Skip to comments.
Canada 'sells US high-grade pot'
BBC ^
| Apr 15th 2004
| BBC
Posted on 04/15/2004 7:33:31 AM PDT by gawd
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 561-578 next last
To: eno_
Interesting. You call a remark inane and I ask if you have other figures. Your response? Non-responsive.
41
posted on
04/15/2004 9:40:16 AM PDT
by
cinFLA
To: headsonpikes
You're obviously speaking as a disinterested observer -Yeah, that's partially true. I have no intention of using drugs, without regard to the legal availability. If some idiot wants to poisen and eventually kill himself with drugs; I don't really care. Free will, and all that.
However, when this idiot's "poison of choice" becomes so expensive (due to the war on drugs) that he feels he has to rob/kill me in order to finance his suicidal tendencies; I am no longer disinterested.
42
posted on
04/15/2004 9:42:20 AM PDT
by
Hodar
(With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
To: cinFLA
It's entirely responsive. I'd like to know what a marijuana ER case looks like. Another posted already pointed out that the protocol is a Big Grab of chips and a large Vanilla Coke.
Marijuana is less toxic than what you ate for lunch, and it is non-addictive. Any medical professional caught "treating" marijuana use as a medical issue ought to lose their license as much as someone treating baldness with quack cures.
43
posted on
04/15/2004 9:44:18 AM PDT
by
eno_
(Freedom Lite - it's almost worth defending)
To: Hodar
You're only a citizen and taxpayer - you can be replaced.
Insane policies, however, are sacred - not to be tampered with!
44
posted on
04/15/2004 9:45:59 AM PDT
by
headsonpikes
(Spirit of '76 bttt!)
To: eno_
Non-responsive. I asked if you had other figures. If you don't, a simple no will suffice.
45
posted on
04/15/2004 9:49:35 AM PDT
by
cinFLA
To: Hodar
However, when this idiot's "poison of choice" becomes so expensive (due to the war on drugs) that he feels he has to rob/kill me in order to finance his suicidal tendencies; I am no longer disinterested. Do you propose providing drugs to them free of charge?
46
posted on
04/15/2004 9:50:42 AM PDT
by
cinFLA
To: gawd
"high-potency marijuana"
Then, would this be considered 'pharmaceutical grade' weed? ;)
(I suppose not since the FDA would have to approve it. LOL!)
47
posted on
04/15/2004 9:52:10 AM PDT
by
BossLady
(Your biography becomes your biology.......)
To: gawd
Mr Walters added: "Canada is exporting to us the crack of marijuana and it is a dangerous problem." Main Entry: hy·per·bo·le
Pronunciation: hI-'p&r-b&-(")lE
Function: noun
Etymology: Latin, from Greek hyperbolE excess, hyperbole, hyperbola, from hyperballein to exceed, from hyper- + ballein to throw -- more at DEVIL
: extravagant exaggeration (as "mile-high ice-cream cones")
- hy·per·bo·list /-list/ noun
48
posted on
04/15/2004 9:53:13 AM PDT
by
spodefly
(I've decided not to include a tagline with this post.)
To: cinFLA
Let's start with your facts:
What does a marijuana ER case look like?
Can you get a reputable doctor to say "I treat marijuana overdose?"
You are a laughingstock. There is no such thing as a marijuana overdose. That's why I'm asking for YOUR numbers. They are inherently fraudulent, and the people compiling them are inherently liars - as if they were touting ER vists for baldness as a crisis. What are their numbers, and who are they?
49
posted on
04/15/2004 9:53:44 AM PDT
by
eno_
(Freedom Lite - it's almost worth defending)
To: eno_
Non-responsive. A simple no will suffice if you have no other numbers.
50
posted on
04/15/2004 9:56:13 AM PDT
by
cinFLA
To: cinFLA
Do you propose providing drugs to them free of charge? No, absolutely not. I wouldn't propose giving shots of whiskey or tequilla away free of charge either. However, if drugs were treated like alcohol; I wouldn't have a problem with that. DUI should be 10x harsher, IMHO. Whether you are driving under the influence of 8 beers, 4 joints, 2 lines of cocaine; in any case you are a hazard to those on the road, and should pay the penalty for doing so.
Prohibition has never, ever worked. All it does is provide money to the underworld, finance development of more contraband, refine and condence the active ingredient of the contraband; and make the contraband more 'desireable'.
Think of it like beer in High School. If you were 16 and you had a beer; that was fun! You were doing something you weren't supposed to be doing, and it was exciting. But when you turn 21; having that same beer is now commonplace. The excitement is gone.
51
posted on
04/15/2004 10:05:46 AM PDT
by
Hodar
(With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
To: cinFLA
Do you propose providing drugs to them free of charge? No, absolutely not. I wouldn't propose giving shots of whiskey or tequilla away free of charge either. However, if drugs were treated like alcohol; I wouldn't have a problem with that. DUI should be 10x harsher, IMHO. Whether you are driving under the influence of 8 beers, 4 joints, 2 lines of cocaine; in any case you are a hazard to those on the road, and should pay the penalty for doing so.
Prohibition has never, ever worked. All it does is provide money to the underworld, finance development of more contraband, refine and condence the active ingredient of the contraband; and make the contraband more 'desireable'.
Think of it like beer in High School. If you were 16 and you had a beer; that was fun! You were doing something you weren't supposed to be doing, and it was exciting. But when you turn 21; having that same beer is now commonplace. The excitement is gone.
52
posted on
04/15/2004 10:05:46 AM PDT
by
Hodar
(With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
To: eno_
That's why I'm asking for YOUR numbers. They are inherently fraudulent, Since I have posted no numbers (obvious since you are asking for my numbers) how can you claim thay are fraudulent?
53
posted on
04/15/2004 10:07:22 AM PDT
by
cinFLA
To: cinFLA
...how can you claim they are fraudulent?,Any and all statements, numerical or otherwise, issued by you, are inherently fraudulent.
I believe that is the sense of the assembly.
54
posted on
04/15/2004 10:11:56 AM PDT
by
headsonpikes
(Spirit of '76 bttt!)
To: Hodar
Think of it like beer in High School. If you were 16 and you had a beer; that was fun! You were doing something you weren't supposed to be doing, and it was exciting. But when you turn 21; having that same beer is now commonplace. The excitement is gone. I remember one of my most exciting nights - the night I turned 21! You lose.
55
posted on
04/15/2004 10:12:28 AM PDT
by
cinFLA
To: cinFLA
...how can you claim thay are fraudulent? Because the corrrect number for marijuana "overdose" is zero, just like life-threatening baldness cases.
So, please, let's have the horror stories of how tragic teenaged are strapped to gurneys, writhing in agony because the 7-11 didn't have Double Stuff Oreos. I want to see the concerned pronouncements from ER physicians about how the "crack of marijuana" is such a scourge.
If a doctor tried to treat you for sardine addiction, would you call him a quack? How many quacks are being paid by the government to "treat" marijuana addiction?
56
posted on
04/15/2004 10:13:07 AM PDT
by
eno_
(Freedom Lite - it's almost worth defending)
To: cinFLA
I'll field this one.
The Drug Awareness Warning Network Annual Report, published by the US federal government contains a statistical compilation of all drug deaths which occur in the United States. According to this report, there has never been a death recorded from the use of marijuana by natural causes. Unlike opiates, barbiturates or amphetamines, there seems to be little risk from the use of large amounts of marijuana. When a person smokes too much they feel very tired and lie down. When people swallow large amounts of hashish, occasionally they get sick to their stomach.
Source
57
posted on
04/15/2004 10:14:49 AM PDT
by
Hodar
(With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
To: cinFLA
I remember one of my most exciting nights - the night I turned 21! You lose. Let's have some intellectual honesty now. Can you HONESTLY say that having a beer today, is as exciting as sneaking a beer when you were underage?
58
posted on
04/15/2004 10:16:48 AM PDT
by
Hodar
(With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
To: eno_
Non-responsive. Since the stated data does not mention 'over-does' you use of that term is non-responsive.
59
posted on
04/15/2004 10:17:43 AM PDT
by
cinFLA
To: Hodar
Let's have some intellectual honesty now. Can you HONESTLY say that having a beer today, is as exciting as sneaking a beer when you were underage? Let's have some intellectual honesty now. Can you HONESTLY say that having sex with your wife now is as exciting as it was with your first time when y ou were underage?
60
posted on
04/15/2004 10:19:30 AM PDT
by
cinFLA
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 561-578 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson