Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US abruptly demotes Saddam general in Fallujah
Telegraph ^ | May 3, 2004 | Toby Harnden

Posted on 05/03/2004 9:44:42 PM PDT by John Jorsett

The general selected by the US marines to command a new Iraqi force in Fallujah has been abruptly replaced after he denied that there were foreign fighters in the insurgent city and blamed America for fomenting the bloody rebellion there.

Maj Gen Jassim Mohammed Saleh, a former member of Saddam Hussein's Republican Guard, was trumpeted by local US commanders as the type of strong man who could pacify the 2,000 gunmen in Fallujah.

 
Gen Saleh: appointment angered Iraqi politicians

But in an indication of American desperation, it emerged that Gen Saleh had been selected even though little was known about him.

One of his main tasks was to ensure that an estimated several hundred foreign fighters were handed over to coalition forces. On Saturday, Lt Gen James Conway, the US marines commander, said the general was ready to deal with them.

Shortly afterwards, Gen Saleh said: "There are no foreign fighters in Fallujah and the local tribal leaders have told me the same.

"The reasons for the resistance go back to the American provocations, the raids and abolishing the army, which made Iraqis join the resistance."

Yesterday, coalition officials in Baghdad said Maj Gen Mohammed Latif, a military intelligence officer thought to have been exiled by Saddam, would take charge of the new Fallujah force and Gen Saleh would be a subordinate.

The appearance of Gen Saleh on the streets of Fallujah enraged several senior Iraqi politicians.

Iyad Allawi, the defence minister, said: "There is no place in the new Iraqi army for officers of Saddam's Republican Guard or those who have committed crimes against the Iraqi people."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fallujah; iraq; iraqiarmy; republicanguard; saleh

1 posted on 05/03/2004 9:44:42 PM PDT by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
I have to say that this does not make us look like we know what we're doing.
2 posted on 05/03/2004 9:45:30 PM PDT by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
a former member of Saddam Hussein's Republican Guard,

Are we surprised?? Wonder what they expected?

3 posted on 05/03/2004 9:48:22 PM PDT by potlatch ( Medals do not make a man. Morals do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
I have to say that this does not make us look like we know what we're doing.

Agreed. We chose to lie down with a dog in this case, and woke up with fleas.

4 posted on 05/03/2004 9:48:38 PM PDT by Numbers Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Well....they sure took care of that FAST.....
5 posted on 05/03/2004 9:49:19 PM PDT by goodnesswins (Tagging you.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
SOrry about the screwed up link in the story. Click here instead.
6 posted on 05/03/2004 9:49:38 PM PDT by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
So we are supposed to believe they didn't know very much about him???
7 posted on 05/03/2004 9:50:45 PM PDT by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: potlatch
Are we surprised?? Wonder what they expected?

I thought at least that they'd have had a sit-down with the guy and told him not to make any statements contradicting a US position without checking with us first. Or maybe they did and he just chose to proceed on his merry way regardless. Sigh.

8 posted on 05/03/2004 9:52:05 PM PDT by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
It does look bad but it could have one other effect. This is one down and a new batter up. If he tanks then the case can be made that we gave it our best shot and then go back in full force.
9 posted on 05/03/2004 9:54:26 PM PDT by Texasforever (The French love John Kerry. He is their new Jerry Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Or maybe this general was purposely made an example of what happens if they stray to far from the desired goal. Well, at least the optimistic side of me can believe it was the plan. :)
10 posted on 05/03/2004 9:54:59 PM PDT by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
--

FIRED !

Gen Salehsaid: "There are no foreign fighters in Fallujah and the local tribal leaders have told me the same. "The reasons for the resistance go back to the American provocations, the raids and abolishing the army, which made Iraqis join the resistance."

11 posted on 05/03/2004 9:55:12 PM PDT by KQQL (@)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
As PFC Gomer Pyle would say, "Surprise, surprise!"
12 posted on 05/03/2004 9:55:25 PM PDT by RBroadfoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
This is sickening. What a clusterf__k. George Bush is an amateur.
13 posted on 05/03/2004 9:55:44 PM PDT by mercy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mercy
This society has no leaders. We only allow unichs to take power. We deserve whatever happens to us.
14 posted on 05/03/2004 9:58:03 PM PDT by mercy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mercy
This is sickening. What a clusterf__k. George Bush is an amateur.

His next move will be appointing Osama Bin Laden as head of the Iraqi Air Force.

15 posted on 05/03/2004 9:58:09 PM PDT by lowbridge ("You are an American. You are my brother. I would die for you." -Kurdish Sergeant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Yes, he must have been a good talker to convince our people to use him!! Too bad, he could have been a help, now he won't be trusted for any job under our military.
16 posted on 05/03/2004 9:59:37 PM PDT by potlatch ( Medals do not make a man. Morals do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
I think Sadaam Husein(sp) will be released from prison and put in charge to restore peace in Iraq.
Nothing would surprise me anymore!
17 posted on 05/03/2004 10:02:58 PM PDT by mickie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mercy
We need to find a strongman and stick him in there. A former Prince or some such something or other.
18 posted on 05/03/2004 10:03:45 PM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
No, it's the media that is making us look like we don't know what we're doing. The military has been saying from the start that this man hadn't been vetted yet. It's the media who jumped to conclusions.
19 posted on 05/03/2004 10:05:03 PM PDT by McGavin999 (If Kerry can't deal with the "Republican Attack Machine" how is he going to deal with Al Qaeda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nonstatist
No, we need to partion the country into three parts, protect the oil fields and let the bastards kill each other wholesale.
20 posted on 05/03/2004 10:05:28 PM PDT by mercy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
Obviously the military doesn't have much say in the matter.
21 posted on 05/03/2004 10:07:11 PM PDT by mercy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
I can only shake my head with disgust at this turd circus.
22 posted on 05/03/2004 10:09:12 PM PDT by squidly (I have always felt that a politician is to be judged by the animosity he excites among his opponents)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mercy
Yep, obviously it's the media who is making the decisions. At least that's how it must be since they are the ones telling us all this, and we have people who are dumb enough to believe it.
23 posted on 05/03/2004 10:09:28 PM PDT by McGavin999 (If Kerry can't deal with the "Republican Attack Machine" how is he going to deal with Al Qaeda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: mercy
George Bush did not pick the general.
24 posted on 05/03/2004 10:10:13 PM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
I am SHOCKED! I'll also throw in "deeeeeeeeeeply concerrrrrrrrrned."

This must do wonders for troop morale. Not.

To heck with this, It's time for Captain Paintball's "THREE Ls:"

LEAFLETS for the citizens. Women and children have 24 hours to "ex-cape". (a little ebonics lingo, there.) ALL men leaving the city will be set aside in a nearby camp and interrogated. Humanely, of course.

LEVEL the city. With the force of 1000 daisycutters, Fallujah will be incinerated in a show of force not seen since Hiroshima.

'LIM-IN-ATE the survivors. Those not smart enough to leave, and all the "brave" insurgents left alive will be put out of their misery.

This will work if we do it hard, fast, and without apology.

25 posted on 05/03/2004 10:11:29 PM PDT by Captainpaintball (All it takes for Liberalism to triumph is for Conservatives to fail in their responsibilities.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mercy
Of course there is always the possibility that someone decided to put in place a Saddamite general for the Islamics in Al Fallujah to swoon over that they could then fire. That the US put this guy in charge one day and fired him the next, shows they did not win in Al Fallujah despite the 24 hours of talk on the part of the Islamics.

Is there this kind of deep thinking going on on the part of US officials in Iraq? Who knows. But it would take an Iraqi like this guy that the governing counsel would not be greatly supportive of for this to work out like it has.
26 posted on 05/03/2004 10:15:44 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
OR, there was no way he wanted to be caught between the Marines and his insane countrymen so he took the quickest way out.
27 posted on 05/03/2004 10:17:19 PM PDT by Let's Roll (Kerry is a self-confessed unindicted war criminal or ... a traitor to his country in a time of war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Captainpaintball
Never happen. PC RULES. We're screwed. No, our sodiers (sons and daughters) are screwed.
28 posted on 05/03/2004 10:17:24 PM PDT by mercy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mickie
Man, you got that right! It will happen sooner than later. Our Generals over there have no frigging clue what they are doing!
29 posted on 05/03/2004 10:31:52 PM PDT by USMMA_83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
Another Bagdad, Bob. Bring him over here and let him work for the DNC.
30 posted on 05/03/2004 10:33:49 PM PDT by oyez (Fortune favors the bold.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Sounds like a psychological means to an end.

He became the example of what to NOT do in short order for one reason or another.

Trust me...if you dig far enough into the mind of a terrorist, you would realize that there is a much bigger mark...the Marines already seized the opportunity to MAKE A POINT.

Think extremely hard here.

Saving PFC Lynch help.

Otay, then.

More examples, anyone.

31 posted on 05/03/2004 10:44:33 PM PDT by Kate of Spice Island
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mercy
This one I agree with you. I think we need to form the Federal Republic of Iraq. It would be made up of 3 states, the northern state, the central state and the southern state. Baghdad might be the equivalent of DC, a federal capital city.

I would think that Ninawa, Dahuk, Abril, As Sulmaniyah and At Tamim provinces might make up the Northern state. Whether or not we officially could call it Kurdish, that is what it would be. [Keep in mind for this state and the other two, I am guessing about which province belongs where. Ninawa might for example group better with the Central state.

The Central state might be made up of Al Anbar, Salahad, Baghdad and Diyala provinces. This would at least unofficially be the Sunni state.

I am not sure which state Babil province belongs in but lets say for now the Southern state along with An Najaf, Al Qadisiyana, Maysan, Dhi Qar, Al Bassrah and Al Muthanna provinces. Again remember, I am guess which provinces actually group where, but this is clearly the Shia state.

Then the US puts three huge bases in place. One between south of Kurkuk and north of Tikrit. Another south of Baghdad but north of Al Najaf. The third on the outskirts of Baghdad.

They get a bicarmeral legislature. Each state gets 10 Senators and each state gets their share by population of 100 members of the lower body. They have a popularly elected executive and a constitution that is very explicit about INDIVIDUAL rights.

The US stays on these bases except if fighting is about to break out between the various states. The US also focuses on border security so that the Iraqis can have their own internal battles.

The oil fields are in the two states, Northern and Southern where things have been calmer since major combat ended. The US gets 99 years leases on the bases. The US pays only to build its bases and the Iraqi government must use the country's oil money and any money stolen by France, Russia and Germany it recovers to rebuild infrastructure. Each state could have a capital, police force etc, but no army. Only the Federal government would have an army.

Here is a map of Iraq for examining my proposed states:

http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/middle_east_and_asia/iraq_wall_full_2003.jpg

32 posted on 05/03/2004 10:51:05 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Perhaps there is another Wesley Clarke type in the military?
33 posted on 05/03/2004 10:52:27 PM PDT by the_Watchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the_Watchman
Perhaps there is another Wesley Clarke type in the military?

So we can have more refugees than we can stick a shake at?

34 posted on 05/03/2004 11:05:57 PM PDT by Kate of Spice Island ("And Clark could not afford the extra vowel, so he didn't solve the puzzle, Vanna.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: JLS
A couple quick comments:

Ninawa would without question be in the northern Kurdish dominated state, although it's possible that the southernmost quarter of the province might be partitioned off.

I would guess that Babil would also be partitioned, with the northern half to go with the Sunni state, probably added to Baghdad province for administrative purposes.

People keep ignoring that there are also oil fields in Central Iraq - the East Baghdad field has an estimated 11 billion barrels in reserves - compared to the northern Kirkuk field, by example, that has an estimated 9 billion barrels left. I dunno why people keep brushing off the Baghdad field..

Iraq should be partitioned into three independent nations - ASAP.
35 posted on 05/03/2004 11:06:52 PM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: JLS; Captainpaintball
A hybrid of the two plans would be the best strategy.

Take out the trash, organize and meet that June 30th deadline!

36 posted on 05/03/2004 11:11:51 PM PDT by Kate of Spice Island (Just a thought...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
It may be time for some micromanagement.
37 posted on 05/03/2004 11:13:06 PM PDT by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: firstiamaussoldier
I think you are right. One for the short-term, the other for the long-term. I can't understand why forcing tribal-minded savages to live together in one common boundary seemed like a good idea to anyone.
38 posted on 05/03/2004 11:21:45 PM PDT by Captainpaintball (All it takes for Liberalism to triumph is for Conservatives to fail in their responsibilities.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: squidly
I can only shake my head with disgust at this turd circus.

Couldn't agree more. This is so incredibly pathetic - reminds me of our worst from Vietnam - makes me sick. I really thought Bush had more of a backbone. I doubt we'll recover from this fiasco.

I'm sure the Iraqization of this war is going to be just as successful as the Vietnamization of that other war.

39 posted on 05/03/2004 11:21:48 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
bush said we would use double dealing, turn enemies against themselves, use subterfuge to turn enemies to allies one day and back against each other on other occasions....

THIS...
could be...
THAT.

I dunno.
Bait and switch... bigger than a loss leader at your local kmart seems to be going on...

40 posted on 05/03/2004 11:55:25 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2 (the madridification of our election is now officially underway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
Maybe we are playing a "yo yo" strategy in Iraq... to keep certain elements in the region off balance... perhaps even in other nations, that are secretly allied against us.

stranger things have happened.
the press is being played... for what I don't know.
41 posted on 05/03/2004 11:57:20 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2 (the madridification of our election is now officially underway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
Iraq should be partitioned into three independent nations - ASAP.

That's a cut and run strategy doomed to failure. Every one of the American warriors who have sacrificed life and limb will have done so in vain.

42 posted on 05/04/2004 12:18:18 AM PDT by Barlowmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Two steps backward and two steps forward, one step sideways and ... what were we doing again??

UGH. What are they thinking???

43 posted on 05/04/2004 1:38:22 AM PDT by GeronL ("We are beyond right and wrong" the scariest words from the radical left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
How about this for a strategy...our troops have to interact with them. The overwhelming majority are not much different than you or me. The primary difference is in how they treat their women. I know most of you have read about it. There is even an insurgent who I read about on a local website...I will look and see if the article is still there...

Anyhow, he said that he was treated like a woman. There is one name we can give our newborn girls and hope that the troops hear of this and get it circulater quickly. Sharayah is the name I almost gave my daughter. We pick our childrens names for a reason, what better than to honor our own little girls so much as to make men rethink about theirs.

44 posted on 05/04/2004 2:41:16 AM PDT by Kate of Spice Island (Sharayah is on the Amy Grant Unguarded CD ask a Muslim for the meaning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Maybe it's time to do what needs to be done in Iraq.
45 posted on 05/04/2004 2:59:57 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Barlowmaker
It might be a cut & run for some people, but that has always been what I thought the best solution for Iraq. Heck, that's what I wanted to see happen in Iraq back in 1991. I think my first Iraq comments on FR a couple years ago mentioned the preferability of partition.

Why is it a cut and run strategy doomed to failure?? What is so superior about forcing together an artificial republic of three peoples that hate each other?

46 posted on 05/04/2004 6:03:17 AM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
It makes sense to me, three States forming one Republic.
47 posted on 05/04/2004 6:57:58 AM PDT by mickie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: mickie
If it was a truly confederate system much like the former Yugoslavia, then I agree that it could probably work out OK enough.
48 posted on 05/04/2004 7:32:45 AM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero - something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
At the end of WWII...Nazis were put in charge of the circus....some of them made names for themselves.....we called them "WEREWOLVES" and when we caught them running subversion operations....
THEY WERE HUNG ON THE SPOT FROM LAMPOSTS....but now that would probably be called a
friggen "war crime".....
49 posted on 05/04/2004 7:53:18 PM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson