Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clarke book has errors about arrest of Ahmed Ressam
The Seattle Times ^ | Monday, April 12, 2004 | Mike Carter

Posted on 04/12/2004 4:27:31 PM PDT by ValerieUSA

Was it "shaking trees" or shaking knees that led to the arrest of convicted millennium terrorist Ahmed Ressam? As former White House counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke tells it in his book "Against All Enemies," an international alert to be on the lookout for terrorists played a role in Ressam's capture at a Port Angeles ferry terminal in December 1999, his car loaded with bomb-making material.

But national-security adviser Condoleezza Rice, in her testimony before the Sept. 11 commission last week, discounted Clarke's version and credited a savvy U.S. customs agent, Diana Dean.

Dean stopped Ressam because "she sniffed something about Ressam. They saw that something was wrong" — not because of some security alert, Rice testified.

The debate over Ressam's capture encapsulates the controversy between Clarke and the Bush administration over which president — Clinton or Bush — took the threat of al-Qaida more seriously, and whether either administration did enough before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

Disputing Clarke's claim, Rice testified customs agents "weren't actually on alert."

At least one of the agents who helped apprehend Ressam sides with Rice's version of events.

Moreover, others involved in the Ressam case say Clarke's book contains factual errors and wrongly implies national-security officials knew of Ressam's plan to set a bomb at Los Angeles International Airport long before they actually did.

"I've found the exchange over Ressam one of the more interesting aspects of this debate," said Michael O'Hanlon, a senior fellow in foreign-policy studies and homeland security at the Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C. "This whole 'shaking-the-trees' concept has become fascinating," he said, referring to the notion that law enforcement was on the lookout for terrorists.

Ressam's arrest came on President Clinton's watch. Early that month, Clarke wrote in his book, the United States had learned terrorists linked to Osama bin Laden were planning as many as 15 attacks on Americans worldwide as the millennium approached.

Clarke, who worked for both Clinton and Bush, said he convened the Counter-terrorism Security Group, which he chaired, and sent out warnings both overseas and to local, state and federal law-enforcement agencies around the country to be on heightened alert for suspicious activity. "And then we waited," he wrote.

"The break came in an unlikely location," Clarke wrote, describing Ressam's arrest by customs agents during a "routine screening."

According to a former customs agent who was involved, Clarke's version, laid out in one chapter of his book, wrongly implies they were on "heightened alert" and somehow looking for terrorists.

"No," was the terse reply of Michael Chapman, one of the customs agents who arrested Ressam, when asked if he was aware of a security alert.

"We were on no more alert than we're always on. That is a matter of public record," said Chapman, now a Clallam County commissioner.

A review of the trial testimony of Chapman, Dean and two other U.S. customs agents involved in the arrest turned up no reference to a security alert.

Rather, it supports Chapman's assessment that agents thought Ressam was smuggling drugs when they opened the trunk of his rental car and found bags of white powder buried in the spare-tire well. Only after finding several plastic black boxes, containing watches wired to circuit boards, did anyone suspect a bomb.

Dean has said repeatedly she singled Ressam out for a closer look because he was nervous, fumbling and sweating. Ressam has since told agents he was sick, and federal sources have confirmed Ressam had apparently gotten malaria while at terrorist-training camps in Afghanistan.

Clarke's version of that night contains other errors. Some of them are minor. But one implies national-security officials knew more about Ressam's plans than they could have at the time:

• Clarke wrote that Ressam bolted and left his car on the ferry. In fact, Ressam drove off the ferry and ran when he was stopped for inspection.

• Clarke reported Dean ran after Ressam. Actually, two other agents gave chase.

• More significantly, Clarke wrote that agents had found "explosives and a map of the Los Angeles International Airport" in the car, implying the threat to the airport was known almost immediately.

There was no map in the car. A map of Greater Los Angeles was found days later in Ressam's apartment in Montreal. Nobody had a clue for nearly 11 months that Los Angeles was a target.

Circles scrawled on the map around three L.A.-area airports weren't found until October 2000, after the document had been turned over to the FBI. It wasn't until Ressam began cooperating in May 2001 that his actual target was known for sure.

In fact, in the weeks after Ressam's capture, officials in Seattle were so unsure about his actual target that then-Mayor Paul Schell canceled the city's popular New Year's Eve celebration at Seattle Center, thinking the Space Needle could be a target.

• Clarke reported Canadians had somehow "missed" the existence of Ressam's cell of radical Algerian Muslims in Montreal and that, after Ressam's arrest, the Canadian government cooperated.

According to testimony at Ressam's trial and interviews with Canadian intelligence officials, Ressam and the cell in Montreal had been under surveillance for at least two years before Ressam's arrest. But the Canadian Security Intelligence Service never told anyone.

U.S. prosecutors have complained bitterly about Canada's foot-dragging as the Ressam case proceeded. Canadian prosecutors blocked U.S. access to at least one crucial witness — an Algerian who gave Ressam a gun and talked about blowing up Jews in Montreal.

Indeed, the U.S. came within hours of dropping charges against Ressam on the eve of his March 2001 trial because the Canadian government attempted to withdraw the witnesses.

King County Superior Court Judge Steven Gonzalez, who, in 2001, was one of three federal prosecutors who tried Ressam in Los Angeles, agreed some of Clarke's assertions "are not consistent with the evidence at trial."

Martha Levin, a publicist at Free Press, the Simon & Schuster subsidiary that published "Against All Enemies," said Clarke had no comment about the errors. "Free Press makes it a policy not to discuss internal editorial processes," she said.

Another Brookings scholar, Stephen Hess, a senior fellow on governmental studies and an authority on Washington and the media, said errors in memoirs are not unusual or particularly significant unless they affect the broader point or conclusion the author is drawing.

"So it's hard to say what the significance of these errors are," Hess added. "Whether you agree with him or not, I don't think anybody has accused Dick Clarke of being sloppy."

And Clarke's conclusion remains valid. Al-Qaida, he wrote, was here — and actively attempting to attack the United States.

Mike Carter: 206-464-3706 or mcarter@seattletimes.com


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: againstallenemies; deception; falsehoods; lies; rice; richardclarke; ripoff
Errors? LIES!
1 posted on 04/12/2004 4:27:32 PM PDT by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ValerieUSA
Clarke,padding his part,arrogant and wrong on the actual events...but not sloppy with the truth?
2 posted on 04/12/2004 4:31:55 PM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ValerieUSA
Martha Levin, a publicist at Free Press, the Simon & Schuster Shyster subsidiary that published "Against All Enemies," said Clarke had no comment about the errors. "Free Press makes it a policy not to discuss internal editorial processes lies published by Free Press," she said.
3 posted on 04/12/2004 4:34:16 PM PDT by Eala (Sacrificing tagline fame for... TRAD ANGLICAN RESOURCE PAGE: http://eala.freeservers.com/anglican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ValerieUSA
Uh, "Mistakes have been made," but attacking the truth tellers is more important. What do lies matter when you're on the Democrat side?
4 posted on 04/12/2004 4:34:58 PM PDT by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them, or they like us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ValerieUSA
I think I like this guy, Mike Carter.
5 posted on 04/12/2004 4:37:18 PM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ValerieUSA
Clark lied?
I'm shocked....NOT.

He's a democrat, a Clinton admirer and protector..
Of course the clymer lied....


Semper Fi
6 posted on 04/12/2004 4:40:13 PM PDT by river rat (You may turn the other cheek...But I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ValerieUSA
Gee. This report cites not one, but two Brookings "experts." No mention that Brookings is a liberal, politically partisan, Democratic Party-aligned entity.

d.o.l.

Criminal Number 18F

7 posted on 04/12/2004 4:59:54 PM PDT by Criminal Number 18F
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
One also wonders if Canada is for us or against us?
8 posted on 04/12/2004 5:07:16 PM PDT by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ValerieUSA
Clarke's credibility keeps getting lower. Like Gore and Kerry, he might be considered a pathological liar.
9 posted on 04/12/2004 5:09:49 PM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ValerieUSA
OR ..... Did Canadian Intelligence distrust the Clinton administration and officials so much that they didn't want to release too many details to them and thereby compromise their defense of Montreal against attacks ?
10 posted on 04/12/2004 5:10:15 PM PDT by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ValerieUSA
One wonders.
11 posted on 04/12/2004 5:14:42 PM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ValerieUSA
If PBS reruns the Frontline show on the Ressam, you should watch it. Canada's policies that allowed him to get in the country so easily were shocking.

As I recall, Ressam had been previously involved in subway bombings in France. Frontline interviewed the French investigative judge who was in hot pursuit and couldn't find Ressam in Canada. Anybody who shows up on a plane gets in the country, but they have sign a paper that says they will later attend a hearing.

12 posted on 04/12/2004 5:31:52 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ValerieUSA; All
speaking of which, has there been a thread posted where each and every one of Clarke's assertions in the book been compared and contrasted with what is actually known about his version of events? If so, any one have a link?
13 posted on 04/12/2004 5:44:08 PM PDT by SCHROLL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/news/nation-world/terroristwithin/characters.html

The Seattle Times has an excellent series called "The Terrorist Within."

I've heard other Clinton pukes grab credit for the arrest. Ms Halfbright for one.

14 posted on 04/12/2004 5:53:38 PM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (Benedict Arnold was a hero for both sides in the same war, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ValerieUSA
The Seattle Times is writing about this because it is a local story to them. I wonder if the national press will pick this up.

(Just kidding)
15 posted on 04/12/2004 6:07:53 PM PDT by Inyokern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze; onyx; CyberAnt; BigSkyFreeper; Tamsey; mrs tiggywinkle; redlipstick; cyncooper; ...
At least one of the agents who helped apprehend Ressam sides with Rice's version of events.

Moreover, others involved in the Ressam case say Clarke's book contains factual errors and wrongly implies national-security officials knew of Ressam's plan to set a bomb at Los Angeles International Airport long before they actually did.

FYI ping

16 posted on 04/12/2004 11:44:55 PM PDT by Mo1 (Make Michael Moore cry.... DONATE MONTHLY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson