Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Google IPO would end long dry spell
MSNBC News Services ^ | April 27, 2004 | MSNBC

Posted on 04/27/2004 3:36:03 PM PDT by Truth666

After a long dry spell, the venture capital industry is hoping an upcoming initial public offering by Web search giant Google will help start a new flow of cash to young companies. But despite a pick-up in venture financing in the first quarter, the money now being raised bringing new companies public is just a light rain compared to the downpour of cash that flooded the market at peak of the tech boom in 2000.

Figures released Monday show that venture-backed companies took in $5 billion in investments in the first quarter, a healthy gain from the $4 billion collected in the first quarter of 2003. But investment is still down sharply from the $27 billion raised in the first quarter of 2000 at the height of the market bubble, according to a quarterly survey by Venture One/Ernst & Young.


Google, which got $25 million in venture funding from Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers and Sequoia Capital in 1999, is widely expected to announce plans for its IPO this week. One reason for the timing is a Securities & Exchange Commission regulation that requires companies with more than 500 shareholders and $10 million in assets to make a financial filing within 120 days of the year they reach that threshold.

Having awarded stock options to most of its 1,000-plus employees, Google is believed to have triggered the rule last year, giving the company until Thursday to provide details on its finances for the first time.

Google theoretically could just file an annual report for 2003 without pursuing an IPO, but most observers seem to think that strategy would make little sense. That’s because Google would encounter all the compliance headaches of a public company, incurring millions in annual expenses, without reaping any of the financial benefits.

Ironically, archrival Yahoo! is also in line for a huge windfall from Google’s IPO. Yahoo invested $10 million in Google in mid-2000, when the two companies were still friendly, acquiring a stake that figures to be worth hundreds of millions of dollars after an IPO.

Until a filing is made, investors can only speculate about the details of the offering. The company is believed to have revenues approaching $1 billion a year. The stock offering could raise as much as $2 billion for a 10 percent slice of Google, valuing the entire company at more than $20 billion. That would make its IPO one of the biggest ever by a technology company and deliver huge returns to its original investors. The lack of hard data has only boosted interest in the offering.

"I think the secretive nature of the company has actually accelerated or exaggerated that interest, that mystery about it." said Martin Pyykkonen, a senior research analyst at Janco Partners.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: google; googleipo; ipo
Can you imagine the internet without Google ? Where to find information if the only available search would be the filtered channels of Yahoo & Co ?
Google played a key role. It was a miracle that it has survived all the attempts to destruct the last free search engine in the internet.
Will it also survive this one ?
1 posted on 04/27/2004 3:36:04 PM PDT by Truth666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Truth666
away from insanity?

/finishes title
2 posted on 04/27/2004 3:37:00 PM PDT by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truth666
Can you imagine the internet without Google ? Where to find information if the only available search would be the filtered channels of Yahoo & Co ?

Someone would just invent something like google. Eventually, someone will invent something better than google.

The story says that google might be "worth" as much as 25 billion after the IPO. That's just insane.

3 posted on 04/27/2004 3:43:57 PM PDT by isthisnickcool (I'm isthisnickcool, and I approved this post!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool
It's not the technology that makes google unique, as the fact that (unlike Microsoft) it is the product of just a few individuals.
It's the fact that it does provide uncensored information.
4 posted on 04/27/2004 3:47:59 PM PDT by Truth666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: John Robinson; B Knotts; stainlessbanner; TechJunkYard; ShadowAce; Knitebane; AppyPappy; jae471; ...
The Penguin Ping.

Wanna be Penguified? Just holla!

Got root?


5 posted on 04/27/2004 3:49:51 PM PDT by rdb3 (Let others praise ancient times; I am glad I was born in these.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool
amen, brother...$25 bill is about $20 bill too much..
6 posted on 04/27/2004 3:56:32 PM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to propagate her genes.....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Truth666
Google valued at 25 billion is a hoax, similar to the hoax that TimeWarner got involved in when they accepted whatever the value of AOL was at the time that they merged. If the IPO places the market value at 25 billion, the value of Google will be headed in only one direction, south.
7 posted on 04/27/2004 4:11:36 PM PDT by Biblebelter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
You go, rdb3!
8 posted on 04/27/2004 4:15:02 PM PDT by Freemeorkillme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Truth666
Google has $1B in revenues - does a $25B IPO make sense?

Google's only claim is a clean interface with little marketing hype on their homepage. However, they have won over 80% + of www users. There is a better way to search the www - the current method is a little archaic. Someone will figure out a method to pinpoint searches and retrieve information in an organized fashion.

9 posted on 04/27/2004 5:14:37 PM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
well, the smart thing may be to short the da.n thing..

10 posted on 04/27/2004 6:07:13 PM PDT by Flavius ("... we should reconnoitre assiduosly... " Vegetius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
There is a better way to search the www

There will always be a better way, but Google is a good bet to find it before anyone else does. There's a reason they have won over 80% of web users, and it isn't a pretty interface. They have some serious rocket scientists in the back room who know as much as anyone on Earth about natural-language searching. New Ph.D.'s in the text-mining area consider Google the prestige employer in that field. It will probably stay that way for some years, until their stock options get old and tired like Yahoo's and Microsoft's are. Google is still minting millionaires, which is always a big draw.

11 posted on 04/28/2004 10:35:14 AM PDT by Nick Danger (We reserve the right to serve refuse to anyone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Truth666
Can you imagine the internet without Google ?

Without Google and Mapquest, I would be lost...

12 posted on 04/28/2004 10:38:34 AM PDT by Snowy (Microsoft: "You've got questions? We've got dancing paperclips.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
Vivisimo
13 posted on 04/29/2004 2:25:04 PM PDT by freedom9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
"There is a better way to search the www - the current method is a little archaic."

And, as you all know, you can't have archaic and eat it too.

<rimshot mode=on>

Michael

14 posted on 04/29/2004 2:33:22 PM PDT by Wright is right! (It's amazing how fun times when you're having flies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Truth666
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1126921/posts?page=1

More on the secret war to muzzle the new Internet media
15 posted on 04/29/2004 3:40:39 PM PDT by Truth666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truth666
The big search engine before Google was AltaVista. I remember when I got my computer in 1997. Altavista controlled most of the search engine market. Now there like nothing. Google totally passed them by.
16 posted on 05/03/2004 12:31:27 PM PDT by Adam36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Adam36
They did with Altavista what they tried to do with Google but haven't achieved so far.
17 posted on 05/03/2004 2:28:10 PM PDT by Truth666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool
google might be "worth" as much as 25 billion after the IPO

Totally insane. Search engines come and go. This one is nothing special.

18 posted on 05/03/2004 2:31:02 PM PDT by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Top search engines (like altavista) come and go when they become controlled.
19 posted on 05/03/2004 2:42:29 PM PDT by Truth666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Truth666

Compare this with facebook 8 years later.


20 posted on 05/22/2012 3:22:33 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson