Skip to comments.AN open letter to my colleagues in the news business. The silence is getting loud.
Posted on 04/24/2004 9:56:59 PM PDT by Pikamax
AN open letter to my colleagues in the news business. The silence is getting loud.
It's been nearly four months since the scandal broke. Four months since Jack Kelley, star foreign correspondent for USA Today, was found to have lied his way through his professional life for the last 13 years. He lied about where he had been, what he had seen, whom he had talked to, what they had said. He lied so much I'm only half convinced "Jack Kelley' is his real name.
Yet you, my colleagues, have not asked the most important question:
What does this mean for the future of white journalism?
Granted, you've pontificated about our damaged credibility. You've felled forests with your weighty ruminations about what this portends for the future of our profession. But, evidently cowed by political correctness, you've ignored the most vital issues.
Did USA Today advance a moderately capable journalist because he was white? Did some white editor mentor him out of racial solidarity even though Kelley was unqualified? In light of this fiasco, should we re- examine the de facto affirmative action that gives white men preferential treatment in our newsrooms?
Certainly, no one had to beg for these questions to be asked a year ago, when Jayson Blair got his sorry backside in hot water. Blair, as you hardly need to be reminded, was a black reporter who initially came to the New York Times via a slot in an internship program the paper was using to increase newsroom diversity. It turned out that the only diversity Blair represented was that which is to be found between lies and damned lies.
Still, some observers felt the circumstances of his hiring were almost as important as the reason for his firing. Columnist Andrew Sullivan claimed Blair got away with snookering the Times because his editors feared offending a black journalist.
Columnist Richard Cohen told us Blair enjoyed "favoritism based on race.'
Jennifer Harper, a reporter for the conservative Washington Times, wrote that the Blair episode made the New York paper a "case study on the effects of affirmative action in the newsroom.'
A computer search Friday indicates that Sullivan, Cohen and Harper have thus far been silent on the racial dimensions of the Kelley incident. In fairness to those worthies, I'm sure they're warming up their laptops even as we speak.
While we await the results, let me, in the interest of full disclosure, admit that I didn't think up today's column on my own. Rather, it was inspired by remarks Gwen Ifill of PBS made last week at an awards dinner. Truth to tell, though, she only crystallized what I and, I daresay, many other journalists of color have been thinking ever since Kelley's deceptions were uncovered.
Namely, that this is (with apologies to the Four Tops) the same old song. When a white person screws up, it ignites a debate on the screw up. When a black person screws up, it ignites a debate on race.
So, loathe though I am to position myself as a spokesman, I feel confident in saying one thing on behalf of black journalists everywhere: When and if our industry decides to deal with the issues raised by Kelley's transgressions, we stand ready to help. Need someone to handle outreach to journalism programs at HWCUs (historically white colleges and universities)? Want to discuss whether hiring whites requires us to lower our standards? Looking for ideas of how to make whites feel more welcome?
We're standing by. All you have to do is call.
Because doggone it, white journalism has a long, proud history Edward R. Murrow, Mike Royko ... Matt Drudge. We cannot allow one bad apple to sully that.
So I'll be over here waiting for the discussion of these issues to begin. I'm thinking I should pack a lunch.
-- Leonard Pitts is a columnist for the Miami Herald, 1 Herald Plaza, Miami, Fla., 33132. Readers may contact him via e-mail at email@example.com .
Why focus on skin color? Look at liberal political positions.
The left takes care of their own.
Wrong and wrong. The debate should be on journalistic ethics, something not learned in college classes taught by unabashed liberals who believe that the end justifies the means as long as it advances their goal, unattainable though it may be, of a one-world classless society.
Could have fooled me, Leonard Pitts. I wasn't aware of Jayson Blair's race until you brought it up (though it's relevance to the issue still remains a mystery).
Perhaps there is something in what Mr. Pitts says. Certainly Blair got where he was because of his race, but the big story is that the Left will say what ever it takes to advance "The Movement". If the facts don't quite work out, the left will make up facts.
Two can google this game. Mr. Pitts. Here's some more of your feeeeeelings.
After acknowledging that rap "has been repeatedly stained with the blood of performers and hangers-on, of which the murders of Tupac Shakur and Christopher 'The Notorious B.I.G'" Mr. Pitts asks, "Given all that, should you and I be troubled that police are spying on these guys?"
He responds to his own question. "Yeah, I think we should" and continues.
"The problem is that police aren't surveilling people they suspect of committing crimes or even people they suspect will commit crimes. Rather, they are surveilling an entire class.
And how convenient that the vast majority of people in that class is young, male and black." [end excerpt]
"Surveilling an entire class," as in racial profiling. As in pulling a person over for speeding, driving while black.
He has a good point about the white press. If only he'd address both sides of igniting debate where the issue is "race," always race.
We see Doofus Franken complain about political ideology and dispute it as "fact" when he disagrees with someone's opinion. The biased left press rooms print fraudulent articles that aren't even researched and still the left denies that there is a leftist tilt in the media?
Show me the conservative voice who is making up stories. Doesn't happen even at "conservative" broadcasters/publishers.
Meanwhile CNN recently got caught using photos of NASA astronauts in coffins and claiming they were US soldiers killed in Iraq. They want the "if it bleeds, it leads" footage.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.