Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Repost: US seeks alliance with Moscow for raid on bin Laden
WorldTribune.com ^ | 22 November 2000 | Ahmed Rashid

Posted on 03/24/2004 5:51:25 PM PST by mrsmith

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: mrsmith
A PLAN FOR SADDAM Iraq News, WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 11, 1998
"Newsweek, Nov 16, explained US decision making prior to Iraq's Oct 31 decision to suspend UNSCOM monitoring, "Maintaining sanctions is at the heart of the new US strategy . . . The blueprint was developed last spring by the National Security Council, in response to a plea from national security adviser Sandy Berger. During last February's standoff, a frustrated Berger called one senior official, Richard Clarke, in the middle of the night and complained, astonishing (given all the war talk), that 'we have no strategy on Iraq.' . . . After an extensive study, an ad hoc group pulled together by Clarke concluded-in papers so sensitive they were never circulated below the deputy cabinet level-that, short of invasion, the United States had no good military options on Iraq. Airstrikes were not going to topple Saddam or force him to give the United Nations unfettered access. And UN inspections were overrated: it was simply not feasible to track down all of Saddam's biochemical stash." "
21 posted on 03/29/2004 6:21:41 PM PST by mrsmith ("Oyez, oyez! All rise for the Honorable Chief Justice... Hillary Rodham Clinton ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
October 25, 1999 The National Security Council Project
SANDY BERGER: "... There are two sets of issues that are not well addressed now by the government. And I don’t quite know what the organizational solution is. One is terrorism, which I believe is the most serious threat to America’s security. More Americans have died at the hands of terrorists than in all the wars since Vietnam. And if you put the overlay of WMD on it, because the fact is that the chance that there will be a biological or chemical or even a nuclear device introduced in the United States over the next ten years, I think, is quite high. So the next level is the general WMD proliferation issue. I think we haven’t got that quite right.

I don’t think we have the right sense of urgency within the government for those problems, and I don’t think we have the right structure within the government. And I don’t know quite what the solution is."

22 posted on 04/07/2004 3:51:38 PM PDT by mrsmith ("Oyez, oyez! All rise for the Honorable Chief Justice... Hillary Rodham Clinton ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a536608.htm

Who Is Osama Bin Laden? Looks like real threat folks. 08/21/98 Paul L. Hepperla
23 posted on 04/10/2004 7:52:34 AM PDT by mrsmith ("Oyez, oyez! All rise for the Honorable Chief Justice... Hillary Rodham Clinton ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0900/091900nj.htm

September 19, 2000
"CIA, FBI and Pentagon team to fight terrorism"
24 posted on 04/11/2004 8:35:06 AM PDT by mrsmith ("Oyez, oyez! All rise for the Honorable Chief Justice... Hillary Rodham Clinton ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson