Skip to comments.
& These Clowns Want Mansoor Ijaz To Tesify PRIVATELY!!
NewsMax ^
| 4/15/04
| Carl Limbacher
Posted on 04/15/2004 11:50:41 AM PDT by pookie18
9/11 Panel Outs CIA Spymaster
Raising further questions about whether it's doing more harm than good, the commission probing the Sept. 11 attacks has revealed the identity of the CIA's top spymaster, a position considered so sensitive that in the entire history of the agency the anonymity of the person who holds it has never before been breached.
Called to testify on Wednesday, James L. Pavitt, head of the CIA clandestine operations unit, told the panel, "I am not a public person."
In a story headlined "Clandestine, Or at Least He Was Until Yesterday," the New York Times noted that the decision to out Pavitt by having him testify in public was so extraordinary that even some panel members expressed reluctance about the move.
"My stomach's been turning as Mr. Pavitt's been answering questions here this afternoon," 9/11 commissioner former Sen. Bob Kerrey said.
Kerrey urged the White House to issue a legal opinion saying that Pavitt's appearance did not set a precedent, the Times said.
Asked if being outed by the 9/11 panel made him uncomfortable, Pavitt answered cryptically, "Yes and no ... no one in my position has ever testified publicly."
TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004election; 2004electionbias; 911commission; antiamericanism; antigovernment; bobnovak; cia; coverblown; covertactions; doublestandard; election2004; espionage; hypocrisy; hypocrites; joewilson; mediabias; medialiesbyommission; precedent; secretagentman; testimony; topsecret; traitors; treason; unamerican; undercoveragent; usefulidiots; valerieplume
1
posted on
04/15/2004 11:50:42 AM PDT
by
pookie18
To: pookie18
Now, exactly who is responsible for us having a poor intelegence function?
2
posted on
04/15/2004 11:56:42 AM PDT
by
kimoajax
To: pookie18
in the entire history of the agency the anonymity of the person who holds it has never before been breached. Kerrey urged the White House to issue a legal opinion saying that Pavitt's appearance did not set a precedent, the Times said.
I guess it depends on the meaning of the word "precedent".
Seriously, the Dems are just openly hateful of America. They want to weaken our security. They want us to lose the War against Terrorism. They want many soldiers killed. They want many grieving families for the media to interview. They want our economy to hit rock bottom. Everything they want is bad for this country.
3
posted on
04/15/2004 11:57:04 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(You can see it coming like a train on a track.)
To: pookie18
Where's outrage ? calling Joe Wilson.....calling Joe Wilson !
4
posted on
04/15/2004 11:57:54 AM PDT
by
stylin19a
(is it mogadishu yet ?)
To: pookie18
Where does one begin when detailing the incompetence of this 9/11 commission? Between their defense of Gorelick's conflict of interest position, their personal political ambitions and their media grandstanding, it's hard to choose.
To: pookie18
And there's a Grand Jury convened to find out who exposed Joe Wilson's wife's connection to the CIA? Hell, her name wasn't even used in that case. This breach is far worse than what the Grand Jury's been dealing with.
6
posted on
04/15/2004 12:04:07 PM PDT
by
mass55th
To: kimoajax
7
posted on
04/15/2004 12:07:01 PM PDT
by
ALOHA RONNIE
(Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.LZXRAY.com)
To: pookie18
Who did Ben-Veniste "out" when he told the entire world a CIA "she" created the August 6 PDB?
8
posted on
04/15/2004 12:21:39 PM PDT
by
mabelkitty
(John Kerry is the sad clown of life.)
To: stylin19a
My thoughts exactly.
9
posted on
04/15/2004 12:22:51 PM PDT
by
Condor51
("Diplomacy without arms is like music without instruments." -- Frederick the Great)
To: stylin19a
This SERIOUSLY is not within the scope of the 9/11 commission to "out" an undercover agent. This agent sounds far more critical to our national security then Joe Wilson's wife...
10
posted on
04/15/2004 12:24:01 PM PDT
by
tioga
To: stylin19a
There is no outrage when it comes to the liberal double standard the press gives us every day.
11
posted on
04/15/2004 12:25:30 PM PDT
by
weegee
(Maybe Urban Outfitters should sell t-shirts that say "Voting Democrat is for Old Dead People.")
To: weegee
The guy should have downright refused to testify publicly.
12
posted on
04/15/2004 12:26:44 PM PDT
by
Peach
To: pookie18
The demoncRAT members don't want to publicly acknowledge the clintoonian admin is to blame for 911.
13
posted on
04/15/2004 12:27:13 PM PDT
by
lilylangtree
(Veni, Vidi, Vici)
To: pookie18
"My stomach's been turning as Mr. Pavitt's been answering questions here this afternoon," 9/11 commissioner former Sen. Bob Kerrey said. My stomach turns Bob whenever I think of how you could have been.
14
posted on
04/15/2004 12:29:37 PM PDT
by
wardaddy
(This is it. We either win and prevail or we lose and get tossed into that dustbin W mentioned!)
To: ClearCase_guy
Bump for emphasis. Also, the dems would rather rule in hell than serve in heaven. If they cannot rule America,they would rather destroy her.
15
posted on
04/15/2004 12:34:58 PM PDT
by
Truth29
To: pookie18
My first reaction is "unbelievable", then I remember who I'm talking about.
16
posted on
04/15/2004 12:35:45 PM PDT
by
FourPeas
To: pookie18
Atrocious. People won't care until we're burying 10x the number that died in 9/11.
I'm half expecting Mansoor Ijaz' long lost brother from "the old country" to show up if he testifies in public... (Godfather bump)
To: pookie18
"'My stomach's been turning as Mr. Pavitt's been answering questions here this afternoon,' 9/11 commissioner former Sen. Bob Kerrey said."Mine's been turning since I saw how low Kerrey and the rest of the Democrat partisan hacks would sink in their ruthless grab for power and political advantage.
Make public the identity of the head of the CIA clandestine operations unit?
Compromise U.S. national security?
Force National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice to endanger national security by testifying before their self-serving "commission"?
Of course. Nothing is more important to these moral cretins than disparaging President Bush and grabbing some kind of political advantage.
18
posted on
04/15/2004 12:43:41 PM PDT
by
Savage Beast
(My parents, grandparents, and great grandparents were Democrats. My children are Republicans.)
To: pookie18
James L. Pavitt, head of the CIA clandestine operations unit, is outed by public testimony; whereas, Mansoor Ijaz, who worked as a contractor with the Clinton White House, and who WANTS to testify in public, must testify in private.
Go figure!
19
posted on
04/15/2004 12:43:56 PM PDT
by
TomGuy
(Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
To: pookie18
Kerrey's like a buzzard gobbling down roadkill and protesting that it turns his stomach.
20
posted on
04/15/2004 12:47:46 PM PDT
by
Savage Beast
(My parents, grandparents, and great grandparents were Democrats. My children are Republicans.)
To: kimoajax
FRICKIN INCREDIBLE!!!! BUMP. PAGING DAN RATHER, MR. DAN RAITHER . . . . will you carry THIS story on the CBS Evening news since it comes from the NY TIMES????????????
To: BlessedByLiberty
It's breathtaking. Our government is becoming more and more illegitimate with each passing day. The judiciary is broken, the legislature is a circus, and the executive branch risks being occupied by a traitor.
I pray for our future.
To: TomGuy
Go figure! What's to figure? They can't grandstand against Bush with Ijaz, and they are afraid he will tell the truth that might make them look bad. They have zero concern for anything but their own political careers. Three thousand dead Americans is nothing but a bloody shirt for them to wave while denouncing Bush.
23
posted on
04/15/2004 12:54:31 PM PDT
by
hopespringseternal
(People should be banned for sophistry.)
To: pookie18
To be fair, Mr. Pavitt was "outed" in Woodward's book Bush At War I believe. Not saying it's okay, but the identity of the DDO is pretty well known.
To: ClearCase_guy
And rewrite the Constitution or, failing that, render it a dead letter.
To: pookie18
And where is wilson demanding the commission should resign for "outing" this spymaster? Hiding behind valeries skirt i would say.
26
posted on
04/15/2004 1:01:27 PM PDT
by
freeangel
(freeangel)
To: kimoajax
Not to badger anybody for this, but the title of NewsMax article is not
"& These Clowns Want Mansoor Ijaz To Testify PRIVATELY."I know it's being picky, but using this title makes it ripe for a duplicate post.
As for the content, I think this commission is a complete joke. Thanks for posting it. :)
27
posted on
04/15/2004 1:19:30 PM PDT
by
GOPyouth
(De Oppresso Liber! The Tyrant is captured!)
To: Zack Nguyen
Is the book out yet?
28
posted on
04/15/2004 1:39:15 PM PDT
by
pookie18
To: pookie18
To: pookie18
Yes, it was out last year.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson