Skip to comments.
Canada set for mass seal hunting
BBC News via Drudge ^
| 4/12/04
| Staff Writer?
Posted on 04/12/2004 8:47:49 AM PDT by NotQuiteCricket
The largest single seal hunt in half a century begins in Canada on Monday. The government is allowing more than 300,000 seals to be killed this year, many of them in a 36-hour mass cull.
The hunting of young seals for their fur almost stopped off Canada's east coast 25 years ago in the face of international outrage.
Animal rights groups are hoping to sway international opinion against the hunt, but Canadian officials say it is now both humane and necessary.
The seal hunt in Newfoundland and Labrador withered 25 years ago as brutal images of men clubbing infant seals horrified the world.
The US banned imports of seal products in 1972 and the EU followed suit a decade later with a ban on white pelt imports, taken from the youngest babies.
As a result, the Canadian government reduced quotas for seal hunting to as low as 15,000 annually - mainly for meat and local handicraft.
But with fur again in fashion the hunt is back.
Last year Canada increased the quotas again, allowing a million seals to be killed over the next three years.
It is now being conducted under tighter regulations and most seals are now shot, not clubbed, but the number of animals expected to be taken this year will be the highest in decades and once again it is drawing international attention.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.bbc.co.uk ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Canada; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: animalrights; environment; hunting; seals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Joke:
a baby seal walked into a club.
To: NotQuiteCricket
2
posted on
04/12/2004 8:50:58 AM PDT
by
Skooz
(My Biography: Psalm 40:1-3)
Comment #3 Removed by Moderator
To: NotQuiteCricket
With Fake fur being cheaper to process, softer, more durable, more variable (hue, texture, density) why would one NEED to kill seals in this day and age.
The market isn't there, in fact it's pretty much dried up. The need isn't there, as we now have artifical products superior in every way. The prestige isn't there, in fact it actually creates a negative impression. So why?
Unless, it's for a sadistic pleasure ...
4
posted on
04/12/2004 8:57:34 AM PDT
by
Hodar
(With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
To: NotQuiteCricket
a baby seal walked into a club. ...And went to up to prettiest woman in the bar, and asked "What would you say to a little
phoque?"
(Sorry...)
To: NotQuiteCricket
This sounds like a Southpark script waiting to happen.
To: Hodar
Before it became uncool to wear fur, I bought a beautiful mink coat with a fox collar. Little did I realize, that that little fox is a doggie just like my sweet American Eskimo. My Eskie is soft and furry with a plumed tail.
No way would I wear that jacket now. The demand for fur is gone like you say and it is downright cruel to kill these baby seals. Shame on Canada.
To: NotQuiteCricket
Baby seal walked into a bar
"Whaddya drinkin?"
"Anything but 'Canadian Club'"
8
posted on
04/12/2004 9:13:47 AM PDT
by
LN2Campy
To: RightWingAtheist
9
posted on
04/12/2004 9:14:27 AM PDT
by
NotQuiteCricket
(10 kinds of people in the world us and them.)
To: Hodar
If fake fur is so easy to make, and nice to look at, why do they use dog fur?
10
posted on
04/12/2004 9:16:17 AM PDT
by
NotQuiteCricket
(10 kinds of people in the world us and them.)
To: Hodar
"Unless, it's for a sadistic pleasure" Must everyone who doesn't agree with us be painted as monsters?
Republicans don't really want to starve children.
Southernors don't really want to lynch blacks.
Men don't really want to oppress women.
And...Canadians don't really want to kill baby seals just for sadistic pleasure.
We listen to this sort of vile lieing everyday from liberals. Must we also hear it from you, at FreeRepublic? Shame on you.
11
posted on
04/12/2004 9:21:35 AM PDT
by
laotzu
To: Hodar
My grandmother gave me seal skin/fur slippers in 1970. They were hand sewn from Iceland. She purchased them on a cruise while in port.
Those slippers wear like armor. They've lasted 33 years. They're not from baby seals, but from adult pelts.
12
posted on
04/12/2004 9:22:17 AM PDT
by
blackdog
(I feed the sheep the coyotes eat)
To: trad_anglican; Poohbah; BOBTHENAILER; section9; PJ-Comix; E Rocc; Howlin; PhiKapMom; Miss Marple; ..
Or a (possibly) tasteless joke from a Tom Clancy novel...
"It was now time to kill some baby seals..."
Debt of Honor
13
posted on
04/12/2004 9:24:10 AM PDT
by
hchutch
(Why did the Nazgul bother running from Arwen's flash flood? They only managed to die tired.)
To: NotQuiteCricket
I wonder how much of the outrage I can muster at this is conditioned from my childhood (in the '70s). There was an animated film about a baby white seal which recounted its mother being killed by faceless hunters. It was horrifically effective.
I am one hundred percent opposed to baby seal slaughter. But why don't I give a crap about minks, gators, cows, or other animals that provide food and/or clothing? Is it because they never got their own animated special?
14
posted on
04/12/2004 9:38:23 AM PDT
by
Mr. Bird
(Ain't the beer cold!)
To: NotQuiteCricket
Why would they want to kill baby seals during Catholic church services?
15
posted on
04/12/2004 9:45:43 AM PDT
by
Andyman
To: laotzu
And...Canadians don't really want to kill baby seals just for sadistic pleasure. Then consider the method to your 'harvest'. First, your prey is a baby seal. The seal is surrounded by a line of men, who cut of it's only escape path. It is then terrified as it is separated from it's mother, then, it is bludgeoned to death with a club. There are documented (and video taped) instances that the babies are not even dead before they are skinned. Yes, skinned alive.
When I hunt, I hunt for food. The animal is killed with a rifle, quickly and as painlessly as possible. I do not shoot fawns .... ever. The hide is kept, the meat is kept. The only waste are the internal organs, which are left for whatever predator may be around.
Contrast this to baby seals, who have no means of escape, no means of defending itself, and is killed in a manner that is not fast or painless. The meat is left on the ice, and only the hide is taken. The hide is not 'required' for anything, as there are alternative means to acquire fur. That is the difference.
16
posted on
04/12/2004 9:54:52 AM PDT
by
Hodar
(With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
To: Mr. Bird
Well, they are pretty freakin' cute.
17
posted on
04/12/2004 10:22:47 AM PDT
by
wingnutx
(Are you a monthly donor? Why not? (the freeper formerly known as Britton J Wingnutx))
To: Hodar
Well stated.
18
posted on
04/12/2004 10:34:55 AM PDT
by
Skooz
(My Biography: Psalm 40:1-3)
To: Hodar
"why would one NEED to kill seals in this day and age."
Probably because they are hurting the fishing industry. Seals eat a lot of fish.
19
posted on
04/12/2004 11:15:19 AM PDT
by
monday
To: Hodar
"When I hunt, I hunt for food. The animal is killed with a rifle, quickly and as painlessly as possible."
Seal skins with bullet holes in them are not worth as much money.
20
posted on
04/12/2004 11:21:17 AM PDT
by
monday
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson