Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Department of Peace?
Junto Society ^ | 3/36/2004 | Monty Rainey

Posted on 03/26/2004 1:26:45 PM PST by stoney

Department of Peace?

By Monty Rainey http://www.juntosociety.com

A Department of Peace? Maybe you’ve heard about it, since the bill [H.R. 2459] was first introduced by Dennis Kucinich in July, 2001. But now things are getting serious. A quick Google search will show hundreds of websites and news stories asking you to support this legislation. That means it’s time to take a much closer look at just what this Department of Peace would be.

Would there be any reason to oppose a governmental department designed expressly for the purpose of promoting a peaceful global society? You’d better believe there is plenty of reason to oppose it.

The proposed Department of Peace would be headed by the Secretary of Peace, a member of the President's Cabinet. The wording of the bill questions "whether the structure of thought, word, and deed which the people of the United States have inherited are any longer sufficient for the maintenance, growth, and survival of the United States and the world." The bill suggests as an alternative, that the United States follow the proposals of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) that passed a resolution declaring an International Decade for a Culture of Peace and Non-Violence for the Children 2001-2010.

This creation of yet another federal government monstrosity comes at a proposed cost of over $3 billion a year. The proposal includes positions for a secretary of peace; an under secretary of peace; the assistant secretary for domestic peace activities; the assistant secretary for arms control and disarmament; the assistant secretary for international peace activities; the assistant secretary for technology for peace; the assistant secretary for peaceful coexistence and nonviolent conflict resolution; the assistant secretary for peace education and training; the assistant secretary for human and economic rights; and a general counsel.

A program of these proportions will translate into millions of dollars each year being sucked out of the pockets of working Americans. Yet another important question is, "What will the Department of Peace accomplish that other areas of government (including the Departments of Education and Defense) cannot?"

An excerpt from one of the many pro-Department of Peace websites states; The crown jewel of DOP education would be the United States Peace Academy. A Gender Equity provision added to the bill could mandate each congressperson to appoint a man and a woman to the Peace Academy. What the US doesn’t need is another patriarchic palace on the Potomac. At 436 Congresspersons times two, there would be 870 freshmen per year. The Peace Academy would graduate some 800 peace experts each year. Military academy graduates serve four years. Peace Academy graduates would serve five years and then be hired into top posts of government and business. There would be virtual university peace courses and research centers here and abroad with results made available to the world.

This seems as yet another attempt to defer U.S sovereignty over to the United Nations. A close reading of the legislation shows a strange definition of peace. It seeks to address violence against animals but not unborn children. It prioritizes protection of homosexuals but ignores violence against Christians. Without striving for all human rights, including justice and freedom, peace is a useless concept. Otherwise, one could beat a society into submission and produce something "peaceful."

The Bill also attacks the 2nd Amendment of the Bill of Rights and our right to keep and bear arms. An excerpt of the Bill states:

SEC. 102. RESPONSIBILITIES AND POWERS.

(b) Domestic Responsibilities.--The Secretary shall--

(5) analyze existing policies, employ successful, field-tested programs, and develop new approaches for dealing with the implements of violence, including gun-related violence and the overwhelming presence of handguns; [emphasis added]

And while going after the Second Amendment, this same lot of legislators offers the following, further down in the bill:

(e) Media-Related Responsibilities.--Respecting the first amendment of the Constitution of the United States and the requirement for free and independent media, the Secretary shall-- [emphasis added]

I just love the selective support of our Constitution and Bill of Rights this Bill chooses to either endorse or omit. Further erosion of the rights of American citizens is not high on my agenda.

The reality is that H.R. 2459 is void of any substantive role in government; it cross-lists the responsibilities of other governmental bodies. For example, promoting "justice" is the role of law enforcement and the judicial system, not a Department of Peace.

Kucinich has the audacity to say, "Our founding fathers recognized that peace was one of the highest duties of the newly organized free and independent states." Our founding fathers would have never legislated peace because the defense and protection of our country is the only legitimate thing government can do to maintain or attain peace.

The momentum is building behind this audacity. If you haven’t already been asked to give your support to this Bill, you soon will. Have the courage to say “No.” Ask your Congressmen and women to oppose H.R. 2459.

Monty L. Rainey Email montyrainey@juntosociety.com


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; departmentofpeace; kucinich; legislation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 03/26/2004 1:26:45 PM PST by stoney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: stoney
Squishy.
2 posted on 03/26/2004 1:28:49 PM PST by Junior (No animals were harmed in the making of this post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stoney; sergiod
What he said
3 posted on 03/26/2004 1:31:33 PM PST by Calpernia (http://members.cox.net/classicweb/Heroes/heroes.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stoney
If the GOP-controlled Congress allows this loopy legislation to even see a vote, I'd be appalled!!

FReegards...MUD

4 posted on 03/26/2004 1:31:50 PM PST by Mudboy Slim (RE-IMPEACH Osama bil Clinton!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stoney
HCI as a government agency?
5 posted on 03/26/2004 1:35:37 PM PST by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stoney
We already have a Department of Peace. I think its headed up by Rumsfeld.
6 posted on 03/26/2004 1:38:22 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stoney
Department of Peace? Maybe you’ve heard about it, since the bill [H.R. 2459] was first introduced by Dennis Kucinich in July, 2001.

That would be "Ministry of Peace," and with it, Mr. Kucinich confirms that life imitates art.

War is Peace.
Freedom is Slavery.
...and my favorite...

Ignorance is STRENGTH!

7 posted on 03/26/2004 1:45:06 PM PST by Carry_Okie (Environmental deregulation is critical national defense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim
Do a quick Google search on the DOP and you will see that there is a major drive underway pushing this crap.
8 posted on 03/26/2004 1:45:22 PM PST by stoney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: stoney
Just to set history straight ----- At the start of WWII the US had a WAR Department and the Government issued WAR Bonds. We also fought WARS. Ah dem were da"good old days." Also, the word "gay" had nothing to do with queers.
9 posted on 03/26/2004 2:04:49 PM PST by Joee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stoney
Can I wear dove feathers at the peace convention?
10 posted on 03/26/2004 2:05:13 PM PST by sergeantdave (Gen. Custer wore an Arrowsmith shirt to his last property owner convention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave
Should I wear my big caliber revolver or bring the baby .22?
11 posted on 03/26/2004 2:08:58 PM PST by sergeantdave (Gen. Custer wore an Arrowsmith shirt to his last property owner convention.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: stoney
..and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace he shall destroy many!
12 posted on 03/26/2004 2:44:12 PM PST by Free_at_last_-2001 (is clinton in jail yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stoney; Landru; sultan88; jla; FBD; PhiKapMom; ohioWfan; MoJo2001; Diva Betsy Ross
"...there is a major drive underway pushing this crap."

Well, if it's just making it to FR.com's radar, it can't be all THAT far along...I expect this silly legislation will contract an early case of cribdeath, my FRiends.

Silly Li'l Lib'rals...MUD

BTW...I wonder what Kerry's stand is on this?! BWAHAHAHAHA!!

13 posted on 03/26/2004 3:09:03 PM PST by Mudboy Slim (RE-IMPEACH Osama bil Clinton!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: stoney
Department of Peace - I thought that was the job of the State Department.
14 posted on 03/26/2004 3:23:04 PM PST by tob2 (Old Fossil and proud of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim
I too want peace.

...of Nigeria.

15 posted on 03/26/2004 8:14:29 PM PST by Landru (Indulgences: 2 for a buck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Landru
Check it out, 'Dru...

"Hell's In Jean's Mirror!!"
(To be sung to Nirvana's "Smells Like Teen Spirit")

Load up on puns, my FReeper FRiends...
We shall not lose this Culture War!!
Right's victory is pre-ordained...
Oh no..."Truth" ain't a dirty word!!

Hello!! Hello!! Hello!! How low?!
Hello!! Hello!! Hello!! How low?!
We Know!! We Know!! We Know!! How so?!
You know!! You know!! You know!!

We're allRight now...we're not dangerous.
Fear our throng, though...we're educated!!
Left is STOOOPID...and outrageous!!
Hear my songs now...educatin'!!

All aboard now...to the Right, folks...
HOO's yer Leader?!
Fight 'gainst TREASON!! Yeah!!

(guitar jammin' interlude)

Power-grubbin's what Slick does best...
And fer this gift, Right is Blessed!!
Our FReeper group has always been...
And always will 'til Clinton's death!!

Hello!! Hello!! Hello!! How low?!
Hello!! Hello!! Hello!! How low?!
We Know!! We Know!! We Know!! How so?!
You know!! You know!! You know!!

We're the RightWing...we're quite courageous!!
It's OUR turn now...don't enrage US!!
Here Right is now...entertaining!!
All aboard now...to the Right, folks...
HOO's yer Leader?! Fight Fer FReedom!! Yeah!!

(long guitar jam...sit back and enjoy)

We shan't fergit...Left's such a waste!!
Hell yeah...we'll whup RATS by a mile!!
Our work is hard...but we sure don't mind...
Oh well, whatever...ever Right!!

Hello!! Hello!! Hello!! How low?!
Hello!! Hello!! Hello!! How low?!
We Know!! We Know!! We Know!! How so?!
You know!! You know!! You know!!

We're the Right, folks...we're contagious!!
Hear my songs now...educatin'!!
Left is STOOOPID...just outrageous...
We're the Right, folks...we're bodacious!!
Devolve Power...to the States, folks...
It's OUR FReedom...YOU trust US, bro'!!

Don't Deny US!! Don't Deny US!! Don't Deny US!!
Don't Deny US!! Don't Deny US!! Don't Deny US!!
Don't Deny US!! Don't Deny US!! Don't Deny US!!

FReegards...MUD

16 posted on 03/26/2004 8:20:41 PM PST by Mudboy Slim (RE-IMPEACH Osama bil Clinton!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim
It's absolutely great, bro.

But just one question, WTF's Nirvana?

...if not a state of mind? {g}

17 posted on 03/26/2004 8:35:11 PM PST by Landru (Indulgences: 2 for a buck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Landru
Thanks...I've been practicin' my head-knockin' stance fer the video...my kid brother told me that many grunge rockers slam-danced to this song in something called a "mosh pit." Glad I grew up when I did...sounds dangerous.

"WTF's Nirvana?...if not a state of mind?"

Zackley, bro...MUD

18 posted on 03/26/2004 8:41:20 PM PST by Mudboy Slim (RE-IMPEACH Osama bil Clinton!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: stoney
new•speak ('nü-"spEk, 'nyü-), noun, Usage: often capitalized. : propagandistic language marked by euphemism, circumlocution, and the inversion of customary meanings. Etymology: Newspeak, a language "designed to diminish the range of thought," in the novel 1984 (1949) by George Orwell. Date: 1950
19 posted on 03/26/2004 8:44:20 PM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim
"Glad I grew up when I did..."

HA!!
Me too.
Makes me love my wife doubly-so, y'know?

"...sounds dangerous."

...& that's not all.

20 posted on 03/26/2004 8:54:49 PM PST by Landru (Indulgences: 2 for a buck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson