[Glenn]

It is not someone taking unfair advantage, it is a marketplace where people are responsible for their personal decisions.

The stupid, by definition, generally allow someone else to make their decisions. That the unethical (do you agree they exist?) make them for them is problematic.

[pageonetoo]

The stupid, by definition, generally allow someone else to make their decisions. That the unethical (do you agree they exist?) make them for them is problematic...

There are unethical people.

There are stupid people.

Are stupid people unethical?

Are unethical people stupid?

Is it problematic that there are stupid people, or unethical ones?

I watched a kitten go up and steal food from a doberman. Was the doberman stupid, or was the kitty unethical? Or, is it just the way it is...

Life is neither fair, nor is there any promise of balance!

[laredo44]

A fool and his money are soon parted.

The stupid, by definition, generally allow someone else to make their decisions. That the unethical (do you agree they exist?) make them for them is problematic.

It is the home buyer that made a decision and no one else. The stupid serve as bad examples. Always have always will.

What we have here is a story of some who tried and failed. We've all done it; it's one of the ways we learn.

[pageonetoo]

What they don’t tell you is that taking your money is about all they’re interested in. They care little for player complaints, and less about player suggestions and requests. They’re in this to milk you for all you’re worth, and that’s the first thing you have to know. -excerpted from another thread just now... "Everquest: The Real Story Behind Sony's Addictive On-Line Game

No difference! There is an old saying..."Let the buyer beware!"