Skip to comments.Not Unfamiliar; Images of sexual abuse and humiliation in Abu Ghraib.
Posted on 05/08/2004 10:51:11 PM PDT by Beau Schott
May 06, 2004, 8:34 a.m.
Images of sexual abuse and humiliation in Abu Ghraib.
The photographs of sexual abuse and humiliation of Iraqi prisoners in Abu Ghraib prison are shocking and disgusting. They are also familiar. I have seen images like these before in other places and contexts.The Taguba Report on the abuses at Abu Ghraib prison found that "numerous incidents of sadistic, blatant, and wanton criminal abuses were inflicted on several detainees." Credible evidence was found that Iraqi detainees had been subjected to acts such as:
Videotaping and photographing naked male and female detainees;
Forcibly arranging detainees in various sexually explicit positions for photographing;
Forcing detainees to remove their clothing and keeping them naked for several days at a time;
Forcing naked male detainees to wear women's underwear;
Forcing groups of male detainees to masturbate while being photographed and videotaped;
Writing "I am a Rapest" (sic) on the leg of a detainee alleged to have forcibly raped a 15-year-old fellow detainee, and then photographing him naked;
Placing a dog chain or strap around a naked detainee's neck and having a female soldier pose for a picture;
A male MP guard having sex with a female detainee;
Taking photographs of dead Iraqi detainees;
Pouring cold water on naked detainees;
Threatening male detainees with rape;
Sodomizing a detainee with a chemical light and perhaps a broomstick.
In these sadistic acts, there are themes, methods, and goals that cross a number of boundaries and categories we have set up to organize our thinking and comprehend such behaviors and images. These acts are attacks on the victims' dignity, identity, and bodily integrity. They create such feelings of shame and fear that they destroy the victims' ability to maintain their sense of self-respect and identity. These types of humiliation and abuse are used in other settings to achieve similar goals.
I once interviewed a trafficker in Ukraine. She was one of a number of pimps who worked for an organized crime network in upscale hotels in central Moscow. She had criminal collaborators recruit women and girls in Ukraine and send them to her in Moscow where she took their passports, made them watch hours of pornography, and then forced them into prostitution. She gave me a set of photographs of a young woman, probably in her teens, being humiliated and abused. In one photograph, the young woman is seated naked on the floor with a soiled sanitary napkin tied to her forehead. In other photographs the victim's face in being forced into the buttocks and crotch of a naked woman who is squatting above her. In yet another, her face is being forced into a stream of urine. The purpose of this degradation is to break a victim's spirit, to destroy her capacity to resist, and to transform her into a compliant slave who performs sex acts for men, and makes money for organized crime and corrupt officials. The process of breaking the victim was documented by photographing it so the victim knows that a record of her powerlessness and humiliation has been recorded. The photographs can be used later to coerce her into cooperating with the pimp by threatening her with exposure by sending copies to friends, family, a boyfriend at home, or put on the Internet for the whole world to see.
In Ukraine, I interviewed a young woman who should have been in a college classroom. Instead, she was on the street each night selling sex acts. She had been temporarily compelled into prostitution in order to earn money for a medical procedure to save her infant son's life. One night a man used a razor blade to cut the Ukrainian equivalent of the word "whore" into her flesh. She believed she was marked and defined for life.
I have read and heard survivor testimony from women imprisoned in Evin prison in Tehran, where democracy activists are raped, tortured, and sexually humiliated. The religious fascists of Iran attack the very essence of the women's being and identity in order to destroy their personal and political will to resist.
A few years ago, I was hired by the Council of Europe to research how new information technologies (mostly the Internet) are used to traffic women and children for purposes of sexual exploitation. I documented and analyzed websites which offered rape videos, live video chat of sexual abuse and torture of victims, sex tours, the sale of Eastern European women for the production of pornography, and mail-order-bride services that are likely front operations for trafficking of women and girls. I found websites with sexualized images of women depicted as being dead or murdered. I saw many images that resembled those from Abu Ghraib.
The images from Abu Ghraib are trophy pictures. The sadistic MPs are shown posing, smiling, and gloating over their victims and what they have made them do. Similarly, I found numerous offers on the Internet from pimps for men to bring cameras and video recorders with them to make trophy images and videos of their sexual use of women and girls.
Why are we shocked by these images from Abu Ghraib, but when the victims are women (or gay men) the images are called pornography or "adult entertainment"? Why can we easily see the violations of human beings in one set of images, but miss it in others? What if the Iraqi men had been forced to smile, could we be convinced that there was a newly formed "publishing and film production" company in Baghdad instead of sexual abuse and humiliation being perpetrated?
President Bush and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld have condemned the acts and the abuse of the Iraqis. They said that these acts do not represent American values. I want to believe that is true. Yet, I see the common themes and methods used by other types of perpetrators on different victims. These similar images are what the young American soldiers from the Internet generation have grown up with and learned to call "adult entertainment." Did they become desensitized to the harm of doing such things to people by seeing multiple images of similar abuse to women? Did they learn how to violate someone by being a voyeur to abuse, and in Abu Ghraib they had the chance to become perpetrators and pornographers? Did they fully comprehend the harm they were doing?
On days like this, I search for security, for hope that there is decency and good in the world, and for reassurance that there are people committed to defeating the terrorists, the pornographers, the torturers, and the slave traders all of whom intend to enslave and destroy so many lives.
I am fortunate to have friends and colleagues who get out of bed each morning to work for human rights, freedom, and democracy, who risk their safety to rescue victims, who take positions for what they think is right even if it is unpopular, and who speak out against atrocities that most people do not want to think about. They know that only by exposing abuses, naming them for what they are, and holding perpetrators accountable can we build free societies. They are feminists, liberals, conservatives, Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, women, and men. They are people who have the moral clarity and courage to be leaders in the fight against all the forms of sexual abuse, terror, and slavery. I am privileged to know and work with them.
Donna M. Hughes is a professor and the Carlson Endowed Chair in Women's Studies at the University of Rhode Island
But then what do I know, maybe the rest of the world doesn't want to be part of the gay san francisco party scene.
Very compelling point. Yet another danger from the anything-goes-society mentality.
What political career. It is revisionist to forget his policy twists of 2000. Having said that he is one of the few Dems that don't belong in an Outer Limits episode.
By Mike Allen
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, September 24, 2003 ; Page A23
Delegates to the U.N. General Assembly had heard President Bush condemn terrorism and nuclear proliferation in previous speeches, but at the end of yesterday's address, he added a new warning, about the dangers of the international trade in sex slaves. The State Department estimates that at least 800,000 women, children and men are sold across borders each year, many for captivity in squalid brothels that foster the spread of AIDS. Bush condemned the "special evil in the abuse and exploitation of the most innocent and vulnerable." He said the young victims "see little of life before they see the very worst of life."
"We must show new energy in fighting back an old evil," Bush said. "Nearly two centuries after the abolition of the transatlantic slave trade, and more than a century after slavery was officially ended in its last strongholds, the trade in human beings for any purpose must not be allowed to thrive in our time."
Bush's aides said that the passage on slavery in yesterday's speech allowed him to close on a note on which he could find wider agreement than on his call to action on Iraq , and that he took care to note that the United States had contributed to the crisis by providing a market. A State Department report said that nearly 20,000 victims enter the United States each year.
"This problem has appeared in my own country, and we are working to stop it," Bush said. "The victims of this industry also need help from members of the United Nations. And this begins with clear standards and the certainty of punishment under laws of every country."
With little public attention, the White House, the State Department and the Justice Department have begun acting to deter human trafficking, which has become a focus of Christian conservative groups as they increasingly turn to international issues.
Scott Reed , a Republican consultant, said the international sex trade is the rare issue that "covers the Christian conservatives and the soccer moms at the same time."
"It's an issue that moderate, independent women can warm to because it shows the softer side of Bush," Reed said. "These are the women in the suburbs of the Midwest who will help decide the 2004 election."
Administration officials said the slave trade helps underwrite international organized crime and, by providing money for weapons, fosters terrorism. But Republican officials said Bush is equally interested in the moral dimension of the issue.
Rep. Christopher H. Smith (R-N.J.), who wrote legislation against human trafficking that President Bill Clinton signed into law, said that he has discussed the issue with Bush and that the president's attention to it springs from his Christian faith. "You can see it in his eyes when he talks about it," Smith said. "He has compassion for the victims, and outrage about the international pimps and exploiters."
During an interview Sunday with Fox News, Bush talked frankly about his faith. "I pray daily, and I pray in all kinds of places," he told interviewer Brit Hume. "I pray in bed, I pray in the Oval Office. I pray a lot . . . as the spirit moves me. And faith is an integral part of my life."
Asked about his faith and Iraq , Bush said: "I would never use God to promote foreign policy decisions. I recognize that in the eyes of an Almighty, I am a lowly sinner, and I ask for strength and wisdom, and I pray for calmness when the seas are storming."
Clinton signed the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Prevention Act of 2000, which established sanctions for countries that the State Department determines are making too little progress toward the goals of reducing human slavery, including those involving education and prosecution.
On Sept. 10, Bush imposed the first sanctions under the act, on Burma , Cuba and North Korea . The United States already has sanctions on those countries, but an administration official said the designation could curtail educational and cultural exchanges.
Bush also named war-ravaged Liberia and Sudan as chronic offenders in the State Department's third annual "Trafficking in Persons" report. He said 10 other countries had avoided penalties by taking steps to fight human trafficking. © 2003 The Washington Post Company