Skip to comments.
9-11 panelist author of 'debilitating' memo
WorldNetDaily ^
| 4/13/04
| WorldNetDaily
Posted on 04/13/2004 3:55:44 PM PDT by ThisLittleLightofMine
9-11 Commission member Jamie Gorelick wrote a 1995 memo that established a "wall" between the criminal and intelligence divisions, hindering the ability of the U.S. government to detect the Sept. 11, 2001 plot, according to testimony today by Attorney General John Ashcroft.
TOPICS: Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911commission; aschcrofttestimony; ashcroft; gorelick; gorelickmemo
To: ThisLittleLightofMine
How is it that this Clintonista, let alone any members of the previous administration, is sitting on this panel? This is like the old line about Jesse James guarding the Wells Fargo Bank. Amazing!
To: ThisLittleLightofMine
Put Mark Levin on the panel and let HIM interview Gorelick!
To: ThisLittleLightofMine
Did Gore-Lick respond to Ashcroft's "revelation"?
4
posted on
04/13/2004 4:03:31 PM PDT
by
My2Cents
("Well...there you go again.")
To: Enterprise

"We Democrats own the Commission.
We Democrats own the schools and universities and the unions.
We Democrats own the media.
We Democrats even control the vote of the dead.
You bet that I personally dared refuse repeat DOJ requests for investigations of dangerous illegal aliens.
and I even personally arranged to stovepipe intelligence to make intraagency effective communication useless.
I even arranged for the illegal aliens who were felons to be voters for our Democratic party.
Ha. We even have Aschroft's and every RINO's FBI files on our home computers.
So what are you wusses gonna do about it? I have your balls in my hand. "
5
posted on
04/13/2004 4:06:44 PM PDT
by
Diogenesis
(If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
To: ThisLittleLightofMine
Don't forget the reason Goreick's new restrictive "wall" rules were put in place.
It was because the court which oversaw intelligence investigations complained about the Clinton administration abusing the process. 74 times I think.
6
posted on
04/13/2004 4:07:51 PM PDT
by
mrsmith
("Oyez, oyez! All rise for the Honorable Chief Justice... Hillary Rodham Clinton ")
To: ThisLittleLightofMine
Have any of the witnessess testifing come right out and say the reason the wall was an issue at all rests squarely on the shoulders of Jamie Gorelick? Can anyone state any reasons this was not done, and how could Gorelick refute that?
To: ThisLittleLightofMine
When does Gorelick testify--in public--under oath?
To: My2Cents
Gorelick recused herself from testimony today.....Not enough she MUST step down from commission
To: ThisLittleLightofMine
And this Biatch has the audacity to put her mug in front of every camera she can find, trying to blame this administration for 911!
To: Diogenesis
Gorelick: Another in a long line of raging RAT witches.
To: ThisLittleLightofMine
And once she's stepped down, she should be questioned by the panel for her role in what happened on 9/11.
12
posted on
04/13/2004 4:14:01 PM PDT
by
MizSterious
(First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
To: ThisLittleLightofMine
Gorelick recused herself from testimony today.....Not enough she MUST step down from commission She didn't completely recuse herself today. She recused herself from questioning her old boss, Janet Reno and Freeh. She did question Ashcroft but never brought up the memo.
13
posted on
04/13/2004 4:14:07 PM PDT
by
Bob
To: ThisLittleLightofMine
It's time the Republicans screamed loud and clear for Ms Jamie Gorelick to testify herself. !
After all the crying for Dr. Rice to testify publicly, the Republicans need to slap the 'Rats down and make their commission member testify under oath!
To: Diogenesis
"We Democrats own the Commission. We Democrats own the schools and universities and the unions. We Democrats own the media. Gorelick herself has her fingers in an interesting number of pies.
- She is a director of United Technologies Corporation, a provider of high technology products and services to the aerospace industry,
- She also serves on the Harvard Board of Overseers,
- and the Boards of the
- John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation,
- Americas Promise, and the
- Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
15
posted on
04/13/2004 4:17:38 PM PDT
by
syriacus
(Clarke + Gorelick tweaked America's security to ensure no terrorists entered USA via the Internet)
To: syriacus
And then some.
As interesting is the list of her law firms clients.
16
posted on
04/13/2004 4:22:48 PM PDT
by
Diogenesis
(If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
To: mrsmith
Ms. Gorelick; has put her lipstick on Bubba's dipstick for so long she's become intoxicated... FWIH she quafs it all off with a good long sip of Hillary's bathwater...
How'd this bitch ever get on this Commission in the first place? The harlot...
17
posted on
04/13/2004 4:26:00 PM PDT
by
gatorgriz
("The world is full of bastards - the number ever increasing the further one gets from Missoula, MT")
To: gatorgriz
How'd this bitch ever get on this Commission in the first place? The harlot... I wholeheartedly agree!
Who ever put her on any such committee? She must step down!
18
posted on
04/13/2004 4:34:29 PM PDT
by
mickie
To: ThisLittleLightofMine
To: Diogenesis
The, um, guy sitting next to her looks like a Gore lick, too.
To: Diogenesis
You know what is really frightening about all this? It is into the hands of clowns like Gorelick that we entrusted our National Security! Think about it! The security of the most powerful nation in the world, and Gorelick and her ilk were in charge. God Almighty - 9/11 is only a small part of the price we have paid because of people like her. All the families of 9/11 should write her an angry letter, and all the families of U.S. military and civilian personnel killed in Iraq should invite her to the funerals, and tell her - LOOK STUPID - THIS IS YOUR, AND THE CLINTON, LEGACY! YOU were given the power and privilege of high Government office, and you FAILED MISERABLY. How do YOU feel?
To: mrsmith
"It was because the court which oversaw intelligence investigations complained about the Clinton administration abusing the process. 74 times I think."
Combine that with Chinagate, and people ought to understand why some of us wanted Clinton impeached long before there was any blue-stained dress. The Clintons were not respected by the military. The Clintons could not be trusted with intelligence. The Clintons abused the IRS. The Clintons abused the power of pardon [even back when Bubba was governor]. The Clintons abused the power of executive order. And the Clintons later stole furniture out of the White House, which we predicted.
And yes, our call for impeachment might have helped undermine Clinton's moral authority to 'lead' soldiers into battle. But if he did 'lead' soldiers into battle, it would have been for his own self-gain, such as to increase Tyson chicken sales or wag-the-dog.
The difference between Clinton bashers and Bush bashers is clear. We had excellent, well documented reasons to call for Clinton's impeachment. Then the terrorist pardons came along, and 95 senators condemned him. But the rat senators seemed to later forgive him when he pardoned a crack manufacturer for cash. Maybe they wanted some of that cash? Or maybe they wanted some of that crack? For one reason or the other, or perhaps for campaign funds, they still bow and scrape to the sister of Hugh Rodham, the man who profiteered off the crack pardon.
What do the rats say? "Bush knew. And he's big oil." They chant their little mantra, confused by the words: FALN, crack pardon, tainted blood, dual use technology...
22
posted on
04/13/2004 5:08:31 PM PDT
by
Arthur Wildfire! March
(Backhoe's latest links: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1104239/posts)
To: ThisLittleLightofMine
So Gorelick wrote a "dibilitating" memo??? D'ya mean that he wanted to remove the hair from his memo???
Is he a metrosexual??? Like sKerry (Did I ever tell you about when I took my boat to Hue??? and shot the dead guy??? and scratched by CHIN while shaving??? and got another PH???)???
23
posted on
04/13/2004 5:13:30 PM PDT
by
TheJollyRoger
(G. W Bush in 2004...NOTHING ELSE WILL DO! (Don't make me come back there.))
To: TheJollyRoger
Soooo...Gorelick is the 'Ho.
NOW i understand why she wants to remove the hair froom her memo. It tickles Janet Reno's fancy.
24
posted on
04/13/2004 5:15:44 PM PDT
by
TheJollyRoger
(G. W Bush in 2004...NOTHING ELSE WILL DO! (Don't make me come back there.))
To: Enterprise
"Put Mark Levin on the panel and let HIM interview Gorelick!"
That would be a death sentance. She would die of a heart attack before she even saw his face, just hearing his footsteps.
25
posted on
04/13/2004 5:15:57 PM PDT
by
Arthur Wildfire! March
(Backhoe's latest links: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1104239/posts)
To: TheJollyRoger
froom = from
cheap keyboard
cheaper proof reading
26
posted on
04/13/2004 5:17:10 PM PDT
by
TheJollyRoger
(G. W Bush in 2004...NOTHING ELSE WILL DO! (Don't make me come back there.))
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson