Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Guilt-Free SUV?
Newsweek ^ | 4/13/04 | Gersh Kuntzman

Posted on 04/13/2004 8:15:11 AM PDT by NYC Republican

Ford has made a hybrid-powered SUV that gets more miles to the gallon—and emits less pollution—than most cars. Our columnist puts it to the testWEB-EXCLUSIVE

COMMENTARY

By Gersh Kuntzman Newsweek

Updated: 2:49 p.m. ET April 12, 2004April 12 - Look out, my fellow liberals, but we're about to get run over by an SUV! Ford has just introduced one that gets 40 miles a gallon and puts out less pollution than an electric car.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: environment; ford; hybrid; hybridsuv; suv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-94 next last
Can anyone explain why they always go after SUVs and never after mini-vans, which have about the same mileage per gallon???
1 posted on 04/13/2004 8:15:11 AM PDT by NYC Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican
At least this idiot identified himself as a liberal.
2 posted on 04/13/2004 8:16:10 AM PDT by sauropod (Life is too short to read articles written by Upper West Side twits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
The running over by an SUV part sounds good.
3 posted on 04/13/2004 8:17:12 AM PDT by I still care
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican
This guy sounds like quite the butthead.
4 posted on 04/13/2004 8:17:19 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican
I drive a guilt-free SUV. And I don't need a stinkin' hybrid engine to make it so. Ya just need to have the proper filter installed - the one in your head that filters out liberal idiocy.
5 posted on 04/13/2004 8:17:27 AM PDT by dirtboy (John Kerry - Hillary without the fat ankles and the FBI files...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican
Weird how liberals do *everything* through a political prism. Even car reviews.

Severe oddness.
6 posted on 04/13/2004 8:18:01 AM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican
I think it has to do with the different safety problems posed with SUVs. Manufacturers are already dealing with some of those. But heck, if they make them safer and more fuel-efficient, I might even buy one.
7 posted on 04/13/2004 8:18:13 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican
It's just liberal dingbat pack mentality.

Their television told them to hate SUVs, so they hate them to the core of their souls.

I hope their television tells them all to drink Drano.

8 posted on 04/13/2004 8:18:43 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican
A Guilt-Free SUV?

I already have on. A Jeep Grand Cherokee. No guilt here. (I can't wait until I can afford a Suburban.)

9 posted on 04/13/2004 8:19:58 AM PDT by Lost Highway (The things of earth will grow strangely dim in the light of his glory and grace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican
The SUV is a symbol of Capitalist superiority.
10 posted on 04/13/2004 8:20:13 AM PDT by MrB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lost Highway
Jeep Liberty for me. No guilt at all.
11 posted on 04/13/2004 8:23:39 AM PDT by TheBigB ("You know, beer and porn really DO make the shift go faster." - Tom Servo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican
Why don't they go after full size pick-ups which are the best selling automobiles in America and get worse gas mileage than most SUV's? My theory is because it's mostly white "redneck" types driving them and the liberals don't see they have any chance to sway them over while they see a great opportunity amongst bleeding heart moms. However, that doesn't answer your question....those same bleeding heart soccer moms are driving mini vans too. So, it beats me.
12 posted on 04/13/2004 8:24:19 AM PDT by volchef (I didn't fight my way to the top of the food chain to be a vegetarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
They already are safer.

http://www.mackinac.org/article.asp?ID=5041
13 posted on 04/13/2004 8:28:25 AM PDT by mpreston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican
Now that I've read the article all I can do is laugh, laugh, laugh. Yes, the mighty behemoth Ford Escape. That thing is nothing more than a raised up car. Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha. Yep, that's gonna sway us moms in need of a 7 passenger vehicle. Sure is. Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha
14 posted on 04/13/2004 8:30:27 AM PDT by volchef (I didn't fight my way to the top of the food chain to be a vegetarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
I do alot of things through a political prism too. I wonder what he would do if his kid had a "play-date" with my kid, knowing I was a gun owning, SUV driving conservative. Actually, I think my boy would figure it out first and decline on his own.
15 posted on 04/13/2004 8:31:18 AM PDT by stevio (2 wrongs don't make a right, but 3 lefts do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican
If you look back to the origin of the attack on SUV's you will see it came from the Sierra Club.

They want SUV's banned because they are a viable way to get into the national forests.

You can't run on most of the remaining access roads into the national forests in less than a high clearance four wheel drive vehicle.

So the attack on gas mileage and safety (or lack thereof for other drivers) is just a way to deflect attention from their real agenda while further limiting access to your national forest property.
16 posted on 04/13/2004 8:34:29 AM PDT by Pylot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lost Highway
Saturn VUE for me. Good ride.
17 posted on 04/13/2004 8:35:40 AM PDT by SquirrelKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican
" ... who once stopped letting his kid have play-dates with a neighbor because her parents owned an SUV, ..." Gersh Kuntzman

The guy is well named. I've never seen a whinier self-guilt rant in my life. Is there really a car review in there somewhere? I couldn't find a word about performance. (It was hard to do anything but scan this.)

"The Ford Escape, it accelerates faster than a slug. It tackles most hills ... if you remove the weighty plastic rear bumper. The Escape seats six adults comfortably ... and will actually move two. You may have to dodge molotov cocktails from lefty activists and pull off on the shoulder to let aggressive right-wing bicyclists pass you but you can hold your head up proudly ... if you open the sunroof."

18 posted on 04/13/2004 8:42:16 AM PDT by TigersEye (One nation under God ....... or war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican
after all, the Escape uses the same gas-electric hybrid technology made famous by Toyota's 50-mpg Prius seven years ago.)

This is idiotic. An old Mercedes-Benz turbodiesel and a Freightliner tractor trailer "use the same technology", but I daresay there's a quite a bit of specific knowledge and engineering that differentiate the two.

The idea that the powertrain of a tiny, lightweight vehicle like teh Prius, with essentially zero load capacity, can be easily transformed over to a full-size SUV without significant re-engineering is just ludicrous.
19 posted on 04/13/2004 8:42:26 AM PDT by babyface00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: volchef
Why don't they go after full size pick-ups which are the best selling automobiles in America and get worse gas mileage than most SUV's?

Good question. But I'd buy something that got better mileage than my 2001 Silverado in a heartbeat.

Why you ask? I'm an independent contractor living in a small SE NM town. The nearest cities are 2+ hours away in Texas (traveling at 70 mph). My job requires a pickup and some of my jobsites are 70 miles away (one-way). To be competitive, my clients only reimburse me at the IRS rate of 37.5 cents. Every penney that gas goes up or my gas mileage goes down means a loss that I take. If I can save (or make) a few dollars on gas, I'll take it. Yesterday I looked into getting a K&N air filter and a Tornadoair device to get a few more MPG out of the truck. If anyone has experience with either one (positive or negative), I'd like to hear it.

20 posted on 04/13/2004 8:43:29 AM PDT by CedarDave (Democrat campaign strategy: Tell a lie often enough today and it becomes truth tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
Don't know much about Tornado air device, but stay away from K&N since you are in NM. Read the marketing stuff and notice they promote higher engine performance but not higher filter efficiency. In dusty environments they let more dust/dirt downstream to screw up MAF's and increase engine wear.
21 posted on 04/13/2004 8:48:38 AM PDT by mpreston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
I responded above before I read the article. God, this guy is nuts! He stereotypes everyone who drives an SUV and actually believes the crap he spouts. He's the typical liberal that just KNOWS what's best for everyone else and if his ilk were to gain power, they'd DICTATE that we swallow that spoonful of medicine.
22 posted on 04/13/2004 8:51:00 AM PDT by CedarDave (Democrat campaign strategy: Tell a lie often enough today and it becomes truth tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB
'59 Chevy 3/4 ton. 8-10 mpg. No guilt here.
23 posted on 04/13/2004 8:51:01 AM PDT by TigersEye (One nation under God ....... or war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: volchef
Yep, that's gonna sway us moms in need of a 7 passenger vehicle. Sure is.
That's what annoys me the most is the people who say we should all drive itty bitty cars are people who also have itty bitty families. Some couple wrote to my local paper the other day saying those who drive SUVs should be charged more. Maybe I should be strapping my kids that don't fit inside to the roof? My husband would like to get something with better gas milage to drive to work, but we have other bills right now. At least we can say our Suburban is paid for.
24 posted on 04/13/2004 8:51:22 AM PDT by HungarianGypsy (Irony? The EPA standards state 25 mpg per car. Their own fleet gets 8 mpg.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican
I am working on my completely guilt -free dream SUV......
Ford Excursion with a Cummins turbo diesel with a 4 inch exhaust....with really big tires....a winch....a luggage rack...
pulling a AirStream...
Some day maybe I will convert it to run on french fry oil....
25 posted on 04/13/2004 8:51:28 AM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
To be competitive, my clients only reimburse me at the IRS rate of 37.5 cents.


At 15 mpg, and $2/gallon, your gas cost is 13.3 cents a mile. You are ahead by nearly 25 cents a mile (~$15/hour for your drive time.) I grant that there is a few cents per mile of depreciation, but if your clients are paying IRS rates, your reimbursement is triple your fuel cost.
26 posted on 04/13/2004 8:52:11 AM PDT by Beelzebubba (Your Friendly Freeper Patent Attorney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mpreston
What MAF's??
27 posted on 04/13/2004 8:53:58 AM PDT by CedarDave (Democrat campaign strategy: Tell a lie often enough today and it becomes truth tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SquirrelKing
Despite having to sift through the liberal rhetoric within the column, I have to applaud Ford in their effort to improve hybrid technology and apply it to a vehicle that people will actually drive instead of the potato on wheels that you see on the road today (prius, honda cv-1). Toyota Highlander is the next hybrid SUV coming out, and I imagine Honda Pilots or CRV's will be next.

The general impression (don't mean to apply with a broad brush) I get from Free Republic, is the tendency to ridicule fuel economy, hybrid technologies, fuel alternatives for fear that it would cramp our choices, or require us to swallow our pride because we hate everything the environmentalists stand for or support (being fuel economy, etc). Let's face it, we will never be allowed to drill for oil in Alaska like we need to. We will always continue to depend on Arab/OPEC oil. Our country has some of the greatest minds and go-getters in the world. If we were able to reduce our oil consumption by 50%, and rely on domestic sources (own oil, alcohol, bio-diesel - source of income for our farmers!!!), we could tell OPEC to eat sand. Nothing would give me more pleasure, and on top of that, taking the issue away from the environmentalists...
28 posted on 04/13/2004 8:54:16 AM PDT by Maringa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican
You'd hear a news report of some enviro-terrorists smashing the windshields of a few dozen Hummers in California and part of you would want to cheer on these freedom fighters. (Full disclosure: This column does not sanction vigilantism or violence in any form—except against Hummers.)

Whatever happened to tolerance and diversity? Whatta hypocrite.

29 posted on 04/13/2004 8:56:23 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maringa
Let's face it, we will never be allowed to drill for oil in Alaska like we need to. We will always continue to depend on Arab/OPEC oil. Our country has some of the greatest minds and go-getters in the world. If we were able to reduce our oil consumption by 50%, and rely on domestic sources (own oil, alcohol, bio-diesel - source of income for our farmers!!!), we could tell OPEC to eat sand. Nothing would give me more pleasure, and on top of that, taking the issue away from the environmentalists...

Agree 100%, and I'm in the energy business.

30 posted on 04/13/2004 8:59:24 AM PDT by CedarDave (Democrat campaign strategy: Tell a lie often enough today and it becomes truth tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
.....me, 03 H2.....

.....the wife, 03 X5.....

.....18 year old boy, 97 Disco.....

.....9 year old girl, 5 year old Quarter Horse.....

.....7 year old girl, 6 year old Quarter Horse.....

.....i do feel a little guilty about ALL that hay!.....

31 posted on 04/13/2004 8:59:29 AM PDT by cyberaxe ((.....does this mean I'm kewl now?.....))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
MAF - Mass Air Flow - part of your injection system that measures air flow to determine fuel injection parameters. They are not cheap. K&N filters require oiling. Unless the oil is applied in exact proportions, some oil gets downstream and collects on the MAF. Then add the increase in dust particles and you have a formula for problems. K&N's are probably ok in wet climates but not here in the Southwest.
32 posted on 04/13/2004 8:59:30 AM PDT by mpreston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican
Any SUV that I might acquire would be guilt-free. I am not interested in what screechy, misinformed, obsessive, know-it-alls think is right or wrong.
33 posted on 04/13/2004 8:59:49 AM PDT by Riley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
Some day maybe I will convert it to run on french fry oil....

I have an issue of Mother Earth News somewhere that shows how to put a woodburning unit in the bed of the truck that creates methane (or something) to fuel the truck. It works and it's clean. Why don't we see all these libs driving those? All talk no commitment?

34 posted on 04/13/2004 9:00:18 AM PDT by TigersEye (One nation under God ....... or war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: stevio
What the bloody blue blazes is a "play date"?
35 posted on 04/13/2004 9:00:20 AM PDT by IYAS9YAS (Go Fast, Turn Left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Monty22
Weird how liberals do *everything* through a political prism. Even car reviews.

The fact that he didn't allow his children to play with some other children because their parents drove an SUV is just SICK!! Talk about INTOLERANT!

36 posted on 04/13/2004 9:00:52 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: volchef
Hey hey hey......Let's not be trashing Ford Escapes here. I like mine. It was a good compromise between myself (I wanted a pickup) and my wife (who wanted a station wagon). Decent gas mileage, V6 (enough power, also comes in a V8, I think) and it has room enough to haul a few hundred lbs of fertilizer for my lawn. But enough with the free Ford ad.

I will say that the V4 Escape is an underpowered POS. Can't imagine how bad the hybrid version is.

And also - the gas milage will be at it's peak in the city because it will mostly run on electric. Can you say 'Gimmick'? Wonder if it gets 38 mpg on the highway?

37 posted on 04/13/2004 9:03:25 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: IYAS9YAS
That was his term not mine. I called it, "let the kids play and let's drink some beer".
38 posted on 04/13/2004 9:08:50 AM PDT by stevio (2 wrongs don't make a right, but 3 lefts do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican
Too Good not to index
39 posted on 04/13/2004 9:09:27 AM PDT by UB355
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wbill
I used to own a honda CRV myself. Nothing more than a raised up civic. I've moved on to the extended (7 seater) Chevy trailblazer because I've got 3 kids. I'm not saying the Ford Escape doesn't fill a need for certain people, but a full size family SUV it ain't and I think the moron who wrote the article seems to think it is. He's delusional.
40 posted on 04/13/2004 9:09:59 AM PDT by volchef (I didn't fight my way to the top of the food chain to be a vegetarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
The Tornado device is really an old concept, but it works. The idea is that you get better fuel economy through improved mixing of the fuel and the air entering the combustion chamber.

I have heard the claim of 1-2 mpg improvement, and about 15-20% improvment. Even on the lower end, for a guy like you who travels on the road quit a bit, that could mean pretty good savings for a relatively small investment of +/- $70 in parts plus the cost of installation.

With that said, I don't own one!

41 posted on 04/13/2004 9:13:02 AM PDT by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: cyberaxe
What the heck is a Disco? Sounds groovy.

I always chuckle when I see a VW Passat. It is pronounced 'pass it' isn't it?

42 posted on 04/13/2004 9:13:04 AM PDT by TigersEye (One nation under God ....... or war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Pylot
Thanks for the explanation. Now I get it.
43 posted on 04/13/2004 9:13:04 AM PDT by NYC Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
As far as the K&N goes, it will help a little. Fine dust will hamper its efficiency. If you have fine dust in your area, knock it out of the filter every time you change your engine's oil (or sooner). But, you don't have to clean and re-oil the K&N every time you change your truck's oil.

Try some Energy Release in your engine and tranny. Don't put it in your differentials, they won't lock again, ever.

Make certain your tire pressures are good, that can be a huge detriment to mileage. Use good gas. The cheap stuff will eventually cause you more harm than the savings at the pump. A topper on your pickup bed can really work to reduce drag as well. May not be an option since you are in construction, but if what you have will fit under a lid, or a topper, use one.

44 posted on 04/13/2004 9:13:32 AM PDT by IYAS9YAS (Go Fast, Turn Left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: volchef
A delusional liberal? Nooooo......

And you're right, I was just pulling your tail. When I have kids I want about 6 tons of Detroit steel wrapped around them, too. For now, though, I'd like an F150, but I also like to sleep inside the house. Mrs. WBill has a strong opinion on the matter. :-)

45 posted on 04/13/2004 9:14:39 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
I found the part about him not allowing his child to hang out with a friend, just because the parents own an SUV, especially disturbing... or comical... or both.
46 posted on 04/13/2004 9:14:43 AM PDT by NYC Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Pylot; All
Actually, if you really look you'll see that the attacks on vehicles the Left doesn't like began in the early 1970's, when the target-of-opportunity was called a "gas-guzzler". Together with friends in the Democrat party and government, gas prices were high, and the cars were regulated out of existance.

No more Chevelle 454's, Shelby Mustangs, Plymouth Barracudas, Dodge Chargers, etc...and no more station wagons, either.

Since Americans, by and large, prefer big, roomy, and versatile powerful vehicles, they gravitated towards the SUV as a replacement for the family station wagon.

Therefore, the Left is now attacking those, using the identical tactics it used to nearly destroy the American automobile industry then, with the same goal in mind.

Funny thing is, even if they succeed, SOMETHING will fill the demand of Americans for large, powerful, and roomy vehicles. Economics are like that. Artificially attempting to eliminate a demand will not result in its elimination; only its supply through altered means.

47 posted on 04/13/2004 9:15:58 AM PDT by Long Cut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Maringa
I'm not ridiculing the fuel economy I'm ridiculing the idiot who wrote the article who thinks that the Ford Escape is the save all for humanity. No matter how much it's raised off the ground the Ford escape is not bigger than a full size car.....most soccer mom SUV drivers go for the 7-8 passenger vehicles. This doesn't fullfill that need. Also, many of us proud SUV drivers are sick and tired of being harrased because we like our choice of transportation. If the mantra were the same for everyone including full size pick-up drivers, buses, vans, etc. maybe we wouldn't be so defensive, but there is an all out offensive against us when there are many other vehicles that have worse MPGs.
48 posted on 04/13/2004 9:17:35 AM PDT by volchef (I didn't fight my way to the top of the food chain to be a vegetarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Long Cut
Economics are like that

If leftists understood basic economics, they wouldn't be leftists.

No excuse either, with Dr. Sowell's Basic Econ books out there.

49 posted on 04/13/2004 9:18:34 AM PDT by MrB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: NYC Republican
Can anyone explain why they always go after SUVs and never after mini-vans, which have about the same mileage per gallon???

Or mid-size sedans that also get the same mileage. BTW, I already have a "guilt-free" SUV ... I don't feel guilty about my TrailBlazer at all. :o)

50 posted on 04/13/2004 9:18:49 AM PDT by al_c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson