I call for an Investigation of OKC Bombing cover up!

The Third Terrorist ^ | April 2004 | Jayna Davis

[OPS4]

by Jayna Davis

Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols were not the lone conspirators in the Oklahoma City bombing -- the attack that killed nearly 170 people in a few short seconds. They were part of a greater scheme, one that involved Islamic terrorists and at least one provable link to Iraq.

That's the conclusion -- backed up by stunning evidence Written by the relentless reporter who first broke the story of the Mideast connection, is filled with new revelations about the case and explains in full detail the complete, and so far untold, story behind the failed investigation: why the FBI closed the door, what further evidence exists to prove the Iraqi connection, why it has been ignored, and what makes it more relevant now than ever.

Told with a gripping narrative style and rock-solid investigative journalism, and vetted by men such as former CIA director James Woolsey, Davis’s piercing account is the first book to set the record straight about what really happened April 19, 1995

[OPS4]

I want a hearing on this sad day in American History. While under Clinton's watch the FBI covered this up.

Let's have a congressional hearing right after 9-11 to see what was known then.

Ops4 God BLess America!

[Support Free Republic]

	Click here to support FR Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794 or you can use PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
Please visit the Fundraiser thread. It's on the Breaking News Sidebar

[PatriotCJC]

This is a theory that is gaining credibility

1) Al Qaeda or Saddam or some combination there of assisted in the OKC bombing.

2) Clinton and Janet Reno got the proof but was squashed. The implication was to great to be made public. If it was made public Clinton would have had no choice but for a true war against terrorism as we are doing today.

3) Ramzi Yousef took refuge in Iraq.

4) Would Terry Nichols or Timothy McVeigh acknowledge the truth? Probably not. In their own sick way they believed they were fighters for their country. They most likely believe that its better to die a martyr for their ilk than to die as a patsy traitor.

4) The bush administration had the truth, but could they make it public? No. If they (the Bush Admin) made it public that the Clinton administration had covered up foreign involvement in an attack on our country, the ramifications could be devastating on the way the executive branch can and could function in the future.

[cripplecreek]

You certainly wouldnt be the first to call for it.

Interestingly enough. As the jurors in the Martha Stewart and TYCO trials are making big news, some rather earthshaking juror related news has gone unnoticed in the Nichols trial. About two weeks ago the judge in the Nichols tral said he would "dismiss with predjudice" if there were anymore juror problems. This happened after 3 of the jurors were found to be cousins of the prosecutor. As things stand now the jury pool is down to only 3 alternets left.

[2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten]

The Bush administration (read Ashcroft) did seem to be in a particular hurry to execute McVeigh. Doesn't absolutely prove what you say, but it does lend some support to it.

[OPS4]

This was done under Clinton's watch, Bush had enough problems occurring in the middle east. This calls for a congressional hearing of the actual coverup under the 4 remaining years of the Clinton Administration, first and foremost!

Ops4 God Bless America!

[lilylangtree]

Absolutely! Start with Bubba & Hitlery, al bore, do include Richard Clarke & George Tenet and work on down.

[Sender]

It was very wierd how quickly McVeigh was executed. Look at other high-profile cases such as Michael Jackson, Scott Peterson, Kobe Bryant etc which are positively insignificant next to the OKC bombing, and they can't even set a trial date for years. My grandchildren may watch these trials after I'm gone.

But yet, in what was at the time the most devastating attack on the US since Pearl Harbor, we just wrapped the case up, concluded it was a couple of militia rednecks and closed the books. Never even accepted the evidence on McVeigh's Iraqi phone numbers in his wallet or the sightings of him with Middle Eastern men. Really strange.

Somebody sure didn't want to look behind McVeigh.

[liberty03]

Don't forget about Laurie Myroie's book linking Saddam and Iraqi intelligence to the first attack on the WTC in '93 (an event whose significance was so vastly underappreciated).
The question remains, why didn't the Bush administration cite these two incidents in its arguments leading up to the invasion of Iraq? Undermining confidence in the executive branch is no good reason, especially if that confidence is keeping us blind to real threats (which it most obviously did, if anything was learned from the WTC bombing in '93).
Patriot CJC, will you be so concerned about damaging the executive's ability to function when we end up with another president like Clinton, perhaps one willing to hand over U.S. sovereignty to the likes of the UN?

[An.American.Expatriate]

Cross Reference Post Bump

Richard Clarke's Suspicions of Al Qaeda Involvement in OKC Bombing (Book Excerpt)

[onedoug]

[Alberta's Child]

The Bush administration had the truth, but could they make it public? No. If they (the Bush Admin) made it public that the Clinton administration had covered up foreign involvement in an attack on our country, the ramifications could be devastating on the way the executive branch can and could function in the future.

I think your assessment here is wrong. The Bush administration has an even bigger incentive to cover up any foreign connection to these terrorist attacks in the 1990s than the Clinton administration does.

[ravingnutter]

Yousef and Nichols crossed paths in the Phillipines. Mohammed was Yousef's uncle. It is interesting to note that Yousef entered the United States on an Iraqi passport and had been known among the New York fundamentalists as "Rashid, the Iraqi". Another name that could be thrown into the mix is Abdul Rahman Yasin, a U.S. citizen who moved to Iraq in the 1960's and returned to the U.S. in 1992. After the 1993 WTC bombing, Yasin fled to Iraq and was given money and housing by Saddam Hussein's regime.

Other links

[ravingnutter]

"The administration does not want the victims of Sept. 11 interfering with its foreign policy," says Peter M. Leitner, director of the Washington Center for Peace and Justice (WCPJ). Leitner says the Bush administration may be concerned that if other victims of the Sept. 11 attacks also filed lawsuits and won civil-damage awards it would reduce Iraqi resources that the administration wants to use to rebuild the country. Leitner and others say this explains Bush's reticence at this time to report the convincing evidence linking Saddam and al-Qaeda that has been collected by U.S. investigators and private organizations seeking damages. "The [Bush] administration is intentionally changing the topic," claims Leitner, and sidestepping the issue that "Iraq has been in a proxy war against the U.S. for years and has used al-Qaeda in that war against the United States."

Source

[OPS4]

Thanks for this info.
Ops4 God BLess America!

[Maceman]

Everyone knows that the OKC bombing was the fault of Newt, Rush, and the Republican Congress. That's what Bill Clinton said, and he never lies.

[Alberta's Child]

Leitner says the Bush administration may be concerned that if other victims of the Sept. 11 attacks also filed lawsuits and won civil-damage awards it would reduce Iraqi resources that the administration wants to use to rebuild the country.

Leitner's speculation about a connection between Iraq and al-Qaeda may be correct, but his rationale for the Bush administration's actions is not. The U.S. government could render every lawsuit and civil-damages award irrelevant simply by formally declaring the 9/11 attacks to be an act of war.

[OPS4]

Simply put, Bush has decided to annihilate the enemy on his home ground. He has taken the war to them, and I for one back his play 100%.

Anyone who does not should realize the enemy acted without a flag or country. To declare war, one needs to have a well defined target.

We now have begun to intialize the task, and a declaration of war, may be coming, stay tuned.

Ops4 God BLess America

[Broadside Joe]

Another thread from this AM.

Very Awkward Facts [Clinton/Clarke turn blind eye to Saddam's terrorism connection]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1109922/posts

[jdontom]

Are you two still around????