Posted on 05/07/2004 3:20:28 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
Let's see.
President Bush has testified.
Vice President Dick Cheney has testified.
Bill Clinton has testified.
One name is conspicuously absent from the witness list of the 9-11 Commission.
Al Gore.
What does Al Gore know about events leading to the disastrous terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001?
Let me tell you the nation's newest media mogul contributed, in his own politically ambitious, selfish way, to the deaths of some of the victims of the terrorist attacks Sept. 11.
Following the downing of TWA Flight 800 in 1996, Gore was entrusted by President Clinton to investigate airline safety. He was named chairman of the White House Commission on Aviation Safety.
The Gore commission produced what most observers considered to be a tough preliminary report unveiled Sept. 9 of that year – one that included tough counter-terrorism procedures.
But within days, according to an insider on the commission, the airline industry jumped all over Gore. As a result, 10 days later, Gore sent a letter to airline lobbyist Carol Hallett promising that the commission's findings would not result in any loss of revenue.
In what can only be seen as a pure political payoff, the Democratic National Committee received $40,000 from TWA the next day. Within two weeks, Northwest, United and American Airlines ponied up another $55,000 for the 1996 campaign.
But the money trail didn't stop there. In the next two months leading up to the November elections, American Airlines donated $250,000 to the Democrats. United donated $100,000 to the DNC. Northwestern put $53,000 more into the kitty.
Following the election, in January, Gore floated a draft final report that eliminated all security measures from the commission's findings, according to the insider. Two commission members balked, as did CIA Director John Deutch.
Fearing more political heat, Gore pulled back the draft report. A month later, the final report was issued – one that included requirements that would cost the airlines some money, but, perhaps, save some lives in the future.
The report's requirements included:
Only one thing was lacking from the report, said the whistleblower – there was no deadline by which those requirements would have to be met. It was open-ended. In other words, it wasn't worth the paper on which it was written.
In a meeting with other commission members Feb. 12, 1997, Gore said he would leave room for a dissent by those who opposed the report. But within minutes, Gore was announcing to the president and the public that the report was the work of a unanimous commission.
In other words, he lied – again.
In Washington, that might have been the end of the story. Scandals like this often go unnoticed. But one courageous lady, the dissenting member of the commission, Victoria Cummock, filed suit to gain access to files she was denied and for the right to file her dissent.
Who is Mrs. Cummock? She was appointed to the commission by Clinton because her husband was killed in the terrorist downing of Pan Am Flight 103 in Lockerbie, Scotland. She's the insider. She's the whistleblower. She's the heroine of this story.
Would any of the death and destruction of 9-11 have been prevented had Gore not crawled into bed with the airline industry thinking only in the short term about potential financial losses, not realizing it might be saving itself from much bigger losses in the future?
That's a question that deserves to be asked at the 9-11 Commission. It's about time Al Gore was held accountable for his selfish, politically motivated role in inviting the skyjackings of Sept. 11.
Does the name Al Husseini ring a bell? He worked at Logan during 9-11, and he was possibly involved in OKC.
OKC-911 CONNECTION ALERT. Please let me know by freepmail if you want to be taken off this list. Thanks.
The investigation of 800 was obviously ordained with the conclusion drawn within 48 hours after the crash occurred.Find a leak in the gas-tank: or heads will roll.
We the People... want answers that the politicians aren't giving us.You have a good idea here but the fact that the economy is improving will make any attempt to really organize the people even more difficult than it already is. An improving economy will put all these questions on the back burner. Which is good for W's re-election (and in my opinion that means good for us) but not so good for political action designed to get to the truth behind these events.
Besides, on a certain level, I lose interest in all these details. I want more and better weaponry for our military. I want the Patriot Act extended and fine-tuned. I want the intelligence services to get creative and effective. The past is important. But I personally am more interested in going all-out fighting the war and not worrying so much about figuring out every single detail in the past. I'm not criticizing historical analysis, but I'm not really into it myself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.