Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John Kerry's Own Words on 9/11 -- A Selection of Research (must read)
Various excerpts | 9/11/01 - 9/12/01 | John Kerry

Posted on 03/31/2004 10:19:48 AM PST by jmstein7

John Kerry's Own Words on 9/11

CNN.com, September 11, 2001, Congress vows unity, reprisals for attacks

Sen. John Kerry, D-Massachusetts, called the attacks "a declaration of war" that "demands a forceful response."

Added Kerry, "I have no doubt in my mind it's Osama Bin Laden."

"It's very much in keeping with the threats he has made," Kerry said. "The intelligence community has known all summer they have building up for some kind of attack."

Kerry said a number of attempted attacks, or plans for attacks, have been"thwarted" this summer. He said he was briefed by CIA Director George Tenet on this a few weeks ago.

 

CNN LARRY KING LIVE 21:00 September 11, 2001 Tuesday

KING: Senator Kerry did your -- did you committee on international opertions and terrorism ever actually fear something like this?

SEN. JOHN KERRY (R), MASSACHUSETTS: Absolutely. Absolutely. But let me join John and I know all my colleagues in just expressing -- I think all of us here in Washington are feeling in very personal ways the loss of what's happened here. I know that I had one friend I know of already on that plane from Boston, and I dread the learning of perhaps others. But for thousands of families tonight, there is just a huge loss, and I think in every American there's a sense -- there's a fury, an intense, burning fury about this and a determination to do what is right about it.

We have always known this could happen. We've warned about it. We've talked about it. I regret to say, as -- I served on the Intelligence Committee up until last year. I can remember after the bombings of the embassies, after TWA 800, we went through this flurry of activity, talking about it, but not really doing hard work of responding.

We need to do that now and I'm confident that the size of this, the nature of this loss and the nature of this attack are going to motivate everybody to come together to do that. And I think that's imperative. And we also, I think, Larry -- I was heartened by the president's comments tonight. We need to make certain that those countries that sponsor terrorism, that support it, that harbor these fugitive are as much a part of the problem as those who engage in the terrorist acts themselves. And we need to make certain as a country we respond to that. Boldly and bravely -- not recklessly -- but boldly.

KERRY: There are three ways to pursue it, Larry. One is multi- laterally, which takes more time. That's the way George Bush, the father, did it in the Gulf War. You can do it bilaterally, you and another nation. You can you reach an agreement. You can work together. And you can do it unilaterally when the circumstances call for it.

I personally believe this is a circumstance because of the nature of it. As Dianne says, many have said today this is an act of war. The difficulty is, unlike Pearl Harbor, this is a stealth enemy.

Japan was identifiable. We knew where to find them ultimately, you know, after chasing around and we could identify. Here, we know pretty much. I mean, there's had a great certainty among many people about where the fingers point. But ultimately, we don't want to be a terrorist ourselves.

We have to do what we do with the knowledge and the certainty that we can determine, but we must be prepared, absolutely, to move unilaterally if we need to, to protect the honor and the civility that we stand for. And I think everybody in this country would support that based on the proper response with the proper information.

 

The Boston Herald, September 12, 2001

Kerry said he shared the feelings of bitterness and anger that so many Americans are now feeling.

"I feel so frustrated and so angry," said Kerry. "The ultimate lesson here is that no one will make Americans prisoners. We're gonna come back and find these perpetrators. I think whoever did this will find, to their great regret, that they have awakened a sleeping giant."

 

Hardball with Chris Matthews: Attack on America, Sept. 12, 2001

MATTHEWS: Isn't our enemy, Senator Kerry, those who want to hurt us, the particular terrorists after us, like bin Laden?

Senator JOHN KERRY (Foreign Relations Committee): Well, he's an enemy. He's been an enemy declared to us since 1989. He's under indictment by the United States of America for his role in the bombings and the terrorist activities against us already. So the answer is yes, but--but there are very few organizations with the structure and capacity to do what happened yesterday. We know who those organizations are, we know who supports them, Chris. And I think the message now from the United States is that there's no leeway, there's no cover, there's no halfway measure by these other countries. You're either going to part of the solution and you help us to uncover and root out these terrorist activities, or you're part of the problem, and--and you begin to pay part of the price. And today, what happened with the United--with the NATO vote, Article 5, where our NATO allies have joined us in saying, 'An attack on the United States is an attack on us,' is a very significant first step in moving to pull together China, Russia and others to support what we do down the road.

MATTHEWS: Speaking of our level of commitment and the level of commitment for those who are against this terrorism, if we discover that bin Laden is responsible for this attack on the World Trade tower and on the Pentagon, should we try to kill him?


Sen. KERRY: It's legitimately part of the right of the United States to defend itself. That is what we tried to do previously, and we were unsuccessful. So it fits under the international rights that we have as a matter of self defense.

MATTHEWS: To go after him?

Sen. KERRY: Absolutely.
...

MATTHEWS: If that is the case and you accept that as a broad definition, are we, in effect, going after Afghanistan if we go after bin Laden, Senator Kerry?

Sen. KERRY: If it is--if they are unwilling to cooperate, and if it is proven they are indeed linked in a state-sponsored way, or otherwise harboring him...

MATTHEWS: And they let him live there.

Sen. KERRY: They have until this date, which is precisely why I said on the floor of the Senate today, we know who does it, we should demand of them that they turn him over, and if they have that power and don't do it, then we should proceed, under the color of law--John is absolutely correct--look, the United States, who is defending civilization here, does not want to suddenly become uncivilized in fighting those people we say are uncivilized.

We have some standards to live up to, but we should not allow a--a sort of legal cloud to get in the way of the military concept of this. That was not a hijacking yesterday that hit a--a--a target accidentally. That was a human bomb. That was a bomb, a missile, a--a weapon of war that was targeted specifically against the United States of America. And--and we can't have the rhetoric, Chris, that on the one hand says, 'Oh, everything has changed because of this. This was an act of war, and life has changed in America, and we're going to stamp out terrorism,' and the next act put--put barriers in front of our ability to defend ourselves. I believe we want to do it under the color of law.

MATTHEWS: Right.


Sen. KERRY: I think we should do everything possible to move multilaterally and to do it with certainty in a way that--that will pass muster, if you will, internationally. But we should not be hampered in our ability to defend ourselves, and we should proceed unilaterally, if in the end that is the only way we can protect the national security interests of the country.

MATTHEWS: What about if all--if we all go through this kind of scrutiny, Senator, then we all have to get to the plane earlier. Now, everybody in this--everybody--and you three know how get to the plane late because you have to run around like nuts sometimes. How do we get people to come to the airport--they always say, 'Please come two hours ahead.' Nobody comes two hours ahead. But if you did--you'd have to to go through this screening you're talking about.

Sen. KERRY: Well, it--if you have that kind of screening. But, you know, there's a much larger issue here, Chris, which Washington has not yet confronted, and that is what is it really going to take to fight a, quote, "war against terrorism"? And people are throwing the terms around right now without the full consideration. As John McCain and Max Cleland and I and others know pretty well, the first strike in war is rarely the last strike. The first bullets fired are not the last, and it's generally not the worst event. And so we need to be prepared that if we're going to do what I believe all of us think we have to do, this is a longer haul, and it's going to carry its risks. So we are going to have to be prepared for much tougher process in public places, airports, security, and people are going to have to get used to it, and some of the thing that have traditionally governed how we approach this balance of--of sort of personal access, etc., under that kind of footing is going to be subject to tests.

MATTHEWS: We have two reasons why people in the Mideast may not like us, if it turns out it is bin Laden, and everyone is saying it is. One, we're the western culture, we have different--the different attitudes toward women and their rights. We have different attitudes towards dress, towards life. Our religions are different in many cases. We're also very supportive of Israel, generally, in this country. Neither of those are going to change in our lifetimes, so we're going to have enemies in certain part--in the Mideast.

Sen. KERRY: Of course, we are.

MATTHEWS: There are a certain percentage of people who are going to say, 'We don't like your values. We don't like your friends.' How do we deal with that fact? This is a long-term problem.

Sen. KERRY: Well, they have a right--they have a right to do that, Chris, but they don't have a right to come and attack our country because we have that difference, and we don't do that to them. No country on the face of this planet has expended the kind of treasure we have in the effort to make peace, win territory back for people to be free, free to choose. And what we offer in this country is hopefully--I mean, we fight it still, we struggle in our own country to provide the full measure of civil tolerance, the full measure of civil rights.


MATTHEWS: Well, why were they dancing in the streets in the West Bank yesterday?

Sen. KERRY: Because there are people who hate us. And we have to be...

MATTHEWS: So Yasser Arafat says all the right things yesterday, but his people are dancing in the streets.

Sen. KERRY: Chris, behind the scenes they haven't changed. Their charter, their newspapers preach hatred. I've never met a two-year-old kid who hates. But these kids have been taught to hate, as John says and as we know. And the Palestinian leadership has not worked to prepare their people for the potential of peace.

Sen. McCAIN: In fact...

Sen. KERRY: That's why they were unable to move.

MATTHEWS: Let's--let's talk about America's predicament, day after, this is D-day plus whatever. One--you know, we watch Israel as third parties. We've watched the hell they go through. They--they maybe knock off a leader, a terrorist leader, and then a couple days later a suicide guy comes into a restaurant or a pizzeria in Jerusalem and blows himself up, and 30 people are dead, and it goes on and on. The dynamic is there: terrorism, retaliation, more radicalization of the people, more terrorism, more--more recruits for terrorism. How do we avoid, what you said a moment ago, avoiding the next strike, our first strike being the--the--the ignition key to a long series of back and forths that don't end?

Sen. KERRY: I think the dynamics in the Middle East are frankly a little bit different, and I think there are things that can be done on both sides that can ultimately change them, Chris. But the fact is that Ronald Reagan changed the dynamic with Libya and the United States, and I think the whole game changed yesterday. It may even have changed for Israel. It may be that Israel has now been given a permissiveness it didn't have before because the world will understand in a different way what's been happening. I don't know about that. I do believe that there is a road to peace in the Middle East. I also believe there's a road to understanding here. But if--if terrorists are going to single us out, attack us on our land, I mean, you know, the attack on Hawaii was not the continental United States. This attack is the continental United States, the most serious attack on our borders, I think, in our history.


MATTHEWS: You're talking about a surgical response, right, gentlemen? Nobody here is talking about kind of a--a punitive raid. Israel has been very careful through its many years of history, since '48, of avoiding any kind of a bloodbath. There's no (unintelligible). There's certainly no--except for the case where they had Shatila, where it was certainly participatory with the--with the Lebanese militia. But the Israeli government--both governments, Lub--Likud and Labor have made point of never going out and just killing a bunch of people. That's what we have to avoid here, isn't it?

Sen. KERRY: Yes.
...

MATTHEWS: Senator Kerry?

Sen. KERRY: People are angry, people are grief stricken, but they know this country has had an injury done to it unlike any they've ever experienced or in history, and they want us to do what's--what's correct to make it right. They don't want us to go off half-cocked, and I agree with John, I think there's a measure here of how we do this so that it is strong and bold but not reckless, and so that it takes the ground that the United States of America properly wants to take to set an example for how you--how you behave.
...

MATTHEWS: Do you think this is going to be cause for us to be more--to be more anti-Arab in that Mideast conflict than we are already?

Sen. KERRY: Chris, I--I...

MATTHEWS: As you hear these incidents today--you've all heard about them, people have been beat up and stuff like that.

Sen. KERRY: But I think it is so important to recognize--I mean, this is going to be difficult for us in America. We have a lot of good American citizens who are Arab-Americans. We have a lot of people in this country who practice Muslim faith, and they're outraged by what happened. And so we're going to have to be very careful not to repeat some of the mistakes we made during the course of World War II where we isolated people, we now pay reparations. It is difficult. This is not going to be easy. But the United States needs to makes make certain that we are clear about who the target is and clear about taking action that is appropriated. I am for a very, very strong response to this, but it still must be appropriate to the target and to the goal.

 

Federal News Service September 12, 2001, Wednesday

REMARKS BY SENATOR JOHN KERRY (D-MA) ON THE FLOOR OF THE U.S. SENATE (public domain)

SEN. KERRY: Madame President, I thank the chair. I thank my colleague.

Madame President, never in the time that I've been here, and perhaps in modern history of the Senate, have any of us come to the floor with such a weight as today, with our hearts literally heavy and aching with the pain of what we have witnessed and what we know so many families are experiencing today, and also with a sense of outrage.

The loss of every innocent citizen, every single person who went to work expecting a normal day; every police officer who put themselves into harm's way; of every fireman who tried to save a life and lost their own, and in the astonishing number of their loss, experience a breach in their special brotherhood and sisterhood that can never be healed; the loss of emergency personnel; these losses are felt by all of us in a very special, personal and searing way.

It's also fair to say that we are all of us heavy with a deep feeling of outrage and resentment, resentment for the killing of our innocent citizens, for the attack against our country, and for the fear and the panic that we saw in the faces and voices of our people -- children crying, parents, wives, brothers, sons and daughters waiting for word.

Yesterday I was on the phone to the husband and daughter of a woman, a friend lost at the second flight to penetrate the World Trade Center. The pain and depth of loss in their voices was excruciating, and the helplessness to do anything but to share that pain and offer comfort brought an even deeper sense of anger and of resolve for the acts that have occurred.

But it is also critical that all of us remember, as we talk about responses and war against terrorism, that our rhetoric be matched by our actions. If indeed there is a war against terrorism, I remind my colleagues that in a war, the first shots are never the last. The first strike is never the worst. What happened yesterday was terrible and horrendous, but we must prepare ourselves and steel ourselves for the possibility of worse until we achieve our goal.

And to do that, we have to be more prepared than we are today, and we have to take the fight wherever we need to and in ways that we are frankly not yet prepared to. I will say from personal experience that when you're in a war, you don't throw money at the enemy; it's bullets or other actions that are real.

We cannot guarantee that some fanatic is not going to find a way to upset the civilized order.

But we can guarantee that anyone facilitating or associated with such an act will pay the highest price. There are few organizations that could achieve what happened yesterday. We know who they are, we know who supports them, and we should demand that those people cooperate with us in making them -- in turning them over to us.

And finally, it is important for the world to see that we will go back immediately to the business of a great democracy. We must all of us be back at the work of our nation. We must show that our effort to build a better country goes on. The mission of educating our children for full citizenship goes on. The job of making our country stronger goes on.

And I believe that one of the first things we should commit to as a country, with federal help, that underscores our nation's purpose, is to rebuild the towers of the World Trade Center and to show the world that we are not afraid; we are defiant. To those who might say why create another target, the answer is simple. If we are indeed at war with terrorism, there is no shortage of targets in the United States. There is a White House, and a Capitol, and countless other tall buildings. This is not a question of targets, it is a question of strength and of our national resolve to stand up and show our strength. And that is the best monument we could build to those who died yesterday.

In Massachusetts, Madame President, we particularly grieve and feel the full measure of what happened yesterday. Two of those flights came out of our airport. Many of those people on those flights -- the vast majority of them -- came from our state. And so to all of those who currently await word, or those who know because of the nature of the flights, we extend our deepest condolences, and we grieve together as citizens of Massachusetts and of this great country.

I thank the chair.

 


TOPICS: Breaking News; Extended News; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: 2001; 2004; bush2004; johnkerry; kerry; kerryrecord; ketchupboy; transcript
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-56 next last

1 posted on 03/31/2004 10:19:48 AM PST by jmstein7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim; GunnyB; M. Thatcher; Hannity; OReilly; Rush Limbaugh; holdonnow; MeekOneGOP; Peach; ...
BUMP!
2 posted on 03/31/2004 10:21:33 AM PST by jmstein7 (Real Men Don't Need Chunks of Government Metal on Their Chests to be Heroes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
Great work! Notice that he considers TWA Flight 800 a terrorist attack. What did he know and when did he know it?
3 posted on 03/31/2004 10:24:59 AM PST by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mich0127; kattracks; 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; txradioguy; kjfine; 2LT Radix jr; Long Cut; ...
BUMP
4 posted on 03/31/2004 10:25:28 AM PST by jmstein7 (Real Men Don't Need Chunks of Government Metal on Their Chests to be Heroes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7; Howlin; prairiebreeze; Miss Marple; Dog; lysie; cyncooper; Mo1
Bump this big time.

John F'ing Kerry said in the days after 9/11 that this called for a unilateral response if need be. And other things that can easily be used against him.

Write just a short note to your local papers using a quote or two.

IF the press reports this, it's another small death knell to his campaign.

And you can do it unilaterally when the circumstances call for it.

Kerry: I personally believe this is a circumstance because of the nature of it. As Dianne says, many have said today this is an act of war. The difficulty is, unlike Pearl Harbor, this is a stealth enemy.
5 posted on 03/31/2004 10:27:34 AM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
jm - you are THE man!

In every Kerry article you see today, link this with a little intro to it. Kudos to you!!!!
6 posted on 03/31/2004 10:28:14 AM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
"I served on the Intelligence Committee up until last year. I can remember after the bombings of the embassies, after TWA 800, we went through this flurry of activity, talking about it, but not really doing hard work of responding.

Odd, that Kerry should mention TWA 800 on a list of terror activities.

7 posted on 03/31/2004 10:28:21 AM PST by Fudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
I served on the Intelligence Committee up until last year. I can remember after the bombings of the embassies, after TWA 800, we went through this flurry of activity, talking about it, but not really doing hard work of responding.

If the dateline of September 11, 2001 is correct, those words might come around to bite him in the ass...

8 posted on 03/31/2004 10:28:31 AM PST by ErnBatavia (Gay marriage is for suckers...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
Great research! Thanks for posting this info for our benefit.
9 posted on 03/31/2004 10:35:04 AM PST by Wolfstar (Yo, "real" conservatives. Spain's election is clear. Jihadists are on Kerry's side. Are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
The dates are 100% accurate, as per Lexis-Nexis.
10 posted on 03/31/2004 10:35:06 AM PST by jmstein7 (Real Men Don't Need Chunks of Government Metal on Their Chests to be Heroes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
SEN. JOHN KERRY (R), MASSACHUSETTS: Absolutely. Absolutely. But let me join John and I know all my colleagues in just expressing -- I think all of us here in Washington are feeling in very personal ways the loss of what's happened here. I know that I had one friend I know of already on that plane from Boston, and I dread the learning of perhaps others. But for thousands of families tonight, there is just a huge loss, and I think in every American there's a sense -- there's a fury, an intense, burning fury about this and a determination to do what is right about it.

We have always known this could happen. We've warned about it. We've talked about it. I regret to say, as -- I served on the Intelligence Committee up until last year. I can remember after the bombings of the embassies, after TWA 800, we went through this flurry of activity, talking about it, but not really doing hard work of responding.

11 posted on 03/31/2004 10:38:15 AM PST by adam_az (Call your state Republican party office and VOLUNTEER FOR A CAMPAIGN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland; Alamo-Girl; Hon; cyncooper
BUMP!
12 posted on 03/31/2004 10:38:28 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (EEE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
btt
13 posted on 03/31/2004 10:38:47 AM PST by GailA (Kerry I'm for the death penalty for terrorist, but I'll declare a moratorium on the death penalty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
"The intelligence community has known all summer they have building up for some kind of attack."

THIS RIGHT HERE OBLITERATES RICHARD CLARKE AND HIS LIES

14 posted on 03/31/2004 10:39:59 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (EEE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7; Peach; Mo1
I was heartened by the president's comments tonight. We need to make certain that those countries that sponsor terrorism, that support it, that harbor these fugitive are as much a part of the problem as those who engage in the terrorist acts themselves. And we need to make certain as a country we respond to that. Boldly and bravely -- not recklessly -- but boldly.

So Kerry is really happy as a clam with President Bush then? Because this is precisely what the President has done! So glad to know that Kerry believes in the soverignty of America and isn't an UN-suck-up-internationalist after all.

Prairie (do I need the sarcasm tag?)

15 posted on 03/31/2004 10:42:48 AM PST by prairiebreeze (We will not deny, ignore or pass our problems along to other Presidents. ---GWBush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
~*~*~ Flippity flop flop, flippity flop flop, Easter's on it's way. ~*~*~

Good work!
16 posted on 03/31/2004 10:54:01 AM PST by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
Add from this thread.

But let me say one other thing we need to do, and some people will not probably appreciate this, but I think it's an honest statement of what the United States needs to do. Globalization and technology have changed the perception of the United States in the world. And there are many of us who feel that we have not been doing enough or sensitive enough to the way in which we are perceived by many countries. We need to not only be tough here, we need to not only respond and ferret out Osama bin Laden, but we need to also listen. We need to also be thoughtful in some of the policies so that we can build friendships and build relationships around the globe and not be alienating quite as many people as we have, I think.

From September 16, 2001. Kerry blames the US for the attacks. We weren't sensitive enough to other countries.

17 posted on 03/31/2004 11:06:27 AM PST by tallhappy (Juntos Podemos!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
Think Condi just got her talking points.
18 posted on 03/31/2004 11:07:01 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
"Great work! Notice that he considers TWA Flight 800 a terrorist attack. What did he know and when did he know it?"

George Stephanopolous also refered to the "TWA Flight 800 Bombing" on TV one day but none of the news professionals caught it or questioned him about it.

19 posted on 03/31/2004 11:15:17 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
I love leaving you to your own devices...you never fail to entertain me

Fun Fact: Even though you said you don't believe me, he had surgery on his chin when he was in his early 20's I believe
20 posted on 03/31/2004 11:17:15 AM PST by Mich0127 (Massachusetts: the land of the pathetic..namely Kerry and Kennedy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
"So glad to know that Kerry believes in the soverignty of America and isn't an UN-suck-up-internationalist after all."

I think he has proven to be both. The long litany of taking both sides of a position continues....

21 posted on 03/31/2004 11:17:47 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
Maybe someone with connections can get this link to L.King & C Matthews to refesh their memory????

ATTA WAY TO GO, jmstein7
22 posted on 03/31/2004 11:19:30 AM PST by DollyCali ("Trying to keep the Freepers pulling in the same direction is like trying to herd cats." Richard Poe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
I heard it! Within hours of the attacks on September 11, Stephanopolous was speaking excitedly, hurriedly of the day's events. He was describing the atmosphere in the Situation Room right after the bombing of TWA 800. I think only freepers understood the connotation that day.
23 posted on 03/31/2004 11:24:18 AM PST by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
Oooooohhh!!! Thanks!!!
24 posted on 03/31/2004 11:31:34 AM PST by LayoutGuru2 (Call me paranoid but finding '/*' inside this comment makes me suspicious)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
"I can remember after the bombings of the embassies, after TWA 800..."


Boy! This certainly jumped off the page at a bunch of us!!!
25 posted on 03/31/2004 11:37:13 AM PST by Maria S (Assigned parking only...all violators will be towed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
Nice job...thank you.
26 posted on 03/31/2004 11:40:26 AM PST by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
Sept 12: MATTHEWS: Speaking of our level of commitment and the level of commitment for those who are against this terrorism, if we discover that bin Laden is responsible for this attack on the World Trade tower and on the Pentagon, should we try to kill him?"

Mathews is today bent out of shape for W asking Clarke to look into possible Iraq connections, as if we immediately knew with 100% certaincy everybody who was involved. From his quote, he wasn't so sure himself.

27 posted on 03/31/2004 11:47:41 AM PST by ironman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
Absolutely! Senator I'll-Say-Anything-To-Get-A-Vote-Or-What-I-Want Kerry said this in 1970:

“I’m an internationalist,” Kerry told The Crimson in 1970. “I’d like to see our troops dispersed through the world only at the directive of the United Nations.” Kerry said he wanted “to almost eliminate CIA activity. The CIA is fighting its own war in Laos and nobody seems to care.”

Compare that with this after 9-11:

"I was heartened by the president's comments tonight. We need to make certain that those countries that sponsor terrorism, that support it, that harbor these fugitive are as much a part of the problem as those who engage in the terrorist acts themselves. And we need to make certain as a country we respond to that. Boldly and bravely -- not recklessly -- but boldly."

So, WHICH IS IT SENATOR?? Which side of your mouth are you talking out of today?

Prairie

28 posted on 03/31/2004 12:03:56 PM PST by prairiebreeze (We will not deny, ignore or pass our problems along to other Presidents. ---GWBush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
Hitchcock, guest hosting for Limbaugh, just had a wonderful quote from Kerry, I believe from a speech at Georgetown U (?) on 23Jan2003(?). In that speech, he said something to the effect that we had to take out Hussein because he was a menace, and if Hussein doesn't pay attention to what President Bush was saying we would do so.

I'll look for that quote. I would appreciate it if someone else could do so, too...
29 posted on 03/31/2004 12:08:07 PM PST by AFPhys (My Passion review: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1089021/posts?page=13#13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

30 posted on 03/31/2004 12:13:25 PM PST by MeekOneGOP (Become a monthly donor on FR. No amount is too small and monthly giving is the way to go !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze
Ahh... here it is already ... from http://kerry.senate.gov/low/record.cfm?id=189831 In part,

"Second, without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive
regime. We all know the litany of his offenses. He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation. He miscalculated an eight-year war with Iran. He miscalculated the invasion of Kuwait. He miscalculated
America's response to that act of naked aggression. He miscalculated the result of setting oil rigs on fire. He miscalculated the
impact of sending scuds into Israel and trying to assassinate an American President. He miscalculated his own military strength.
He miscalculated the Arab world's response to his misconduct. And now he is miscalculating America's response to his
continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. That is why the world, through the United Nations
Security Council, has spoken with one voice, demanding that Iraq disclose its weapons programs and disarm. "

...{ internationalist waffle words }...

"In U.N. Security Council Resolution 1441, the United Nations has now affirmed that Saddam Hussein must disarm or face the
most serious consequences. Let me make it clear that the burden is resoundingly on Saddam Hussein to live up to the ceasefire
agreement he signed and make clear to the world how he disposed of weapons he previously admitted to possessing. "

...{ more internationalist waffle words }...

31 posted on 03/31/2004 12:14:56 PM PST by AFPhys (My Passion review: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1089021/posts?page=13#13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys
Why Kerry isn't testifying in front of the Commission is beyond me...

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=37642
32 posted on 03/31/2004 12:24:09 PM PST by oolatec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Thanks for the ping, Peach.

Words come back to bite when one has no principles.

33 posted on 03/31/2004 12:28:15 PM PST by lysie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys; Peach
post #31 ping

In condemning Saddam about the scuds he launched into Israel, we need to remember that one of the many military and defense projects/programs that Kerry voted against was the Patriot missile system.

And I will state again that the ONLY reason that Saddam started feigning cooperating and allowed the UN inspectors back in was because GW Bush placed the mighty military of the US on his doorstep. Kerry would have left them there, in those heightened levels of readiness 24/7 for much, much longer while he wined and dined with his French bunk-buddies at the UN. And we would have gotten no where with the UN and Saddam would have had even more time to burn documents, hide WMD and conspire with AQ.

All this, Kerry would endorse at great personal cost to our servicemen and women and to the American taxpayer. Without regard to either...

Prairie
34 posted on 03/31/2004 12:48:02 PM PST by prairiebreeze (We will not deny, ignore or pass our problems along to other Presidents. ---GWBush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
This really says only that Kerry agreed with President Bush at one time. That is a scary thought. Maybe it's just what Kerry would like to spread around.

The TWA 800 reference is most interesting.

35 posted on 03/31/2004 12:49:33 PM PST by LurkedLongEnough (Bush '04 --- in a F'n landslide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys; prairiebreeze
The left still doesn't understand that with the internet, their words can be used against them. But of course, they count on the complicit press to keep mum.

That's why it's our job to make sure that voters know what positions the leftists took, until they had presidential and other aspirations.
36 posted on 03/31/2004 12:57:10 PM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough
George Snuffalufagus was racing down the streets on ABC on 9-11 talking about the bombing of TWA 800...anyone have the clips and transcripts from that lil ditty?
37 posted on 03/31/2004 1:00:12 PM PST by My Favorite Headache (Rush 30th Anniversary Tour Tickets On Sale Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: oolatec
"Why Kerry isn't testifying in front of the Commission is beyond me..."

It's due to cowardice on the part of the Republican members.
38 posted on 03/31/2004 1:06:00 PM PST by Spirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
Great compilation of quotes...Kerry's comments directly contradict his recent grousing about our acting "unilaterally" in the War Against Terrorism!! Yer outdoing yerself lately, my FRiend.

FReegards...MUD

39 posted on 03/31/2004 1:23:13 PM PST by Mudboy Slim (RE-IMPEACH Osama bil Clinton!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fudd
This is the big thing..he lists things that were terrorist attacks, including TWA 800..interesting...and then says this: "but not really doing hard work of responding."

Hmm Mr. Kerry.

40 posted on 03/31/2004 1:28:40 PM PST by rwfromkansas ("Am I not destroying my enemies when I make friends of them?" -- Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
Yes, we now have to ask, if Flt. 800 was, as many on FR have long suspected, an act of terrorism, what to do about a "president" that covered it up? And the party that helped him do it?
41 posted on 03/31/2004 1:58:19 PM PST by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7; backhoe
Wonderful research. Now, how can we make the media pay attention?
42 posted on 03/31/2004 2:00:01 PM PST by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
I heard it too. And definitely raised an eyebrow.
43 posted on 03/31/2004 2:03:21 PM PST by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
BTTT
44 posted on 03/31/2004 2:14:05 PM PST by auboy (John Kerry is a bad actor. He can't remember his lines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
WINTER SOLDIER.COM

With antiwar role, high visibility


As an antiwar leader, John Kerry was arrested with hundreds of others after protesting on the green in Lexington, Mass., on May 31, 1971. The Nixon White House identified Kerry as the movement's most effective spokesman.

TWO WITNESSES COULD END KERRY PRESIDENTIAL RUN -- "The Phoenix Project"

This Land is My Land, This Land Is My Land
From The Callie Queerland, To The New York Spyland
From The Red Commie Party, To The Gulping Interns,
This Land Was Made For Me and Me

45 posted on 03/31/2004 2:24:51 PM PST by Happy2BMe (U.S.A. - - United We Stand - - Divided We Fall - - Support Our Troops - - Vote BUSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: auboy
"As John McCain and Max Cleland and I and others know pretty well, the first strike in war is rarely the last strike."

The first grenade found.....
46 posted on 03/31/2004 2:39:00 PM PST by Sybeck1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
We have always known this could happen. We've warned about it. We've talked about it. I regret to say, as -- I served on the Intelligence Committee up until last year. I can remember after the bombings of the embassies, after TWA 800, we went through this flurry of activity, talking about it, but not really doing hard work of responding. I noticed too, but I'm not sure that anyone cares anymore.
47 posted on 03/31/2004 4:16:07 PM PST by GEC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
I think we should do everything possible to move multilaterally and to do it with certainty in a way that--that will pass muster, if you will, internationally. But we should not be hampered in our ability to defend ourselves, and we should proceed unilaterally, if in the end that is the only way we can protect the national security interests of the country.
The flip side is that Kerry can claim this is proof that he (like Bush) doesn't need a permission slip from the UN. We here are happy to see the contradiction between this and things he's said more recently. Kerry will use this contradiction in an attempt to say, "see, I'm tough too".
48 posted on 03/31/2004 11:53:40 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
Great work! Notice that he considers TWA Flight 800 a terrorist attack. What did he know and when did he know it?

Amen to that! Has anyone read all of Jack Cashill's articles? Check out his archives - sorry I don't know how to make it a link.

http://www.wnd.com/news/archives.asp?AUTHOR_ID=164&PAGE=1

49 posted on 04/01/2004 1:39:55 AM PST by AnimalLover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
Yes, we now have to ask, if Flt. 800 was, as many on FR have long suspected, an act of terrorism, what to do about a "president" that covered it up? And the party that helped him do it?

How about Al Gore testifying before the 9/11 commission. Read the article in Jack Cashill's Archieves titled, Why Al Gore dropped out. Note the site that appears in post # 49.

Maybe we should start calling the Senate with a demand that we the people want Clinton, Gore and Kerry to testify UNDER OATH!!

50 posted on 04/01/2004 1:44:54 AM PST by AnimalLover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson