Skip to comments.
Clerk's gun trumps knife in robbery try
Lowell Sun Online ^
| April 15, 2004
| n/a
Posted on 04/15/2004 3:56:56 PM PDT by Gun142
Clerk's gun trumps knife in robbery try
WILMINGTON A knife-wielding robber fled empty handed but unharmed after his victim pulled a gun on him Sunday night, according to police.
The unidentified man went into Forest Service Center at 316 Lowell St. about 8:15 p.m. asking for change to use in a vending machine, Police Chief Bernard P. Nally said.
The clerk left the office to tend to a customer and when he returned the man asked for more change.
"After the attendant made change the second time the suspect produced a knife and pointed it at the attendant and said, 'Don't do anything stupid and give me all the money,'" Nally said. "About this time the attendant produced a handgun which he is lawfully licensed to do and ordered the suspect to leave the store, which he did."
The robber was described as a white man about 5-feet 6-inches tall in his early 20s with a thin build, and clear complexion, wearing a mustard-colored sweatshirt and dark sweatpants.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: bang; banglist; selfdefense
Some anti-gun retards don't believe this is a defensive use of a firearm. Their statistics\studies often only include data where the perp was killed, not wounded or just shot at, killed.
What stopped this guy with the knife? Could it be a ***?
1
posted on
04/15/2004 3:57:03 PM PDT
by
Gun142
To: *bang_list
.
2
posted on
04/15/2004 3:57:28 PM PDT
by
Gun142
(Where Will You Be When You Get Where You're Going? -- Jerry Clower)
To: Gun142
robber fled empty handed but unharmed What a relief! I was so worried that some harm might have come to that scumbag..........NOT!!!
3
posted on
04/15/2004 4:00:41 PM PDT
by
Krodg
To: Gun142
Heck, the anti-gunners will scream for this mans arrest.
4
posted on
04/15/2004 4:01:09 PM PDT
by
Guillermo
(Your own personal Konservative Klick Guerilla)
To: Gun142
"About this time the attendant produced a handgun which he is lawfully licensed to do and ordered the suspect to leave the store, which he did." The clerk should have either killed him or held him for the police.....an armed robber is loose
and since he got away...will most likely be more carefull in plotting his next violent crime...
and better armed...
imo
5
posted on
04/15/2004 4:03:30 PM PDT
by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: Gun142
I'm not going to quote The Untouchables. I won't do it.
6
posted on
04/15/2004 4:11:48 PM PDT
by
Tredge
To: joesnuffy
since he got away...will most likely be more carefull in plotting his next violent crime...
He'll either go on wondering just who has a gun and fear the good guy or stick to the stores with a "No Concealed Carry" sign in the window.
7
posted on
04/15/2004 4:15:52 PM PDT
by
Gun142
(Where Will You Be When You Get Where You're Going? -- Jerry Clower)
To: Gun142
Paper, scissors, rock, Gun. Hey, no fair!
8
posted on
04/15/2004 5:02:34 PM PDT
by
fuquadukie
(If you can't hang with the Big Dogs... don't jump off the porch.)
To: Gun142
Correction: "The robber was described as a white man about 5-feet 6-inches tall in his early 20s with a thin build, and clear complexion, wearing a mustard-colored sweatshirt and dark stained sweatpants.
9
posted on
04/15/2004 6:15:13 PM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(Leave Pat Leave!)
To: Gun142
Never just bring a knife to a gunfight....
10
posted on
04/15/2004 6:18:19 PM PDT
by
Smokin' Joe
(C'est la guerre.)
To: joesnuffy
I have to agree with you. In effect, he ordered the criminal to get away.
I would love to find a (non-firearm related) law to charge him with as a lesson. Aiding & abetting?
Afraid though that "terminal stupidity" is all that actually covers it.
11
posted on
04/15/2004 6:27:39 PM PDT
by
ApplegateRanch
(The world needs more horses, and fewer Jackasses!)
To: joesnuffy
The clerk should have either killed him or held him for the police..... The clerk had no legal right to kill the robber, nor did he have any legal authority to stop him from getting away. One the robber dropped the knife, he ceased being an apparent threat. Had the clerk tried to hold the robber for police, any of several scenarios could have emerged:
- Robber could have just turned around and strolled out the door, secure in the knowledge that (especially if there were surveillance cameras) the clerk wasn't going to shoot him in the back.
- Robber could have turned around and bolted for the door, perhaps aware or perhaps not that the clerk couldn't legally shoot him; robber could have been very mad at clerk and thus decided to seek out revenge.
- Robber could have waited until he thought the clerk was momentarily distracted, and then decided to try for the clerk's gun.
- Robber could have been dumb and placid enough to wait for the police, who arrest him without incident.
- Robber could have waited placidly for police, who then mistake the armed person for a robber and shoot him.
Scenarios 1 and 2 produce the same result as what actually happened; scenario 3 could end up with a dead robber or a dead clerk. Scenario 4 would probably be nice, if it happened, but in some areas scenario 5 would be a real risk.
12
posted on
04/17/2004 1:25:47 PM PDT
by
supercat
(Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson