Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canada 'sells US high-grade pot'
BBC ^ | Apr 15th 2004 | BBC

Posted on 04/15/2004 7:33:31 AM PDT by gawd

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 561-578 next last
To: cinFLA
But you concede the essential absurdity of Prohibition!

Excellent! We're making progress!
21 posted on 04/15/2004 8:39:35 AM PDT by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Most of what Walters says regarding marijuana can be de-bunked by simply visiting the DEA's own website.

Please feel free to debunk it then.

22 posted on 04/15/2004 8:39:50 AM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
But you concede the utter absurdity of legalization of cocaine.

Excellent! We're making progress.
23 posted on 04/15/2004 8:40:59 AM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
Of course cocaine should be legalized - that goes without saying!
24 posted on 04/15/2004 8:42:11 AM PDT by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
Are you disagreeing with my statement?
25 posted on 04/15/2004 8:42:14 AM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: John H K
What are they going to the hospital for...terminal munchies?
26 posted on 04/15/2004 8:47:32 AM PDT by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: gawd; All
"...He said the change had led to a doubling of hospital emergency cases involving marijuana...[sic]"

LMAO... So how exactly do doctors treat a marijuana overdose?

With a King Size bag of Doritos and a Super Size Vanilla Coke?

27 posted on 04/15/2004 8:51:19 AM PDT by expatguy (Fallujah Delenda Est!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
No, I agree that most liquours do taste 'bad'.

However, the REASON "Mixers" came into existance was because of the increased PROFIT, in the whole Profit:Risk ratio that prohibition creates.

Other examples today are: Crack, Ecxtasy, and Angel Dust (among others).

These drugs would very likely never have been created, if not for the War on Drugs. The drug sellers/distributiors need a more compact and addictive product to offset their loses from gov't seizures. Thus, if only 1 plane in 5 makes it through the borders, the profits justify the risks.

That was my point.
28 posted on 04/15/2004 8:55:38 AM PDT by Hodar (With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
it didn't work in the Roaring 40's

Roaring '40s?

29 posted on 04/15/2004 9:00:07 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
However, the REASON "Mixers" came into existance was because of the increased PROFIT

Right. If it tastes better, more people will buy it!

30 posted on 04/15/2004 9:02:19 AM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: laotzu
I was not referring to you. I was referring to the inane remark by the Drug Warriors about a doubling of emergency room visits attributed to marijuana.
31 posted on 04/15/2004 9:03:05 AM PDT by eno_ (Freedom Lite - it's almost worth defending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: gawd
You just can't buy advertising this good. Especially if your business is clandestine.

This federal fool has just increased the premium that people will pay for Canadian (or "Canadian") pot.

32 posted on 04/15/2004 9:03:18 AM PDT by DWPittelli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
That was my point.

Your point is that now that prohibition is over, I don't have to mix coke with Bicardi?

33 posted on 04/15/2004 9:04:23 AM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: eno_
was referring to the inane remark by the Drug Warriors about a doubling of emergency room visits attributed to marijuana.

You have other figures?

34 posted on 04/15/2004 9:05:24 AM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: eno_
Sorry that I misunderstood you.
35 posted on 04/15/2004 9:08:17 AM PDT by laotzu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
Go ahead, tell us all about the horrors of marijuana overdose. I'm sure they're piling up the corpses even as we speak. We need a laugh. Go on, please.
36 posted on 04/15/2004 9:09:30 AM PDT by eno_ (Freedom Lite - it's almost worth defending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: gawd
Today's pot is on average seven times more potent "than the marijuana baby-boomer parents may remember from their days of use or experimentation", he told reporters.

I get so tired of this lie.

I have friends who smoked then, and still do now. This ridiculous contention is just WOsD propaganda. The objective is to convince those who know for a fact that the "devil weed" propaganda of the '60s was BS would be wrong in thinking it BS now.

But it is - complete and utter bull corn.

37 posted on 04/15/2004 9:14:45 AM PDT by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
No, my point is that the liquor business owe's it's existance today to US prohibition era.

If not for prohibition, Everclear and many grain alcohols would either have never been invented, or would never have enjoyed the prominence they enjoy today. At the turn of the century, whiskey used to be considered the foul beverage of a derelict and drunk. Now, it's considered a 'high' class beverage. Single Malt whiskey is considered to be a 'social statement'.

The Liquor industry was created for the sole purpose of maximizing the "bootlegger's" profits. Smuggle in a case of beer, and 24 people get a drink. Smuggle in a case of Whiskey, and a whole lot more people get a drink. By condensing the product, profits soared. Contrast this to smuggling in a truck full of 50 gallon barrels of beer. Which had the better risk:profit ratio?

Same thing with the war on drugs. Drugs exist today that did not exist ever before. The reason is that the drug cartels are developing ways to concentrate drugs, so less does more. Once these drugs are unleashed on society, they will be around forever. Thus, the war on drugs is not only ineffective; it is creating an even wider variety of addictive and damaging drugs. It is only going to get worse.
38 posted on 04/15/2004 9:18:49 AM PDT by Hodar (With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
It is only going to get worse.

You're obviously speaking as a disinterested observer - for the Drug Lords and their goobermental allies, the future's so bright, they gotta wear shades!

39 posted on 04/15/2004 9:28:34 AM PDT by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
If not for prohibition, Everclear and many grain alcohols

Which tasted awful and thus mixers were popularized to make them taste good.

40 posted on 04/15/2004 9:38:14 AM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 561-578 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson