Skip to comments.
Senators Call on Gorelick to Testify
The Guardian ^
| April 22, 2004
| Libby Quaid
Posted on 04/22/2004 4:24:44 PM PDT by EllaMinnow
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 next last
To: Lancey Howard
"So these idiots are supporting her "advocacy" of fighting terrorism with "harsher sentences"."
. . .it is beyond hopeless. Bush knew it would be a 'gotcha'; and the Dems crow how he did not want this; well NO ONE worth salt would want this; and in that regard; probably good this has imploded.
In the meantime, how is it; that Hillary's personal 'terrorists-for-votes' prisoner release program gets not even a blink/wink/nada when these media mouths cluck their tongues on how Clinton, Inc. dealt with terrorism.
No; not specifically i.d. as AlQueda, but we know a terrorist is a terrorist is a terrorist. And so do they.
Wonder what Jamie thought about that. . .
61
posted on
04/22/2004 6:35:00 PM PDT
by
cricket
(Terrorists are weapons of mass destruction. . .)
To: Wolfstar
BUMP for a truly sensible assessment of what has, and should, take place (#24).
To: redlipstick
Jumpin Gee Hosiphat!!! You mean to tell me there are 11 whole senators in Whitewashington DC with testicles?! Just when I was about to give up on the world.
63
posted on
04/22/2004 6:42:54 PM PDT
by
mercy
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
TRENT LOTT ?!?!
64
posted on
04/22/2004 6:43:56 PM PDT
by
mercy
To: cricket
I don't care if Gorelick testifies. I just want it over.
At this sorry point, it wouldn't matter if Gorelick did testify. Can you imagine the platitudes and softballs that her fellow commissioners would toss her way? It would be such a pathetic show of whitewashing and lame excuse-making that it would have me heaving within minutes.
"First I would like to say, Ms. Gorelick, that it has been an absolute pleasure working with you these many months. Your tireless work, your dedication, your enthusiasm, and your invaluable contributions to the efforts of this commission blah blah blah friggin' blah...."
The credibility of the commissiion is hopelessly shot. I would prefer the stinking commission simply wrap it up and go home. Whatever report they finally release won't be worth the paper it's written on.
What's that smell?
65
posted on
04/22/2004 6:48:53 PM PDT
by
Lancey Howard
(....the smell of whitewash.)
To: Enterprise
The Senators are applauding someone who participated in the failure to protect our country, and praising her while she participates in covering up her role, and while she unfairly tries to blame others for her stupidity.Bump that! Well said.
To: nicmarlo
You mean like........."I did not have *** relations with that woman." That kind of "under oath?" : ) I think you have to put democrats under a different kind of oath. I call it the "your testifying today but were calling your ass back in next week so you better be telling the truth oath".
67
posted on
04/22/2004 6:51:03 PM PDT
by
pepperhead
(Kennedy's floats, Mary Jo's don't!)
To: bitt
Just sent Rep. Kingston an email - he needs to know we appreciate his speaking out.
68
posted on
04/22/2004 6:56:13 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
To: redlipstick
Kean, a Republican, has rejected calls for Gorelick to step aside. He said she is one of the hardest working panel members... Hard working?
I can see why. Covering up for herself and her Billyboy hero must be very hard work.
69
posted on
04/22/2004 6:56:35 PM PDT
by
EternalHope
(Boycott everything French forever. Including their vassal nations.)
To: mercy
TRENT LOTT ?!?! Must not be up for reelection this year.
70
posted on
04/22/2004 6:57:50 PM PDT
by
pepperhead
(Kennedy's floats, Mary Jo's don't!)
To: No Truce With Kings
Kean asked her if she would consider resigning. How stupid is that ..?? Of course she's going to say no. She's been promised the AG spot if she manages to smear Bush.
71
posted on
04/22/2004 7:01:33 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
To: redlipstick
I believe ALL "public" testimony is under oath. Only the private conversations - like those with the President/VP are off the record.
72
posted on
04/22/2004 7:03:01 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
To: Wolfstar
This commission was never intended to be non-partisan; ever.
This commission was intended to be a "we got Bush" - prelude to "we have to impeach Bush".
It has backfired - bigtime, because the dims still fail to recognize 9/11 changed everything - everything except them.
73
posted on
04/22/2004 7:06:33 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
To: cyncooper
"going after Gorelick was going to "backfire" on the GOP"
This is "projection technique" for the real problem - this HAS ALREADY BACKFIRED BIG TIME ON THE DIMS!!
74
posted on
04/22/2004 7:08:35 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
To: fedupwithlibs
Don't feel that way - remember - your letter represents THOUSANDS of people; that's how demographics work.
75
posted on
04/22/2004 7:14:29 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
To: Lancey Howard
"pathetic show of whitewashing and lame excuse-making"
While I agree with your assumptions, please remember she would be "under oath" - just like Clarke was - and he's now totally discredited.
76
posted on
04/22/2004 7:20:20 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
To: CyberAnt
"Under oath" means nothing to Democrats.
To: Lancey Howard
Hmmmm? That's what Clinton thought!
78
posted on
04/22/2004 7:32:40 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
(The 2004 Election is for the SOUL of AMERICA)
To: randog
Of course she's one of the hardest working members of the commission--it's a tough job burying all those Clinton admin skeletons.LOL
To: redlipstick
It is our firm belief that any committee report or recommendations will be incomplete without public testimony by Ms. Gorelick...Jamie Gorelick = the missing link
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson