Hyper X43a
Posted on 03/27/2004 6:28:43 PM PST by anymouse
Three years after its first test flight ended in an explosion, NASA on Saturday successfully launched an experimental jet designed to reach speeds approaching 5,000 mph.
The unpiloted X-43A made a 10-second powered flight, then went through some twists and turns during a six-minute glide before plunging into the Pacific Ocean about 400 miles off the California coast.
"Everything worked according to plan. It's been wonderful," NASA spokeswoman Leslie Williams said. "I actually thought it was the most beautiful thing I've ever seen. We've been waiting a few years."
It wasn't immediately clear what speed the needle-nosed jet achieved after it was boosted to about 3,500 mph by a rocket, Williams said.
The first X-43A flight ended in failure June 2, 2001, after the modified Pegasus rocket used to accelerate the plane veered off course and was detonated. An investigation board found preflight analyses failed to predict how the rocket would perform, leaving its control system unable to maintain stable flight.
NASA built the X-43A under a $250 million program to develop and test an exotic type of engine called a supersonic-combustion ramjet, or scramjet.
In theory, the air-breathing engine could propel an airplane to speeds of Mach 7 or faster, enabling around-the-world flights that would take several hours. The Department of Defense (news - web sites) also is working on the technology, which it's eyeing for use in bombers that quickly could reach targets anywhere on the globe.
The 2,800-pound X-43A was mounted on a Pegasus rocket booster and carried to an altitude of 40,000 feet by a modified B-52 bomber, which took off from Edwards Air Force Base in the high desert.
A few seconds after the craft was dropped, the rocket flared, sending the jet skyward on a streak of flame and light. At about 100,000 feet, the rocket dropped away.
The scramjet took over, using up about two pounds of gaseous hydrogen fuel before gliding. Applause rang out in the control center at Dryden Flight Research Center at Edwards.
Technological hurdles mean it will be decades before such a plane could enter service. And NASA's role in developing the technology remains in doubt, as the agency recently cut funding for more advanced versions of the X-43A.
Engineers have pursued scramjet technology because it could allow rocket-speed travel but with considerable savings in weight. Rockets must carry their own oxygen to combust the fuel they carry aboard; scramjets can scoop it out of the atmosphere.
In scramjets, oxygen is rammed into a combustion chamber where it mixes with fuel and spontaneously ignites. To work, the engine must be traveling at about five times the speed of sound — requiring an initial boost that only a rocket can provide.
A third X-43A could fly as early as the fall.
The booster on the hypersonic X-43A ignites after the plane detached from a modified B-52 bomber which had carried the X-43A to an altitude of 40,000 feet, after taking off from Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., on Saturday, March 27, 2004, in this image made from NASA (news - web sites) TV.
Three years after its first test flight ended in an explosion, NASA on Saturday successfully launched the X-43A, an experimental jet designed to reach speeds approaching 5,000 mph.
(AP Photo/NASA TV via APTN)
Stupid, stupid, stupid, stupid, stupid, stupid, stupid. Sometimes I just stare, slacked jawed, in utter amazement as the bean counters, clerks and jerks undercut such technological achievements.
To work, the engine must be traveling at about five times the speed of sound — requiring an initial boost that only a rocket can provide.
Now that would be a sight to behold, a rocket boosting a bomber to five times the speed of sound and then have the scram jet kick in.
Wander if they would launch from Cape Canaveral or Vandenberg AFB?
Another question that comes to mind is why not fire the rocket at the target in the first place???
The Cold War doctrine was a "three legged" force: ICBMs, SLBMs, and bombers. The idea is that if one leg is cut due to an unexpected technology advance by our enemies, we can still respond in other ways.
Otherwise it does seem redundant in that any point on Earth is reachable by U.S.-based ICBMs in under an hour.
ICBMs cannot be recalled.
So do I, but they need the funding for NASA for other programs, like Medicare, Social Security, Hillerycare, and various and sundry other vote buying schemes...........
Politicians are like diapers: they should be changed often, and for the same reasons!! (Ex. Ted Kennedy)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.