST
by
Velveeta
To: Yaelle
"How many of us, IF we had the time to serve, would make it onto the jury? I would definitely be thrown off because my brother is an attorney and most importantly because I had a baby the week Connor was to be born."
I think most of us regular posters would be rejected. I imagine they would look for people who haven't visted web sites on this topic or posted to chats or discussion boards. If you were picked, could you be fair? Interestingly, I think I could. I'm very good at being objective/analytical when I need to be and I do believe that people deserve fair trials. I thought it was interesting that the questionnaire asked if the respondent had training in psychology/counseling, etc. Is that something the defense wants or doesn't want? Mmmmmm I'm not terribly knowledgable of jury selection, although I do think it is more art than science. It's easier to predict individual behavior than group behavior.
18
posted on
03/23/2004 9:52:31 AM PST
by
drjulie
To: Spunky
LOL! If only I could remember where I put those Ginko Biloba capsules.....
19
posted on
03/23/2004 9:52:53 AM PST
by
Velveeta
To: runningbear
Sorry for the mental image, but I thought this would be a Scott Ritter thread.
20
posted on
03/23/2004 9:54:09 AM PST
by
July 4th
(You need to click "Abstimmen")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 381-395 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson