Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

General Suggests Abuses at Iraq Jail Were Encouraged
nytimes.com ^ | May 2, 2004 | PHILIP SHENON

Posted on 05/01/2004 1:38:40 PM PDT by Destro

General Suggests Abuses at Iraq Jail Were Encouraged

By PHILIP SHENON

Published: May 2, 2004

WASHINGTON, May 1 — The Army Reserve general whose military police officers were photographed as they mistreated Iraqi prisoners said Saturday that she had been "sickened" by the pictures and had known nothing about the sexual humiliation and other abuse until weeks later.

But the officer, Brig. Gen. Janis Karpinski of the 800th Military Police Brigade, said the special high-security cellblock at the Abu Ghraib prison, west of Baghdad, where the abuses took place had been under the tight control of a separate group of military intelligence officers who had so far avoided any public blame.

In her first public comments about the brutality — which drew wide attention and condemnation after photographs documenting it were broadcast Wednesday night by CBS News — General Karpinski said that while the reservists involved were "bad people" and deserved punishment, she suspected they were acting with the encouragement, if not at the direction, of military intelligence units that ran the special cellblock used for interrogation.

Speaking in a telephone interview from her home in South Carolina, the general said military commanders in Iraq were trying to shift the blame exclusively to her and the reservists.

"We're disposable," she said of the military's attitude toward reservists. "Why would they want the active-duty people to take the blame? They want to put this on the M.P.'s and hope that this thing goes away. Well, it's not going to go away."

She said the special cellblock, known as 1A, was one of about two dozen in the large prison and was essentially off limits to soldiers who were not part of the interrogations.

She said repeatedly in the interview that she was not defending the actions of the reservists who took part in the brutality, who were part of her command. She said that when she was first presented with the photographs of the abuse in January, they "sickened me."

"I put my head down because I really thought I was going to throw up," she said. "It was awful. My immediate reaction was: These are bad people, because their faces revealed how much pleasure they felt at this."

But she said the context of the brutality had been lost, including the fact that the military police officers involved represented only a small fraction of the nearly 3,400 reservists who reported to her from 16 different prisons and similar locations around Iraq.

She said she was also alarmed that little attention has been paid to the military unit that controlled Cellblock 1A, where her soldiers guarded the Iraqi detainees between interrogations.

She said that the floor space of the two-story cellblock was only about 40 feet by 20 feet, and that military intelligence officers were in and out of the cellblock "24 hours a day."

"They were in there at 2 in the morning, they were at 4 in the afternoon," said General Karpinski, who arrived in Iraq last June and who was the only woman to hold a command in the war zone. "This was no 9-to-5 job."

The photographs of American soldiers smiling, laughing and signaling "thumbs up" as Iraqi detainees were forced into sexually humiliating positions provoked outrage just as the American military was seeking to pacify a rising insurgency and gain the trust of more Iraqis before turning over sovereignty to a new government on June 30.

General Karpinski, who has returned to South Carolina and her civilian profession as a business consultant, said she visited Abu Ghraib as often as twice a week last fall and had repeatedly instructed military police officers under her command to treat prisoners humanely and in accord with international human rights agreements.

"I can speak some Arabic," she said. "I'm not fluent, but when I went to any of my prison facilities, I would make it a point to try to talk to the detainees."

But she said she did not visit Cellblock 1A, in keeping with the wishes of military intelligence officers who, she said, worried that unnecessary visits might interfere with their interrogations of Iraqis.

She acknowledged that she "probably should have been more aggressive" about visiting the interrogation cellblock. She stressed that she had received no reports from any of her commanders of possible prisoner abuses in the cellblock.

After the first allegations of abuse circulated earlier this year, Lt. Gen. Ricardo S. Sanchez, the senior American commander in Iraq, ordered sweeping inquiries into whether any commanders — including General Karpinski — should be held responsible. He also ordered a review of policies and procedures at all of the prisons controlled by occupation forces in Iraq.

The administrative review, known in the military criminal justice system as an AR15-6, was completed March 1 by Army Maj. Gen. Antonio M. Taguba, who had assembled a team of officers trained in military detention. The report was approved by his superior, Lt. Gen. David D. McKiernan, commander of American ground forces in the Middle East, and forwarded to General Sanchez on April 4.

The finding documented the abuses illustrated by the photographs circulating this week, as well as other problems in the military's detainee system in Iraq.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iraq; iraqipow
In other words - suspected terrorist detainees were being given the third degree via psychological not physical abuse to get them to break - what went wrong is that they allowed the goobers to take snapshots (I guess intelligence was not there to supervise the goobers 24/7).

That makes sense - especially since the men were hooded - so they would not recognize their interrogators - When you see hoods on prisoners it is because they re being interrogated by intel operatives who rather not be recognized.

1 posted on 05/01/2004 1:38:40 PM PDT by Destro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
bump
2 posted on 05/01/2004 1:39:48 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destro

3 posted on 05/01/2004 1:40:09 PM PDT by ambrose (AP Headline: "Kerry Says His 'Family' Owns SUV, Not He")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destro
One of the problems I saw is that guards were laughing and full of joy. They were engaging in sadistic pleasures, not going about the business of obtaining useful information via unsavory means.
4 posted on 05/01/2004 1:41:27 PM PDT by ambrose (AP Headline: "Kerry Says His 'Family' Owns SUV, Not He")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Oh, yea - those guards in the photos were not interrogators - probably used by the interrogators to get the atmosphere going? and when the interrogators turned their backs the guards did not stop? That is the thesis this general is putting out there. There can be some truth to what she said but who knows?
5 posted on 05/01/2004 1:43:59 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Destro
"what went wrong is that they allowed the goobers to take snapshots (I guess intelligence was not there to supervise the goobers 24/7)."

Aside from the depraved behavior, that's the thing that gets me, that someone took a picture of it. Not for any official reason but as an asinine joke.

Vile and *stupid*.
6 posted on 05/01/2004 1:44:31 PM PDT by WOSG (http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com - I salute our brave fallen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destro
Whoever is to blame...some generals need to lose some stars. Not just for the torture mind you, but for the fact that it also got out and there are pictures of it...how stupid can you get?
7 posted on 05/01/2004 1:44:34 PM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Yikes! Put a bag over HER head! Seriously, what's sickening is a General who allows this to go on under her command and then blames others.
8 posted on 05/01/2004 1:44:52 PM PDT by Trust but Verify (Charter member Broken Glass Republicans (2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Drango
agreed- Israel for example practices shaking torture as a way to get info out of deadly terrorists. That is not a scene you want to see in pictures - was this an American version of such a thing and they got lax and allowed a relaxed atmosphere to take hold? Who knows - no excuse for the guards - If I was ordered or encouraged in that behavior by intel officers I would decline and file a report with my superior officers.
9 posted on 05/01/2004 1:48:48 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Destro
This has been the biggest boon to the leftists in a long time. This will not die down any time soon.
10 posted on 05/01/2004 1:51:16 PM PDT by vpintheak (Our Liberties we prize, and our rights we will maintain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vpintheak
If the general is claiming this - and she may be trying to cover her ass with a lie - this will not die down for sure.
11 posted on 05/01/2004 1:52:39 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Destro
every one of thes b@st@rds ought to be court martialled on 2 counts each of being stupid. First and foremost for doing it, and last for taking pictures.
12 posted on 05/01/2004 1:56:45 PM PDT by P8riot (A friend will help you move. A good friend will help you move a body.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destro
It is shameful for this General to be speaking thru the media.

She needs to save her comments for the legal action which lies ahead. She knows the current media climate; she's giving fodder for those who are tearing down the American position.

Maybe she's a Clinton-era liberal-type General?

13 posted on 05/01/2004 2:04:34 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trust but Verify
This general should act like a professional and keep her mouth shut.
14 posted on 05/01/2004 2:05:25 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Why the long face, John?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Destro
Calling this "torture" is an exercise in hyperbole.

He11, I've heard of college hazings that were more 'agonizing'.

This soldiers should be drummed out of the military, but charging them with anything more than simple assault is just overkill.

15 posted on 05/01/2004 2:06:53 PM PDT by Darryl Newhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destro
"In other words - suspected terrorist detainees were being given the third degree via psychological not physical abuse to get them to break - what went wrong is that they allowed the goobers to take snapshots (I guess intelligence was not there to supervise the goobers 24/7). "

===

YOU GOT IT!!!!

It is amazing how a vast majority of FReepers fell into the trap of the liberal media.

The reason for this type of method is because public nudity is a major humiliation in Muslim societies.

""The worst thing in Arab culture is for a man to be naked in front of another man," said Gulshen Beyatli, director of Arabs Without Borders in San Francisco."

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2004/05/01/MNG9M6E9C51.DTL

I read somewhere, unfortunately I didn't save THAT link, that prisoners were forbidden to talk with each other, and when they did anyway, this was their punishment.

From one of the incredibly few articles, which even mention who the prisoners were:

"The US military now holds several thousand prisoners at Abu Ghraib, most of them rounded up on suspicion of carrying out attacks against US-led forces."

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/s1098210.htm

And from another article:

"60 Minutes also quoted, however, from an e-mail which Frederick reportedly sent to his family, in which he said of Iraqi prisoners: 'We've had a very high rate with our styles of getting them to break; they usually end up breaking within hours.' "

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/articles/10521131?source=Daily





16 posted on 05/01/2004 2:08:14 PM PDT by FairOpinion (If you are not voting for Bush, you are voting for the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: what's up
I'm sure there are clinton type era liberals in place. They've infiltrated everything else.
17 posted on 05/01/2004 2:14:05 PM PDT by monkeywrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: what's up
Maybe she's a Clinton-era liberal-type General?

The speed at which she threw out the "I Am a Victim" Card leads me to believe that you are correct.

18 posted on 05/01/2004 2:14:48 PM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Destro
I suspect that this general benefited from equal opportunity promotion during the clinton regime. I have news for her: it's a leader's responsibility to supervise her troops.

Also I agree. Somebody really screwed up letting pictures be taken. Some of our troops misbehaved. But I'd like to ask the liberal critics whose prisoner they would rather be, ours or Saddam's?
19 posted on 05/01/2004 2:38:50 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trust but Verify
what's sickening is a General who allows this to go on under her command and then blames others.

BINGO ! No excuses, the buck stops here.

20 posted on 05/01/2004 2:41:01 PM PDT by LowOiL (Christian and proud of it !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Destro
""We're disposable," she said of the military's attitude toward reservists. "Why would they want the active-duty people to take the blame? They want to put this on the M.P.'s and hope that this thing goes away. Well, it's not going to go away." "

So... are any intelligence officers in the photos? Or are they all YOUR troops?
21 posted on 05/01/2004 3:01:10 PM PDT by adam_az (Call your State Republican Party office and VOLUNTEER!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darryl Newhart
If you want a real story, find the dope who posted them on the internet and follow the money. Betcha at least some of the images are stage as well.
22 posted on 05/01/2004 3:06:07 PM PDT by Thebaddog (Woof, scratch and cover!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Destro
Seeing the way the Iraqui's have greeted American soldiers one could assume the prefer Saddam Hussein and Uday and Qusay, Maybe the GI';s were just trying to make them feel at home.
23 posted on 05/01/2004 3:11:35 PM PDT by sgtbono2002 (I aint wrong, I aint sorry , and I am probably going to do it again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P8riot; sultan88
Should never had females over there in the first place.

If you take the average IQ of a group of young cops and divide it by the number of women involved, you will obtain the IQ of the total. It's the Pheromone factor and can be deadly in time of war..

The training of the MPs for the type of ops we knew we were going into is one of the sorriest aspects of this war. And it's not the fault of the reservist but the high Army brass that always wants to Rant to anyone who will listen that they need more boot numbers and tanks and ignore the constant threats to our warriors.
24 posted on 05/01/2004 3:13:57 PM PDT by Phosgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
But they don't have lawyers! Have you no humanity? Every detainee should be assigned at least a US taxpayer provided public defender, three UN observers, and $1M cash for their defense. I can't believe the attitudes of some on this forum. Really. It's just disgraceful. :O)
25 posted on 05/01/2004 3:27:32 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Any day you wake up is a good day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
But I'd like to ask the liberal critics whose prisoner they would rather be, ours or Saddam's?

The libs would reply that you're thinking like a Westerner. That link several posts up about what ragheads think about being naked in front of each other (something that happens to our troops from the day they're inducted) really explains what the issue is here for the Arabs.

I wish we'd have just shot the bastards instead.

26 posted on 05/01/2004 3:27:36 PM PDT by hunter112
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Dark Wing
ping
27 posted on 05/01/2004 3:31:06 PM PDT by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thebaddog
"Betcha at least some of the images are stage as well."

===


Funny, you should say that.

Doubt cast on Iraq torture photos
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1128002/posts

"However the BBC's defence correspondent Paul Adams says sources close to The Queen's Lancashire Regiment believe many aspects of the photographs are extremely suspicious.

He says they believe the pictures may not have been taken in Iraq.

They believe the rifle is an SA80 mk 1 - which was not issued to troops in Iraq.

The paper claims British soldiers
handed over the photos

They say soldiers in Iraq wore berets or hard hats - and not floppy hats as in the photos.

They also believe the wrong type of Bedford truck is shown in the background - a type never deployed in Iraq. Mr Blair said if there had been any abuse it was "exceptional", and should not detract from the good work being done by UK armed forces in Iraq. "




People are just too eager to swallow everything the liberal media with an agenda is dishing out.

28 posted on 05/01/2004 4:04:58 PM PDT by FairOpinion (If you are not voting for Bush, you are voting for the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Destro
I can understand the prisoners being stripped naked with bags over their heads. I can also understand them being laughed at and taunted, I would imagine it is a fairly good technique. But these guys went a bit too far, and what is worse they took pictures.
29 posted on 05/01/2004 4:11:08 PM PDT by McGavin999 (If Kerry can't deal with the "Republican Attack Machine" how is he going to deal with Al Qaeda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
This attitude about being seen naked is very ancient in that part of the world--see Genesis 9.20-27 (story of Noah's drunkenness and cursing Canaan because Canaan's father Ham had seen Noah naked) and Herodotus, The Histories, Book I, Chapter 10.

Herodotus points out that in Lydia and other barbarian nations, it is a source of great shame even for a man to be seen naked--contrary to Greek practice, of course, since they engaged in athletic contests naked.

30 posted on 05/01/2004 4:15:35 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Destro
Excuses won't fly. Regardless of who was behind these acts, they gave our enemies a powerful weapon. An extremely small group made the fight tougher for soldiers trying to establish order.
31 posted on 05/01/2004 4:36:31 PM PDT by backtothestreets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backtothestreets
Yup
32 posted on 05/01/2004 4:42:17 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
There are two different stories
of abuse - one British guards,
the other our guys. These quotes
about fake photos involve Brits.
33 posted on 05/01/2004 4:46:05 PM PDT by txrangerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
One of the problems I saw is that guards were laughing and full of joy. They were engaging in sadistic pleasures

In 1971, a psychology experiment was run at Stanford that has since become world famous. Things got so bad that the experiment had to be shut down after only 5 days. Long story short, they took perfectly normal people, flipped coins to see which would be guards and which would be prisoners, put them in a mock "prison," and then watched what happened. The so-called "normal people" who were given the role of guards very quickly turned into extremely sadistic people who did just these kinds of humiliating things, and they seemed to be having fun doing it. There is an article about it here.

This experiment is something almost all penologists know about. Many real-world examples of this phenomenon have occurred since. This is just another one. It is a known risk that perfectly good people can turn into animals when thrown into this kind of role. Nobody really knows why, but this is a kind of weakness in human beings that anyone managing a prison has to be aware of, and needs to watch out for.


34 posted on 05/01/2004 4:51:15 PM PDT by Nick Danger (We reserve the right to serve refuse to anyone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
I have no problem with the use of psychological pressure & intimidation/humiliation to get information from enemy prisoners ,I do however have a problem with non-professional conduct & what can only be described as FELONIOUS STUPIDITY on the part of the reservists & the intel types.
35 posted on 05/01/2004 5:34:19 PM PDT by Nebr FAL owner (.308 REACH OUT & THUMP SOMEONE .50BMG REACH OUT & CRUSH SOMEONE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Phosgood
Should never had females over there in the first place.

Be careful about speaking the truth too openly around here. You'll have the "girl power" brigade ready to claw your eyes out.

36 posted on 05/01/2004 5:55:08 PM PDT by 91B (God made man, Sam Colt made men equal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
There are also the famous experiments of Stanley Milgram at Yale, which showed that 61% of experimental subjects were willing to kill someone they did not know in response to instructions from an authority figure.

For further reading, see the reviewer comments on the book "Obedience to Authority" by Stanley Milgram at http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/006131983X/qid=1083463760/sr=1-2/ref=sr_1_2/103-8711593-0932663?v=glance&s=books

37 posted on 05/01/2004 7:15:24 PM PDT by Lessismore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
Although I am disgusted by those pictures and believe someone needs to be held accountable, I really don't see why we should be so sensitive to Arab mores, when they condone things as suicide bombers, blood libel of the Jews, and:

"Ignoring the pleas of his 14-year-old daughter to spare her life, Mehmet Halitogullari pulled on a wire wrapped around her neck and strangled her--supposedly to restore the family's honor after she was kidnapped and raped."

This from an AP story discussed in Taranto's Best of the Web column. I thought we were going over there to redeem the culture, not appease it.

38 posted on 05/01/2004 9:53:18 PM PDT by Timmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson