Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CAFTA: Stepping Stone to the FTAA
New American ^ | May 17, 2004

Posted on 05/09/2004 2:33:19 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: NewRomeTacitus
Why? Globalist.
21 posted on 05/09/2004 11:16:16 PM PDT by endthematrix (To enter my lane you must use your turn signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
"...we'll all be the same."

Now that Washington catch-phrase, "we need to level the playing field" becomes clear.

22 posted on 05/09/2004 11:25:27 PM PDT by endthematrix (To enter my lane you must use your turn signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix
Why what? I touched on more than one problem.
23 posted on 05/09/2004 11:55:04 PM PDT by NewRomeTacitus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: NewRomeTacitus
"Why does Bush want to sign this?"

The New American has repeatedly exposed the "insiders" and their goals.

24 posted on 05/10/2004 12:02:18 AM PDT by endthematrix (To enter my lane you must use your turn signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix

I keep coming back to Novus Ordo Seclorum too often to discount. Only a fool disregards what he keeps stumbling over. Very bad stuff.

25 posted on 05/10/2004 12:30:33 AM PDT by NewRomeTacitus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mulder
Why is it that our "leaders" seek a zero percent tax rate on goods transferred between nations, but a 10% tax rate on goods exchanged between US citizens, a 20% tax rate on capital investments made in America by Americans, and a 30% tax rate on the labor that an American trades with his employer?

Because those goods have already been taxed by the home country?

26 posted on 05/10/2004 5:18:56 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Because those goods have already been taxed by the home country?

LOL! So it appeals to their (politicians) sense of fairness and justice, which politicians of both parties like Bill Clinton have plenty of? You have to be kidding.

The real agenda is the eventual eradication of political borders. One of the first steps is the elimination of economic borders. Just look at the EU. First they had the common market, then a common currency, and finally a centralized political union.

The 'powers that be' have a similar agenda for us Americans.

27 posted on 05/10/2004 5:37:23 AM PDT by Mulder (Fight the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
That still doesn't answer why only certain exchanges must go to supporting our giant government. American labor is being severely punished.
28 posted on 05/10/2004 5:41:47 AM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
Generally speaking, taxing an export as it leaves the country places it at a competitive disadvantage if the importing country taxes it as well. Reducing the importing country's ability to tax that item allows each individual country to tax its own product, and set its own tax policy.
29 posted on 05/10/2004 5:53:15 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
places it at a competitive disadvantage if the importing country taxes it as well.

Then we need to end the income tax, social security tax and all other taxes that make American products be at such a disadvantage. American workers cannot compete because we have such a massive government to support. Look at the huge chunk taken out of our paychecks before we even see them --- Chinese don't have that to contend with.

30 posted on 05/10/2004 6:22:14 AM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
Agreed.
31 posted on 05/10/2004 6:23:04 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
Look at the huge chunk taken out of our paychecks before we even see them --- Chinese don't have that to contend with.

_________

I believe a flat tax should be implemented, but only for the protection of the United States. Funding should be for military purposes, interstate highway systems, things that are necessary to this country. (things like welfare should be dropped - it does not benefit the country as a whole, but steals from those who work for a living)

Now, there is one other thing the Chinese do not have that we have: FREEDOM.
32 posted on 05/12/2004 7:33:35 AM PDT by Iron Matron (Those who serve two masters also have two faces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson