Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Protesters bash Wal-Mart's attempt to open 2 stores in city
Chicago Sun Times ^ | may 2, 2004 | Protesters bash Wal-Mart's attempt to open 2 stores in city

Posted on 05/05/2004 3:19:28 PM PDT by KOZ.

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last
To: hunter112
Chicago area Walmarts - mileage from downtown:

http://yp.yahoo.com/py/ypResults.py?stx=walmart&stp=a&tab=B2C&zip=60600&uzip=60600&country=us&msa=1600&slt=41.850000&sln=-87.650000&cs=5
41 posted on 05/06/2004 2:55:12 AM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: KOZ.
It was reported in CNN that Wal-Mart recieved $245 million in so-called "subsidies" by governments interested in having a store in their town.

And how much in income and sales tax did Wal-Mart pay, as compared to the $245 million in "subsidies," I wonder?

Let's see, they had $256,329,000,000 in sales in FY2003.

At a national average combined sales tax rate of 8%, that comes to $20,506,320,000 worth of sales tax paid to cities, towns, and states. Even if you assume half that amount, given that so many people in Massachusetts shop Wal-Mart in tax-free New Hampshire and other tax-avoidance situations, that's still over $10 billion dollars.

They had $9,054,000,000 in net income, a figure that has been increasing steadily for years, and they paid, as of Jan 04, $5,118,000,000 in state and federal income taxes.

The so-called "subsidies" provided by cities and towns nationwide looking to land a Wal-Mart store, adding up to $245 million, amount to nearly a 6,400% return on investment.

And that doesn't count the money collected from the purchasing and income of the store's employees.

I'd lay money on the "free" land they got being government-owned brownfields unmarketable to any other buyer.

42 posted on 05/24/2004 2:32:03 PM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KOZ.

Its funny the same criticism of Wal-mart comes from the same folks kvetching about the outsourcing of jobs overseas. Wal-mart would create thousands of minimum wage jobs for young black men and women in Chicago and give them the chance to move up the economic ladder. But to liberals, better no job than a job that pays an unskilled person a starting wage. That's their compassion for people in Chicago who want a shot at the American Dream: we're going to block the doors to keep you from getting a chance to have it cause Wal-mart isn't paying what WE consider the right wage. Add to that the Left's dislike of people being able to buy quality goods at the lowest prices. Not to mention all that tax revenue Chicago won't be getting to support schools and municipal services. Oy vey!


43 posted on 05/24/2004 2:39:22 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson