Diplomats: Iran Plans New Reactor in June
Wednesday April 7, 2004 4:46 PM
By GEORGE JAHN
Associated Press Writer
VIENNA, Austria (AP) - Iran will start building a nuclear reactor in June that can produce weapons-grade plutonium, diplomats said Wednesday. Although Tehran insists the heavy water facility is for research, the decision heightens concern about its nuclear ambitions.
One diplomat said the planned 40-megawatt reactor could produce enough plutonium for a nuclear weapon each year, an amount experts commonly say is 8.8 pounds.
The diplomats told The Associated Press that Iran informed the U.N. nuclear watchdog agency last year of its plans to build a reactor, and Iranian officials have previously suggested the reactor was already being built.
But the diplomats said construction had not yet begun and that Iranian officials announced the June start date for the first time during talks Tuesday in Tehran with Mohamed ElBaradei, director general of the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency.
With Iran open about its desire to build the facility, the diplomats said the Iranian decision to go ahead with the plan was not an overt example of Tehran backtracking on pledges to dispel suspicions it is pursuing nuclear weapons.
Still, it ``sends a bad signal at a time all eyes are on Iran,'' one of the diplomats said, speaking on condition of anonymity.
International scrutiny of Iran's nuclear program has been growing since the IAEA discovered last year that Tehran had not disclosed large-scale efforts to enrich uranium, which can be used in nuclear warheads.
Traces of weapons-grade uranium found by inspectors and evidence of suspicious experiments led to a series of critical resolutions by the IAEA's board of governors.
The resolutions stopped short of forcing Iran to go before the U.N. Security Council, as demanded by the United States. But if ElBaradei gives a negative progress report on Iran when the IAEA board of governors meets in June - just as construction of the reactor is getting under way - Tehran could face action by the security council.
Iran argues that it needs the reactor to produce radioisotopes for medical research. But spent fuel rods from the planned reactor can be reprocessed to produce plutonium - also used for nuclear warheads - although the facility would be subject to IAEA inspections and other controls intended to make sure no plutonium is created.
Still, the United States and other countries may seize on Iran's plans as further evidence that the Islamic Republic is not serious about quelling suspicions about its intentions.
``We feel strongly that there is no need for indigenous heavy water in Iran,'' said a Western diplomat, also speaking on condition of anonymity. ``It's not necessary and highly suspicious.''
The reactor site is at Arak, next to an existing heavy water production plant. It is to replace a reactor using non-weapons grade enriched uranium that the Iranians mothballed, saying it was outmoded and lacked fuel.
Because enrichment can be used both to generate power and make nuclear warheads, Iran has said it has suspended all enrichment activities to prove its peaceful intentions. It also cannot buy enriched fuel on legal markets because of international suspicions about its intentions.
Seeking to counter accusations of continued deceit, Iran on Tuesday pledged to deliver a complete dossier to the IAEA detailing all its present and future nuclear activities by the end of April, ElBaradei said.
``We have agreed on an action plan with a timetable with how to move forward on the major outstanding issues,'' he said after meeting with Hasan Rowhani, secretary of Iran's powerful National Security Council.
Critics say Iran reneged on commitments to win international trust as IAEA inspectors discovered evidence of past experiments that could be used to develop weapons.
Adding to the skepticism was Iran's announcement last month that it inaugurated a uranium conversion facility in Isfahan, 155 miles south of Tehran, to process uranium ore into gas - a crucial step before uranium enrichment.
Iran insists the move does not contradict its pledge to suspend enrichment. But Britain, France and Germany - which have stymied past U.S. attempts to castigate Iran - said the plant sent the wrong signal.
Last year, the three secured Iran's agreement to suspend enrichment and cooperate with the IAEA in exchange for promised access to Western technology. http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-3950837,00.html
posted on 04/07/2004 11:24:04 PM PDT
by F14 Pilot
(John Fedayeen Kerry - the Mullahs' regime candidate)
To: DoctorZIn; McGavin999; freedom44; nuconvert; Eala; AdmSmith; dixiechick2000; onyx; Pro-Bush; ...
To Iran, the unrest next door is a double-edged sword
BY BORZOU DARAGAHI
For the Star-Ledger
Thursday, April 08, 2004
TEHRAN, Iran -- Iranian officials are eyeing the unrest in neighboring Iraq with a mixture of feelings: a sense of vindication that Iraq's U.S.-led occupiers are in trouble, unable to fulfill their plans to reshape the Middle East, and alarm at the escalation of violence.
"If your neighbor's house is on fire, it means that your home is also in danger," said Abbas Maleki, a former deputy foreign minister and Tehran political insider.
As clashes between Shi'a Muslims and occupation troops continued for a fourth day in southern Iraq, and U.S. Marines battled Sunni Muslims in Fallujah, Iranian Foreign Minister Kamal Kharazzi yesterday urged restraint on the part of the U.S. military. "'It is a strategic mistake if the U.S. thought it would deal with people with the same tactics (that) toppled Saddam Hussein," Kharazzi told reporters.
Earlier this week, foreign ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi said on Iranian state television: "The responsibility for the continued insecurity in Iraq lies with the occupation forces. We demand the rapid departure of occupation forces and the return of full power to Iraqis."
The United States and Iran have been locked in a cold war for a quarter-century, since Iran's 1979 Islamic revolution and the ensuing seizure of the U.S. Embassy by Iranian radicals, who held staff members hostage for more than a year.
Though Tehran was pleased to see its old enemy, Saddam Hussein, ousted by U.S.-led forces, Iranian officials have condemned the subsequent occupation.
A headline Monday in the conservative daily Jomhouri Eslami screamed: "The military forces of the occupation have created a bloody mess."
Critics in the United States and Israel have begun blaming Iran for the uprising led by followers of firebrand Shi'a preacher Muqtada al-Sadr in Baghdad and some southern Iraqi cities. Iranians deny accusations that their clerical government has had any role in stirring up Iraq's Shi'as.
"Iran doesn't want to see a turbulent atmosphere in Iraq," Maleki said in an interview. "It doesn't help Iranian national interests."
Indeed, Iranian officials and humanitarian agencies had just put the finishing touches on plans to repatriate thousands of Iraqi refugees living in southwestern Iran when the latest crisis broke out.
To the dismay of Iranian officials eager to unburden themselves of the Iraqis, the United Nations High Commissioner on Refugees announced Tuesday it was suspending convoys that were returning Iraqis to their homeland. "Security incidents and tensions in southern Iraq" prompted the decision, High Commissioner spokesman Peter Kessler said at a news briefing in Geneva.
Sadr, the uprising's figurehead, hails from the same activist clerical tradition as Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the leader of Iran's 1979 revolution.
"We are not hostile to America, but we are the enemy of occupation," the 31-year-old Sadr said in a Feb. 23 interview with the Iranian state news agency. "I only want a government based on freedom and rule by the people. Obviously such a government will be Islamic."
During his first-ever trip outside of Iraq, Sadr took the opportunity to visit Iran, where he reportedly met with high-level clerics. Critics point to this trip as evidence of Iran's backing of Sadr, but analysts point out that every Iraqi leader who travels to Iran -- including Governing Council member Ahmad Chalabi, a favorite of the Pentagon -- gets the red carpet treatment as Tehran attempts to subtly curry favor and influence with Baghdad's new political players.
For years Iran armed, bankrolled and hosted the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq, whose representative on the Governing Council, Abdel Aziz Hakim, is among the most powerful figures in Iraq.
Almost all of Iraq's political and religious leaders -- including Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Hossein al-Sistani, Iraq's leading Shi'a cleric, and secular pro-American Kurdish leaders Jalal Talabani and Massoud Barzani -- maintain offices in Iran.
"Iran has had very close contacts with all of the groups who opposed Saddam Hussein's regime," Maleki said. "Iraqi Kurds, Sunnis, Arabs and Shi'as all have had good relations with Iran."
This week, Iraq Interior Minister Nouri al-Badran met with his Iranian counterparts in order to encourage Iranian investment in Iraq, according to the official news agency. Each day, thousands of Iranian pilgrims cross the border to visit the Shi'a shrine cities of Najaf and Karbala.
Several Iranians were among those killed in clashes Tuesday night, according to Iranian news accounts, prompting officials to shut the border.
Even conservative commentator Amir Taheri, an exiled Iranian opponent of the clerical regime, wrote in the New York Post that Iran's clerics view Sadr as a loose cannon. "Iran still regards Sadr as a temperamental egomaniac who might not be able to play a major role in a delicate anti- U.S. power play," he wrote. http://www.nj.com/news/ledger/index.ssf?/base/news-14/1081412172268960.xml
posted on 04/08/2004 2:03:26 AM PDT
by F14 Pilot
(John Fedayeen Kerry - the Mullahs' regime candidate)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson