Dallaire [yup] didn't attempt to write off what was happening as simply an extension of 'historical animosities' or attempt to equalize the behavior of the sides in defiance of the facts on the ground.
The differences are painfully obvious, and they don't reflect well upon Mackenzie.
posted on 04/11/2004 1:27:10 PM PDT
what were the "facts on the ground" which MacKenzie misrespesented, viz. "defied" and what were the "facts on the ground" to which Dallaire has done such superior justice? I wanted a fact-driven answer here, and not glib generalizations, which I thought was at least implicit in my last post. If that wasn't clear, I apologize.
posted on 04/11/2004 1:37:12 PM PDT
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson