Skip to comments.
World set back 10 years by Bush's new world order, says Blair aide
The Guardian ^
| 4/14/04
| Paul Brown
Posted on 04/15/2004 1:58:21 PM PDT by LibWhacker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 last
To: John Lenin
Lol . . . I LOVE that picture!
To: Southack
Yeah, I wondered about that, too . . . Positively Orwellian.
To: LibWhacker
me too ... I just dont want people to underestimate how bad Hillary would be (10X worse than her hubby iMHO).
43
posted on
04/15/2004 2:29:37 PM PDT
by
WOSG
(http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com - I salute our brave fallen.)
To: E=MC<sup>2</sup>
And this is a bad thing how??? And I thought 10 years is that it? I was thinking it should be at least a 20 year setback.
To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
Beautiful analogy!
To: Peach
Pukehead Brit bureaucrat:
We were thisclose to getting America to give it all away before this dang Bush came along.
46
posted on
04/15/2004 2:31:58 PM PDT
by
Spotsy
(Bush-Cheney '04)
To: WOSG
It'd be nightmarish! Our poor great-grandkids would be dealing with President-For-Life Chelsea Ceaucescu Clinton.
To: LibWhacker
World set back 10 years; read 'left-wing agenda'
GOOD.
48
posted on
04/15/2004 2:34:37 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Kerry' s a Veteran, but so were Lee Harvey Oswald, Timothy McVeigh and Benedict Arnold)
To: LibWhacker
What would the 'environmental impact' from a nuke set off by some crazed jihadi be?
This twit couldn't pour water out of a boot with instructions on the heel.
49
posted on
04/15/2004 2:39:28 PM PDT
by
reagan_fanatic
(So you're a feminist - isn't that cute!)
To: farmfriend
ping
To: telebob
Yes because poverty living naked in the woods is sustainable.
51
posted on
04/15/2004 2:48:48 PM PDT
by
Sender
(Support Free Republic...become a monthly donor!)
To: LibWhacker
Thw world set back ten years could be a compliment because we had no bombings in the USA ten years ago.
52
posted on
04/15/2004 4:00:09 PM PDT
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: LibWhacker
This is similar to hillary whining about 'Bush undoing clinton's legacy'.
To: LibWhacker
"the death of socialism" I hope we'll see it. But sometimes I think we're already socialist, and it's only the last of the momentum of our tradition of freedoms that makes us think we're still very free.
54
posted on
04/15/2004 5:44:06 PM PDT
by
Sam Cree
(Democrats are herd animals)
To: LibWhacker
This is good. 1994 was a good year for me. Now if only Bush could take me back to 1983, I'd be really happy. Now where's did I put my Men At Work album?
55
posted on
04/15/2004 5:45:53 PM PDT
by
SamAdams76
(I'm voting for John Kerry until I vote against him in November)
To: LibWhacker
World of Socialism set back 10 years by Bush's new world order, says Blair aide Hip, hip hooray!
56
posted on
04/15/2004 5:46:01 PM PDT
by
jwalsh07
(REMEMBER FABRIZIO!)
To: LibWhacker
I only wish it had been pushed back 50 years...moms stay home with kids...father earns the "bacon"...Queers stayed in closet...etc...etc...
57
posted on
04/15/2004 5:50:13 PM PDT
by
Hotdog
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson